Takashi Shida1, Natsumi Oshida2, Hideo Suzuki3, Kosuke Okada1, Takahisa Watahiki4, Sechang Oh5, Taeho Kim5, Tomonori Isobe6, Yoshikazu Okamoto7, Shun-Ichi Ariizumi8, Masakazu Yamamoto8, Junichi Shoda6. 1. Tsukuba Preventive Medicine, Research Center, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan. 2. Division of Laboratory Medicine, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 4. Doctoral Program in Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 5. The Center for Sports Medicine and Health Sciences, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan. 6. Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 7. Division of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 8. Institute of Gastroenterology Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
AIM: The underlying mechanism of non-obese non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has not been fully elucidated. We classified patients with NAFLD by sex and body mass index and compared their clinical features to clarify the background pathophysiology of non-obese NAFLD. METHODS: A total of 404 patients with NAFLD were divided according to their body mass index (<25 [non-obese], 25 to <30 [obese], and ≥30 [severe obese]), and were further compared with 253 patients without obesity and NAFLD (non-NAFLD). RESULTS: The proportion of the individuals with non-obese NAFLD was 25.7% in men and 27.6% in women. The male and female non-obese NAFLD groups had lower skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength than the obese NAFLD groups. The visceral fat area, although low, was ≥100 cm2 in 59.3% of men and 43.8% of women. An increase in liver fat accumulation, hepatic fibrosis, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and leptin levels was modest in the non-obese NAFLD group compared with a marked increase in the obese NAFLD groups. The muscle mass of the non-obese NAFLD group was similar to that of the non-NAFLD group, but muscle steatosis was particularly common among women. Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors contributing to increased liver fat accumulation in the non-obese NAFLD group were visceral fat area, HbA1c, myostatin, and leptin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-obese NAFLD, a sex difference was observed in the clinical features. In addition to increased visceral fat, decreased muscle mass and muscle strength, muscle atrophy (presarcopenia), and impaired glucose tolerance were considered to be important pathophysiological factors.
AIM: The underlying mechanism of non-obese non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has not been fully elucidated. We classified patients with NAFLD by sex and body mass index and compared their clinical features to clarify the background pathophysiology of non-obese NAFLD. METHODS: A total of 404 patients with NAFLD were divided according to their body mass index (<25 [non-obese], 25 to <30 [obese], and ≥30 [severe obese]), and were further compared with 253 patients without obesity and NAFLD (non-NAFLD). RESULTS: The proportion of the individuals with non-obese NAFLD was 25.7% in men and 27.6% in women. The male and female non-obese NAFLD groups had lower skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength than the obese NAFLD groups. The visceral fat area, although low, was ≥100 cm2 in 59.3% of men and 43.8% of women. An increase in liver fat accumulation, hepatic fibrosis, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and leptin levels was modest in the non-obese NAFLD group compared with a marked increase in the obese NAFLD groups. The muscle mass of the non-obese NAFLD group was similar to that of the non-NAFLD group, but muscle steatosis was particularly common among women. Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors contributing to increased liver fat accumulation in the non-obese NAFLD group were visceral fat area, HbA1c, myostatin, and leptin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-obese NAFLD, a sex difference was observed in the clinical features. In addition to increased visceral fat, decreased muscle mass and muscle strength, muscle atrophy (presarcopenia), and impaired glucose tolerance were considered to be important pathophysiological factors.