| Literature DB >> 32605151 |
Ling-Hong Meng1,2, Xiao-Ming Li1,2, Hong-Lei Li1,2, Bin-Gui Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
The co-cultivation of two or more different microbial strains in one culture vessel was supposed to be a viable experimental approach for enhancing the diversity of the compounds produced. Two new meroterpenoid derivatives, chermebilaenes A (1) and B (2), together with three known sesquiterpenoids, sesquicaranoic acid B (3), cyclonerodiol (4) and bisabol-l-on-13-säuremethylester (5), were characterized from a co-culture of the marine-derived fungal isolates of Penicillium bilaiae MA-267 and Penicillium chermesinum EN-480. Neither fungus produced these compounds when cultured alone under the same conditions. Compound 1 represents an unprecedented acorane-type sesquiterpene hybridized with an octadecadienoic acid skeleton. The structures were elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic analysis, and the absolute configurations were assumed on the basis of acidic hydrolysis combined with modified Mosher's method and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) calculations. Compound 1 showed potent inhibitory activities against Ceratobasidium cornigerum and Edwardsiella tarda.Entities:
Keywords: Penicillium bilaiae; Penicillium chermesinum; antimicrobial activity; co-culture; secondary metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32605151 PMCID: PMC7401264 DOI: 10.3390/md18070339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–5.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data of compounds 1–2.
| No. | 1 (Acquired in CDCl3) | 2 (Acquired in DMSO- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 2.74, overlap | 57.4, CH | 25.8, CH2 | |
| 2 | 5.21, td (8.6, 4.2) | 77.8, CH | 2.33, m | 29.3, CH2 |
| 3 | 38.7, CH2 | 173.2, C | ||
| 4 | 2.02, overlap | 38.3, CH | 73.0, C | |
| 5 | 46.9, C | 1.33, dd (12.6, 2.3) | 49.0, CH | |
| 6 | 31.9, CH2 | 1.44, m | 29.1, CH2 | |
| 7 | 5.38, m | 71.3, CH | 3.71, dq (10.0, 4.0) | 67.0, CH |
| 8 | 132.1, C | 2.39, m | 46.6, CH | |
| 9 | 5.49, dd (3.3, 1.8) | 125.3, CH | 92.1, C | |
| 10 | 34.8, CH2 | 44.7, C | ||
| 11 | 142.8, C | 49.7, CH2 | ||
| 12 | 114.4, CH2 | 0.90, d (7.2) | 10.2, CH3 | |
| 13 | 1.76, s | 24.4, CH3 | 66.7, CH2 | |
| 14 | 1.08, d (7.1) | 17.6, CH3 | 1.20, s | 34.3, CH3 |
| 15 | 1.63, s | 19.2, CH3 | 1.15, s | 25.9, CH3 |
| 16 | 171.0, C | |||
| 17 | 2.00, s | 21.4, CH3 | ||
| 1’ | 173.8, C | 128.0, C | ||
| 2’ | 2.32, t (7.4) | 31.7, CH2 | 107.2, C | |
| 3’ | 1.66, overlap | 22.9, CH2 | 5.03, d (8.5) | 77.5, CH |
| 4’ | 1.31, overlap | 25.8, CH2 | 2.82, dd (8.5, 6.1) | 41.3, CH |
| 5’ | 1.31, overlap | 27.4, CH2 | 2.05, m | 40.1, CH |
| 6’ | 1.31, overlap | 29.3, CH2 | 46.9, C | |
| 7’ | 1.31, overlap | 29.4, CH2 | 175.3, C | |
| 8’ | 2.05, overlap | 31.5, CH2 | 1.64, s | 22.0, CH3 |
| 9’ | 5.40, dd (10.9, 5.5) | 130.4, CH | 1.06, d (7.2) | 11.7, CH3 |
| 10’ | 5.34, dd (10.9, 6.5) | 128.2, CH | 0.88, s | 18.6, CH3 |
| 11’ | 2.74, overlap | 29.8, CH2 | ||
| 12’ | 5.34, dt (10.9, 6.5) | 128.1, CH | ||
| 13’ | 5.40, dd (10.9, 5.5) | 130.2, CH | ||
| 14’ | 2.05, overlap | 29.5, CH2 | ||
| 15’ | 1.31, overlap | 29.3, CH2 | ||
| 16’ | 1.31, overlap | 25.2, CH2 | ||
| 17’ | 1.31, overlap | 22.7, CH2 | ||
| 18’ | 0.89, t (6.8) | 14.0, CH3 | ||
| 4-OH | 4.36, s | |||
| 7-OH | 4.54, d (4.0) | |||
Figure 2Key COSY (homonuclear chemical shift correlation spectroscopy) (bold line) and HMBC (heteronuclear multiple bond correlation) (arrow) correlations of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 3NOESY (nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy) correlations of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 4Δδ values (Δδ (in ppm) = δ) obtained for the (S)-and (R)-MTPA (α-methoxy-α-(trifluoromethyl) phenylacetyl) esters of compound 6.
Antimicrobial activities of compounds 1–7 (MIC, μg/mL) a.
| Strains | Compounds | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2–6 | 7 | Positive Control | |
|
| – | – | 4.0 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.25 | – | 1.0 | 0.25 |
|
| – | – | 8.0 | 0.5 |
|
| – | – | 4.0 | 2.0 |
|
| – | – | 4.0 | 1.0 |
|
| 0.5 | – | 8.0 | 0.5 |
a (–) = MIC > 32 μg/mL; b chloramphenicol as positive control; c amphotericin B as positive control.
Figure 5Experimental and calculated ECD (electronic circular dichroism) spectra of 2.
Scheme 1Isolation procedure of compounds 1–5.