| Literature DB >> 32602379 |
Nicole A Vasilevsky1, Mohammad Hosseini2, Samantha Teplitzky3, Violeta Ilik4, Ehsan Mohammadi5, Juliane Schneider6, Barbara Kern7, Julien Colomb8, Scott C Edmunds9, Karen Gutzman10, Daniel S Himmelstein11, Marijane White12, Britton Smith13, Lisa O'Keefe10, Melissa Haendel1, Kristi L Holmes10,14.
Abstract
Assigning authorship and recognizing contributions to scholarly works is challenging on many levels. Here we discuss ethical, social, and technical challenges to the concept of authorship that may impede the recognition of contributions to a scholarly work. Recent work in the field of authorship shows that shifting to a more inclusive contributorship approach may address these challenges. Recent efforts to enable better recognition of contributions to scholarship include the development of the Contributor Role Ontology (CRO), which extends the CRediT taxonomy and can be used in information systems for structuring contributions. We also introduce the Contributor Attribution Model (CAM), which provides a simple data model that relates the contributor to research objects via the role that they played, as well as the provenance of the information. Finally, requirements for the adoption of a contributorship-based approach are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Attribution; authorship; contributorship; peer review; publication ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32602379 PMCID: PMC7736357 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1779591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622