| Literature DB >> 32604845 |
Sara Štumpf1, Gregor Hostnik1, Mateja Primožič1, Maja Leitgeb1,2, Juha-Pekka Salminen3, Urban Bren1,4.
Abstract
In this study the effect of growth medium strength on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of different tannins and tannin extracts against Escherichia coli was systematically investigated for the first time. Three pure compounds (vescalagin, castalagin and gallic acid) and five extracts (chestnut, quebracho, mimosa, Colistizer and tannic acid) were studied. Broth microdilution was assayed and bacteria were grown using different growth medium strengths varying from half to double the concentration recommended by the producer. MICs were determined using the iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT) dye or turbidity measurements. It was observed that MIC values depend on the growth medium strength. With an increase in the growth medium concentration MIC values rose roughly linearly for all samples, while their relative order remained unchanged, indicating that a direct interaction of tannins with growth medium nutrients represents the likely source of their antimicrobial activity. Understanding the effect of growth medium strength can finally yield a plausible explanation for the observed variation in MIC values reported in the scientific literature as well as provide help in planning proper applications of tannins in the livestock production.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; antibacterial properties; castalagin; minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); tannins; vescalagin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32604845 PMCID: PMC7355419 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of (a) diastereoisomers castalagin (R1 = H, R2 = OH) and vescalagin (R1 = OH, R2 = H), (b) gallic acid, (c) decagalloylglucose, one of the gallotannins typically present in tannic acid.
Figure 2A comparison of MIC values, determined by measurement of the OD and by addition of the INT dye at (a) half the concentration of E. coli growth medium recommended by the producer, (b) the concentration of E. coli growth medium recommended by the producer, (c) one and a half the concentration of E. coli growth medium recommended by the producer and (d) double the concentration of E. coli growth medium recommended by the producer. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Dependence of the normalized MIC on the E. coli growth medium concentration, determined by (a) measuring OD and (b) using INT dye. MIC values were normalized with respect to the growth medium concentration recommended by the producer.