| Literature DB >> 32604733 |
Celal Cakiroglu1, Gebrail Bekdaş2, Zong Woo Geem3.
Abstract
One of the major goals in the process of designing structural components is to achieve the highest possible buckling load of the structural component while keeping the cost and weight at a minimum. This paper illustrates the application of the harmony search algorithm to the buckling load maximisation of dispersed laminated composite plates with rectangular geometry. The ply thicknesses and fiber orientation angles of the plies were chosen as the design variables. Besides the commonly used carbon fiber reinforced composites, boron/epoxy and glass/epoxy composite plates were also optimised using the harmony search algorithm. Furthermore, the optimisation algorithm was applied to plates with three different aspect ratios (ratio of the longer side length to the shorter side length of the plate). The buckling loads of the plates with optimised dispersed stacking sequences were compared to the buckling loads of plates with the commonly applied 0°, ±45°, and 90° fiber angle sequence and identical ply thicknesses. For all three aspect ratios and materials in this study, the dispersed stacking sequences performed better than the plates with regular stacking sequences.Entities:
Keywords: buckling; harmony search; laminated composite plates; meta-heuristic optimisation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32604733 PMCID: PMC7345198 DOI: 10.3390/ma13122862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Boundary constraints for the buckling analysis.
Figure 2The geometry of a laminated plate with nine layers.
Material properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) plates.
| Material Property | Carbon Fiber (CFRP) [ |
|---|---|
| E1 [N/mm2] | 157,000 |
| E2 [N/mm2] | 8500 |
| G12 [N/mm2] | 4200 |
|
| 0.35 |
Figure 3The development of the best and worst solutions in the harmony search optimisation for boron/epoxy plates.
The outcome of the harmony search optimisation for the CFRP plates.
| Material Property | a/b = 1 | a/b = 2 | a/b = 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total plate thickness (mm) | 2.25 | 2.247 | 2.248 |
| Max buck. load HS (N) | 18,337 | 18,446 | 18,722 |
| Max buck. load Führer [ | 17,947 | 18,157 | 17,916 |
| Best stacking sequence (degrees) | [−27/43/−64/62/31/−55/57/43/48] | [56/−48/58/60/31/66/40/51/−50] | [46/−40/55/29/80/3/73/46/−43] |
| Best ply thicknesses (mm) | [0.1/0.18/0.33/0.1/0.76/0.3/0.1/0.25/0.14] | [0.11/0.4/0.2/0.84/0.1/0.12/0.1/0.11/0.28] | [0.13/0.35/0.33/0.1/0.34/0.32/0.13/0.23/0.32] |
Material properties of boron/epoxy plates.
| Material Property | Carbon Fiber (CFRP) [ |
|---|---|
| E1 (N/mm2) | 207,540 |
| E2 (N/mm2) | 19,790 |
| G12 (N/mm2) | 5520 |
|
| 0.225 |
The outcome of the harmony search optimisation for the boron/epoxy plates.
| Material Property | a/b = 1 | a/b = 2 | a/b = 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total plate thickness (mm) | 2.239 | 2.249 | 2.242 |
| Max buck. load HS (N) | 25,395 | 26,000 | 24,854 |
| Max buck. load Führer [ | 24,289 | 24,606 | 24,406 |
| Best stacking sequence (degrees) | [−47/51/−29/−38/61/55/86/42/−38] | [49/64/−32/−52/21/−82/−3/49/−47] | [64/39/3/49/−43/−47/−50/44/−43] |
| Best ply thicknesses (mm) | [0.12/0.43/0.16/0.46/0.21/0.1/0.14/0.37/0.26] | [0.22/0.1/0.1/0.28/0.11/0.12/0.32/0.66/0.34] | [0.1/0.1/0.11/0.1/0.22/0.1/1.03/0.29/0.2] |
Figure 4The development of the best and worst solutions in the harmony search optimisation for boron/epoxy plates.
Material properties of fiberglass plates.
| Material Property | Fiberglass [ |
|---|---|
| E1 (N/mm2) | 33,000 |
| E2 (N/mm2) | 3100 |
| G12 (N/mm2) | 3000 |
|
| 0.26 |
The outcome of the harmony search optimisation for the fiberglass plates.
| Title 1 | a/b = 1 | a/b = 2 | a/b = 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total plate thickness (mm) | 2.244 | 2.246 | 2.248 |
| Max buck. load HS (N) | 4168 | 4270 | 4254 |
| Max buck. load Führer [ | 4069 | 4098 | 4129 |
| Best stacking sequence (degrees) | [−53/34/49/20/61/−76/−29/38/−45] | [41/50/−50/−16/−83/40/62/−51/−34] | [49/−47/68/45/−66/60/52/−36/−42] |
| Best ply thicknesses (mm) | [0.32/0.1/0.22/0.1/0.11/0.78/0.1/0.42/0.1] | [0.1/0.17/0.43/0.1/0.45/0.63/0.1/0.16/0.1] | [0.2/0.26/0.38/0.26/0.1/0.3/0.42/0.1/0.22] |
Figure 5The development of the best and worst solutions in the harmony search optimisation for fiberglass plates.
Figure 6Percentage difference between the buckling loads of the optimised plates and the plates with the stacking sequence from [28].
Figure 7Percentage difference between the buckling loads of the optimised plates and the plates with the stacking sequence from [52].