Literature DB >> 32603509

Sex and gender differences in the outcome of patients with COVID-19.

Shahab Falahi1, Azra Kenarkoohi2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32603509      PMCID: PMC7361270          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) pandemic is a new wave of emerging infections that the world is struggling with. There are many unanswered questions in this regard, including sex‐specific outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). The clinical consequences of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection vary from asymptomatic to severe or critical. Nearly 80% of cases are asymptomatic or with mild symptoms, 15% have severe disease and 5% become critical. Gender and age are major risk factors for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. In addition to the effect of these factors on the prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2, the clinical outcome varies according to both of them. One study found that in similar age groups, outcomes of COVID‐19 were more severe in men compared to women, as observed in SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome infections. Other investigators reported that the highest mortality rate was found in older men with underlying diseases. Another study also reported that men with COVID‐19 had worse outcomes. In several country affected by SARSC‐OV‐2 pandemic, most people who die from COVID‐19 are men. These studies suggest that men are more susceptible to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and its clinical outcomes are more severe in men than in women. The potential factors influencing these gender‐dependent differences, should be clarified. Numerous factors, such as the immune system, sex hormones, physiological factors, lifestyle, and sociocultural behaviors are likely to be responsible for these differences. Here we refer to some influential factors: One of the possible factors causing different outcome of patients with COVID‐19 between two sexes is the immune system. In dealing with viral infections, women's immune systems act differently from men, which create a stronger immune response leading to viral clearance. In general, antibody production level is higher in women compare with men and last longer. Differences in women's immune responses can be related to sex hormones and factors related to chromosome X. Estrogen modulates pro‐inflammatory responses as well as immune regulatory genes are located on chromosome X so it can be assumed that, the cytokine storm linked to immune dysregulation, occurs less in women compared with men. So far, researchers believe that the cytokine storm is responsible for lung tissue damage and immunopathogenesis of COVID‐19 infection. Interleukin‐6 is an important component of the cytokine storm and the driving force of the storm, as its level in men is higher than in women. High levels of interleukin 6 in men may be related to worse outcomes against women, can indicating a higher risk of cytokine storm formation in male patients. One study showed that levels of neutralizing antibodies are higher in women with severe COVID‐19 than its level in men. Also, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody has been identified more frequently in the early stages of COVID‐19 infection in women, indicating that production of antibodies, specially IgG, in the early days of infection may prevent the disease from progressing and getting worse. In short, more antibody production and a lower chance of immune dysregulation in women, may explain the gender differences of outcome during COVID‐19 infection according to the immune system. The second factor related to outcome, is the gender‐specific difference in the respiratory tract properties. It may be worth noting that men's lungs are larger than women's  and is a larger fertile ground to support more SARS‐COV‐2 replication in men. elevated virus replication leads to higher viral load and exacerbation of the COVID‐19 disease. Another factor is angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a viral receptor. There is conflict in evidence about ACE2 expression levels and its exact role (protective or not) in COVID‐19 infection. ACE2, on the one hand, is a receptor for virus entry to cells, and its higher expression as a viral receptor should exacerbate the infection. On the other hand, it is a key enzyme that prevents lung damage. ACE2 role in the pathogenesis of SARSC‐OV‐2 remains a mystery. one study indicates men have more ACE2 on the endothelium of the pulmonary vessels than women, and has a widespread distribution in men's lungs that at least five different cell type express this receptor, while fewer types of cells in women's lunges expose ACE2. Since the lung is the main tissue involved in the COVID‐19 pathogenesis, , a further expression of the ACE2 in this site can lead to an increase in the disease severity. A recent study reported that ACE2 had a higher expression in different tissues of women, and also believe that high levels of ACE2 in women play a protective role against the COVID‐19 infection. ACE2 has two biological forms, membrane‐bound and a soluble form. The membrane‐bound form acts as a virus receptor, and its presence exacerbates infection outcome, while its soluble form prevents the virus from attaching to cells and plays a protective role, like neutralizing antibodies. Circulating ACE2 level (soluble form) appears to be higher in women and children than in men, so may play a protective role in these subjects  by Competitive inhibition of virus attachment and entry to the target cells. Circulating ACE2 level can act as a contributing factor in determining the disease severity. it is recommended that more studies should be designed and implemented in the area of ACE2 role, protective or damaging, in pathogenesis and outcome of COVID‐19 infection. Among other factors that cause sex differences in the outcome of COVID‐19, sex hormones should not be overlooked. As mentioned previously, sex hormones affect immune responses. , Some studies suggested, estrogen therapy has remarkable role in developing a protective immune responses against COVID‐19. Due to the age‐dependent decrease of sex hormones in older people, these hormones can be suggested as therapeutic options, and may help to reduce inflammation in elderly patients with COVID‐19. The higher mortality rate in men seems to be partly related to the frequency of underlying diseases. One of the most common comorbidities in the development of severe COVID‐19 is cardiovascular disease and also testosterone activates the main pathway of myocardial inflammation while estrogen has a protective effect on cardiovascular disease. Another cause of gender‐based disparities is lifestyle, such as smoking. According to one study, COVID‐19 was more severe in smokers than in non‐smokers, since men are more likely to smoke than women, smoking can be a potential factor in this disparity. Although we pointed out some possible factors contributing to sex and gender‐based discrepancy, but since age is also a risk factor for COVID‐19 severity and mortality, comparison of the COVID‐19 outcome in both sexes should be performed after age matching.
  16 in total

1.  Prevention and therapy of COVID-19 via exogenous estrogen treatment for both male and female patients.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Suba
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 2.  Metabolic impact of sex hormones on obesity.

Authors:  Lynda M Brown; Lana Gent; Kathryn Davis; Deborah J Clegg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Sex differences in respiratory function.

Authors:  Antonella LoMauro; Andrea Aliverti
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2018-06

4.  Review of the Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Fang Jiang; Liehua Deng; Liangqing Zhang; Yin Cai; Chi Wai Cheung; Zhengyuan Xia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Sex differences in inflammation, redox biology, mitochondria and autoimmunity.

Authors:  Damian N Di Florio; Jon Sin; Michael J Coronado; Paldeep S Atwal; DeLisa Fairweather
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 11.799

Review 6.  Sex Hormones and Novel Corona Virus Infectious Disease (COVID-19).

Authors:  Rasha A Al-Lami; Randall J Urban; Elena Volpi; Ammar M A Algburi; Jacques Baillargeon
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  COVID-19 Infection and Circulating ACE2 Levels: Protective Role in Women and Children.

Authors:  Elena Ciaglia; Carmine Vecchione; Annibale Alessandro Puca
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Lei Shi; Yijin Wang; Jiyuan Zhang; Lei Huang; Chao Zhang; Shuhong Liu; Peng Zhao; Hongxia Liu; Li Zhu; Yanhong Tai; Changqing Bai; Tingting Gao; Jinwen Song; Peng Xia; Jinghui Dong; Jingmin Zhao; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 30.700

9.  COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak.

Authors:  Clare Wenham; Julia Smith; Rosemary Morgan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Huan Han; Fang Liu; Zhihua Lv; Kailang Wu; Yingle Liu; Yong Feng; Chengliang Zhu
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  22 in total

1.  Comparing COVID-19 fatality across countries: a synthetic demographic indicator.

Authors:  Simona Bignami-Van Assche; Daniela Ghio
Journal:  J Popul Res (Canberra)       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 2.  Sufficient Sleep, Time of Vaccination, and Vaccine Efficacy: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence and a Proposal for COVID-19 Vaccination.

Authors:  Esmail Rayatdoost; Mohammad Rahmanian; Mohammad Sadegh Sanie; Jila Rahmanian; Sara Matin; Navid Kalani; Azra Kenarkoohi; Shahab Falahi; Amir Abdoli
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Features and Outcomes of Confirmed COVID-19 Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Diyaa H Bokhary; Nidal H Bokhary; Lamees E Seadawi; Ahlam M Moafa; Hashim H Khairallah; Abdullah Bakhsh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-29

4.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding COVID-19 Among Chronic Illness Patients at Outpatient Departments in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Authors:  Giao Huynh; Minh Quan Nguyen; Thien Thuan Tran; Van Tap Nguyen; Truong Vien Nguyen; Thi Hoai Thuong Do; Phi Hong Ngan Nguyen; Thi Hoai Yen Phan; Thanh Thuy Vu; Thi Ngoc Han Nguyen
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-09-14

Review 5.  COVID-19-associated opportunistic infections: a snapshot on the current reports.

Authors:  Amir Abdoli; Shahab Falahi; Azra Kenarkoohi
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.057

6.  COVID-19: Is there a weaker sex?

Authors:  Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa; Nina Van Poll; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 7.  Claims and reasons about mild COVID-19 in children.

Authors:  S Falahi; A Abdoli; A Kenarkoohi
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2021-03-17

8.  Inflammatory laboratory findings associated with severe illness among hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 in Medan, Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Darmadi Darmadi; Cennikon Pakpahan; Riska Habriel Ruslie; Andri Rezano
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-06

9.  SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate and seroprevalence of related antibodies among a sample of patients in Cairo: Pre-wave 2 results of a screening program in a university hospital.

Authors:  Samia A Girgis; Hala M Hafez; Hoda Ezz Elarab; Basma Sherif; Moshira H Sabry; Iman Afifi; Fatma Elzahraa Hassan; Amira Reda; Shaimaa Elsayed; Asmaa Mahmoud; Petra Habeb; Ihab S Habil; Rasha S Hussein; Isis M Mossad; Ossama Mansour; Ashraf Omar; Ayman M Saleh; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: characterisation of cases and risk factors for severe outcomes, as at 27 April 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.