| Literature DB >> 32604721 |
Takao Kato1, Takatoshi Kasai1,2,3, Akihiro Sato1,2, Sayaki Ishiwata1,2, Shoichiro Yatsu1, Hiroki Matsumoto1, Jun Shitara1, Azusa Murata1, Megumi Shimizu1, Shoko Suda1,3, Masaru Hiki1, Ryo Naito1,2,3, Hiroyuki Daida1.
Abstract
Astaxanthin has strong antioxidant properties. We conducted a prospective pilot study on heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction to investigate improvements in cardiac function and exercise tolerance in relation to suppression of oxidative stress by 3-month astaxanthin supplementation. Oxidative stress markers-serum Diacron reactive oxygen metabolite (dROM), biological antioxidant potential (BAP), and urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) concentrations, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were assessed before and after 3-month astaxanthin supplementation. Finally, the data of 16 HF patients were analyzed. Following 3-month astaxanthin supplementation, dROM level decreased from 385.6 ± 82.6 U.CARR to 346.5 ± 56.9 U.CARR (p = 0.041) despite no changes in BAP and urinary 8-OHdG levels. LVEF increased from 34.1 ± 8.6% to 38.0 ± 10.0% (p = 0.031) and 6MWD increased from 393.4 ± 95.9 m to 432.8 ± 93.3 m (p = 0.023). Significant relationships were observed between percent changes in dROM level and those in LVEF. In this study, following 3-month astaxanthin supplementation, suppressed oxidative stress and improved cardiac contractility and exercise tolerance were observed in HF patients with LV systolic dysfunction. Correlation between suppression of oxidative stress and improvement of cardiac contractility suggests that suppression of oxidative stress by astaxanthin supplementation had therapeutic potential to improve cardiac functioning.Entities:
Keywords: 6-min walk test; antioxidant; left ventricular ejection fraction; oxidative stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32604721 PMCID: PMC7353230 DOI: 10.3390/nu12061896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Baseline characteristics.
|
| 67.4 ± 14.9 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.3 ± 3.8 |
| Women, | 3 (19) |
| NYHA class II, | 15 (94) |
| III, | 1 (6) |
| LVEF, % | 34.1 ± 8.6 |
| Ischemic etiology, | 7 (44) |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 4 (25) |
| eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2, | 10 (63) |
|
| |
| ACE-Is/ARBs, | 15 (94) |
| Beta blockers, | 16 (100) |
| MR antagonists, | 12 (75) |
| Diuretics, | 14 (87) |
ACE-I, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MR, mineral corticoid receptor; NYHA, New York Heart Association.3.2. Changes in measurements from baseline to 3 months.
Changes in parameters from baseline to 3 months other than dROM, LVEF, and 6MWD.
| Baseline | 3 Months |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight, kg | 60.4 ± 9.8 | 61.3 ± 10.5 | 0.131 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 112.5 ± 18.2 | 109.8 ± 17.4 | 0.472 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 60.3 ± 9.8 | 62.1 ± 10.5 | 0.485 |
| Heart rate, /min | 70.9 ± 9.5 | 68.3 ± 11.7 | 0.286 |
| Serum TNF-α, pg/mL | 1.61 ± 0.54 | 1.65 ± 0.65 | 0.864 |
| Serum CRP, mg/dL | 0.15 [0.20] | 0.10 [0.05] | 0.437 |
| Plasma BAP, μmol/L | 2012.0 [203.5] | 2003.5 [240.5] | 0.756 |
| Urine ratio of 8-OHdG/Cr, ng/mgCre | 27.2 ± 13.8 | 29.4 ± 9.3 | 0.179 |
| Plasma BNP, pg/mL | 196.9 [255.7] | 152.7 [201.0] | 0.301 |
| LVEDVI, mL/m2 | 105.7 ± 28.4 | 101.2 ± 27.5 | 0.326 |
| LVESVI, mL/m2 | 71.3 ± 26.8 | 65.1 ± 25.5 | 0.098 |
| E/e’ | 18.2 ± 9.4 | 13.9 ± 7.6 | 0.134 |
| RVSP, mmHg | 34.9 ± 15.4 | 29.6 ± 9.6 | 0.133 |
| Inferior vena cava, mm | 13.0 ± 4.2 | 13.1 ± 3.3 | 0.943 |
BAP, biological antioxidant potential; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; dROM, diacron reactive oxygen metabolites; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; LVEDVI, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESVI, left ventricular end-systolic volume index; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; 6MWD, six-minute walk distance; TNF, tumor necrotic factor.
Figure 1Changes in dROM from baseline to 3 months. dROM decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after starting astaxanthin supplementation. Abbreviations: dROM, diacron reactive oxygen metabolites.
Figure 2Changes in LVEF from baseline to 3 months. LVEF increased significantly from baseline to 3 months after starting astaxanthin supplementation. Abbreviations: LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 3Changes in 6MWD from baseline to 3 months. 6MWD increased significantly from baseline to 3 months after starting astaxanthin supplementation. Abbreviations: 6MWD, 6-min walk distance.
Figure 4Correlation between the baseline dROM level and the %Δ in dROM level from baseline to 3 months. The greater the baseline dROM level, the greater the reduction in dROM level.Abbreviations: dROM, Diacron reactive oxygen metabolites.
Correlation coefficients and p-values for relationships between changes in astaxanthin level, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and cardiac functions from baseline to 3 months.
| %ΔLVEF | %ΔLVEDVI | %ΔLVESVI | %ΔE/e’ | %ΔRVSP | %ΔBNP | %Δ6MWD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δastaxanthin | 0.138 | −0.044 | −0.053 | 0.324 | 0.454 | 0.097 | −0.126 |
| %ΔTNF-α | −0.134 | −0.216 | −0.119 | 0.042 | −0.395 | −0.268 | 0.441 |
| %ΔCRP | −0.397 | 0.090 | 0.237 | −0.307 | 0.062 | 0.237 | −0.230 |
| %ΔdROM | −0.509 | 0.706 | 0.774 | 0.309 | 0.354 | 0.276 | −0.015 |
| %ΔBAP | −0.021 | −0.071 | −0.015 | −0.362 | −0.454 | −0.238 | 0.306 |
| %Δ8-OHdG | 0.006 | −0.033 | −0.004 | −0.213 | 0.102 | 0.266 | 0.148 |
BAP, biological antioxidant potential; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; dROM, diacron reactive oxygen metabolites; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; LVEDVI, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESVI, left ventricular end-systolic volume index; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; 6MWD, six minute walk distance; TNF, tumor necrotic factor.