Literature DB >> 32602828

Relationship of Tumor Radiation-absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with 90Y in the SARAH Study.

Anne-Laure Hermann1, Arnaud Dieudonné1, Maxime Ronot1, Manuel Sanchez1, Helena Pereira1, Gilles Chatellier1, Etienne Garin1, Laurent Castera1, Rachida Lebtahi1, Valérie Vilgrain1.   

Abstract

Background Little is known about factors that influence the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Purpose To determine the relationship between tumor radiation-absorbed dose and survival and tumor response in locally advanced inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data (between December 2011 and March 2015) from participants who received TARE in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SARAH) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01482442). Tumor-absorbed dose was computed using technetium 99m (99mTc) macroaggregated human albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT. Visual agreement among CT, 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT, and yttrium 90 (90Y) SPECT/CT or PET/CT was scored as optimal, suboptimal, or not optimal. Overall survival (OS) and tumor response at 6-month follow-up CT (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) were assessed. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier tests. A propensity score comparing participants receiving a tumor dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy (best cut-off according to the receiver operating characteristic curve and median tumor radiation-absorbed dose values in the study groups) with those receiving sorafenib was calculated. Results One hundred twenty-one participants (median age, 67 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 61-73 years; 110 men) were evaluated in the dose-survival group, and 109 (median age, 66 years; IQR: 61-71 years; 100 men) were evaluated in the dose-tumor response group. In the dose-survival group, median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7 months, 10.7 months), and median tumor radiation-absorbed dose was 112 Gy (IQR: 68-220 Gy). Participants who received at least 100 Gy (n = 67) had longer survival than those who received less than 100 Gy (median, 14.1 months [95% CI: 9.6 months, 18.6 months] vs 6.1 months [95% CI: 4.9 months, 6.8 months], respectively; P < .001), and those with optimal agreement (n = 24) had the longest median OS (24.9 months; 95% CI: 9.6 months, 33.9 months). In the dose-tumor response group, tumor radiation-absorbed dose was higher in participants with disease control versus those with progressive disease (median, 121 Gy [IQR: 86-190 Gy] vs 85 Gy [IQR: 58-164 Gy]; P = .02). The highest disease control rate was observed in 31 of 40 participants (78%) with a tumor radiation-absorbed dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy and optimal agreement. Conclusion Higher tumor radiation-absorbed dose computed at technetium 99m macroaggregated human albumin SPECT/CT was associated with better overall survival and disease control in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization with yttrium 90 in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma trial. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sofocleous and Kamarinos in this issue.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32602828     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

Review 1.  Current locoregional therapies and treatment strategies in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  L Cardarelli-Leite; A Hadjivassiliou; D Klass; J Chung; S G F Ho; H J Lim; P T W Kim; A Mujoomdar; D M Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  The Role of Catheter-Directed CT-Angiography in Radioembolisation.

Authors:  Kun Da Zhuang; Aaron Kian-Ti Tong; David Chee Eng Ng; Kiang Hiong Tay
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Computational Modeling of Radioembolization: How to Calculate Infinity.

Authors:  Beau Toskich; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Trans-arterial Radioembolization Dosimetry in 2022.

Authors:  Etienne Garin; Boris Guiu; Julien Edeline; Yan Rolland; Xavier Palard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  TCP post-radioembolization and TCP post-EBRT in HCC are similar and can be predicted using the in vitro radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Stephan Walrand; Michel Hesse; Ivan Borbath; Renaud Lhommel; François Jamar
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Dose-Response and Dose-Toxicity Relationships for Glass 90Y Radioembolization in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  International recommendations for personalised selective internal radiation therapy of primary and metastatic liver diseases with yttrium-90 resin microspheres.

Authors:  Hugo Levillain; Oreste Bagni; Christophe M Deroose; Arnaud Dieudonné; Silvano Gnesin; Oliver S Grosser; S Cheenu Kappadath; Andrew Kennedy; Nima Kokabi; David M Liu; David C Madoff; Armeen Mahvash; Antonio Martinez de la Cuesta; David C E Ng; Philipp M Paprottka; Cinzia Pettinato; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Lidia Strigari; Daniel Y Sze; Berlinda J de Wit van der Veen; Patrick Flamen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Dose-response relationship after yttrium-90-radioembolization with glass microspheres in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

Authors:  Sander C Ebbers; Caren van Roekel; Manon N G J A Braat; Maarten W Barentsz; Marnix G E H Lam; Arthur J A T Braat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy and Glass 90Y Radioembolization with Personalized Dosimetry: Dynamic Changes in Treated and Nontreated Liver.

Authors:  Carole Allimant; Emmanuel Deshayes; Marilyne Kafrouni; Lore Santoro; Delphine de Verbizier; Marjolaine Fourcade; Christophe Cassinotto; Margaux Hermida; Chloé Guillot; Denis Mariano-Goulart; Boris Guiu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 10.  Microspheres Used in Liver Radioembolization: From Conception to Clinical Effects.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Michel Hesse; Amandine Louppe; Renaud Lhommel; Stephan Walrand; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.