Literature DB >> 32602111

The COVID-19 Airway Management Isolation Chamber (CAMIC) for Ears.

Anthony M Tolisano1,2, Timothy C Blood1, Charles A Riley2,3, Douglas S Ruhl2,4, Steven S Hong1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19, personal protective equipment, middle ear, mastoid

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32602111      PMCID: PMC7361893          DOI: 10.1002/lary.28942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   2.970


× No keyword cloud information.
View Video S1 Laryngoscope, 2020

INTRODUCTION

The novel coronavirus pandemic resulting in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has led to a dramatic change in surgical practices across the world. Otolaryngologists in particular have a high risk for exposure to aerosolized virus particles when performing airway and endonasal surgeries. Early reports from Wuhan, China, demonstrated this increased risk to surgeons and operating room personnel when these surgeries were performed on infected patients. Because middle ear and mastoid mucosa are continuous extensions of respiratory epithelium, the potential risks of exposure to COVID‐19 remain a serious concern for ear surgeons. Currently, many hospitals across the United States are limiting surgical interventions to those patients with acute, life‐threatening conditions such as cancer or trauma. Unfortunately, due to extended delays and prolonged access to care for non‐COVID‐19–related pathologies, surgeries that were once considered elective have now become increasingly more urgent to address as diseases progress. Cholesteatoma, a condition that requires surgical extirpation and for which no reasonable medical alternatives exist, is one example of a common pathology that mandates prompt surgical intervention. Left untreated, cholesteatoma has myriad risks, not the least of which is continued growth that can adversely affect treatment outcomes. Currently, recommendations for personal protective equipment (PPE) mandate utilizing either an N‐95 respirator with a face shield or a powered, air‐purifying respirator (PAPR) for most otolaryngologic surgeries. Recently, the COVID‐19 Airway Management Isolation Chamber (CAMIC) was developed by our group as adjunctive PPE that functions as a self‐contained negative pressure system to enhance safe management of the airway. This study will provide an overview of an otologic modification to the CAMIC (CAMIC‐Ear) for a patient that required urgent ear surgery during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

METHODS

The Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (Bethesda, MD) Institutional Review Board provided oversight and approval for this initial proof of concept project (WRNMMC‐EDO‐2020‐0471). An emergency‐use authorization has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (#PEUA200438) to include detailed assembly and disassembly instructions for the CAMIC design. Preliminary, ex vivo data in a separate multi‐institutional study to evaluate the original CAMIC design was performed. Assessments for aerosol and particle leak were obtained utilizing industrial‐grade condensation particle counters for a smoke model (for ultrafine particles) and a nebulizer model (for microdroplets and aerosol particles). Our group found the CAMIC contained the particulate within the system without significant leak. With the suction delivered through the CAMIC, both smoke and nebulized particles were removed over time. In a third arm, a “working port” was created to accommodate a surgeon's hand into the chamber. No discernible leak was identified when suction was attached to the system despite this fenestration. With this preliminary data, we modified the CAMIC for this urgent otologic surgery (see Video S1). The original design and ex vivo data will be published shortly. The CAMIC‐Ear system can be created by using ½‐inch schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes with ¼‐inch holes drilled every 3 inches in order to create a hollow frame with fenestrations to facilitate vacuum suction. The frame consists of six 18‐inch, two 15‐inch, and two 3‐inch length PVC pipe sections; six 90° elbows; two 45° elbows; and two blind end caps (see Fig. 1). The frame can be readily disassembled and sterilized using a low‐temperature (< 55°C) gas plasma sterilizer system with hydrogen peroxide vapor such as the STERRAD 100 (ASP, Irvine, CA) and repackaged for use in the operating room. After the patient is intubated, prepped, and draped, the CAMIC‐Ear frame is sterilely placed around the head, neck, and shoulders of the patient and secured using a sterile suction hose fastened around the operative table. A transverse arm board is placed at the head of the operative table to increase space for the frame. Suction is attached and distributed via the frame at its two ports. A microscope drape (Carl Zeiss, OPMI Drape, Germany) is attached in the usual fashion to the microscope but then reversed over the CAMIC frame to complete the self‐contained environment, and two sterile bags are attached to the microscope hand controls (see Fig. 2). Two cutouts just large enough to allow one's forearms to pass through are made for the surgeon's hands, and one is made for the scrub technician to facilitate the passing of instruments.
Fig 1

Disassembled CAMIC‐Ear demonstrating its pieces, including six 18‐inch, two 15‐inch, and two 3‐inch length PVC pipe sections; six 90° elbows; two 45° elbows; and two blind end caps. PVC = polyvinyl chloride.

Fig 2

Operative room setup with the CAMIC‐Ear placed sterilely and attached with the reversed microscope drape. Sterile bags attached to the microscope handpieces (yellow stars) are visible.

Disassembled CAMIC‐Ear demonstrating its pieces, including six 18‐inch, two 15‐inch, and two 3‐inch length PVC pipe sections; six 90° elbows; two 45° elbows; and two blind end caps. PVC = polyvinyl chloride. Operative room setup with the CAMIC‐Ear placed sterilely and attached with the reversed microscope drape. Sterile bags attached to the microscope handpieces (yellow stars) are visible.

RESULTS

A single patient with mesotympanic cholesteatoma and unsafe ear requiring urgent surgery was consented for tympanoplasty and possible mastoidectomy. The patient had been identified to have cholesteatoma 6 months earlier but was unable to have surgery due to a change in the military duty station and had developed worsening otorrhea and hearing loss. Consent for the procedure, including use of the CAMIC‐Ear and intraoperative photography, was obtained from the patient. Same‐day COVID‐19 testing is not available at our facility; therefore, preoperative COVID‐19 testing was performed 2 days prior to surgery, and the patient tested negative. The operating room staff wore N‐95 masks for the duration of the case. An endoscopic‐assisted tympanoplasty for removal of the cholesteatoma was performed in the standard fashion. A mastoidectomy was not required for complete disease removal. The procedure was performed without complication, and the patient was discharged home the same day. The CAMIC‐Ear was considered ergonomically satisfactory by the operating surgeon and scrub technician.

DISCUSSION

The global coronavirus pandemic has drastically altered the timeline for which elective and nonurgent surgeries are performed. Most otologic surgery is considered routine and nonurgent, although notable exceptions exist, including unsafe cholesteatoma, complications of acute otitis media and mastoiditis, and large lateral skull base tumors causing brainstem compression. Concerns about coronavirus aerosolization exist due to the prominent use of the high‐powered otologic drill and the fact that the middle ear cleft is directly connected to the nasopharynx via the Eustachian tube (the site considered the highest concentration for coronavirus inoculation). Utilization of proper PPE is critical to protect the surgeon and operating room staff. However, use of a microscope with a face shield or PAPR is cumbersome. We have developed the CAMIC‐Ear as an adjunctive PPE device that may circumvent the needs for a face shield or PAPR and can be utilized to facilitate both otomicroscopy and endoscopic ear surgery. The hollow PVC frame with attached suction creates an isolation chamber for the operative field that contains and evacuates potentially infective particles. Although rapid widespread COVID‐19 and antibody testing for patients and operative room staff would be ideal, this is not currently feasible or available at most institutions. Moreover, false‐negative rates for certain tests remain a concern. Therefore, it is incumbent to treat all patients as potential asymptomatic carriers for COVID‐19, necessitating the continued use of proper PPE.

CONCLUSION

The CAMIC‐Ear system serves as an adjunct PPE device, supports safe and effective ear surgery, and can be readily used for endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Video S1. The COVID‐19 Airway Management Isolation Chamber (CAMIC) for Ears. Click here for additional data file.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Upper respiratory tract sampling in COVID-19.

Authors:  A Mawaddah; H S Gendeh; S G Lum; M B Marina
Journal:  Malays J Pathol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Alan D Workman; D Bradley Welling; Bob S Carter; William T Curry; Eric H Holbrook; Stacey T Gray; George A Scangas; Benjamin S Bleier
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  COVID-19 pandemic: Effects and evidence-based recommendations for otolaryngology and head and neck surgery practice.

Authors:  Luiz P Kowalski; Alvaro Sanabria; John A Ridge; Wai Tong Ng; Remco de Bree; Alessandra Rinaldo; Robert P Takes; Antti A Mäkitie; Andre L Carvalho; Carol R Bradford; Vinidh Paleri; Dana M Hartl; Vincent Vander Poorten; Iain J Nixon; Cesare Piazza; Peter D Lacy; Juan P Rodrigo; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; William M Mendenhall; Anil D'Cruz; Anne W M Lee; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  A COVID-19 Patient Who Underwent Endonasal Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Wende Zhu; Xing Huang; Hongyang Zhao; Xiaobing Jiang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and surgical innovations in otolaryngology for adult and paediatric patients during the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Paolo Petrone; Emanuela Birocchi; Cesare Miani; Roberta Anzivino; Pasqua Irene Sciancalepore; Antonio Di Mauro; Paolo Dalena; Cosimo Russo; Vincenzo De Ceglie; Maurizio Masciavè; Maria Luisa Fiorella
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.618

Review 2.  Dissemination of Information During Public Health Crises: Early COVID-19 Data From The Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Alexander Chern; Samuel H Selesnick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Innovations in otorhinolaryngology in the age of COVID-19: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  E Berryhill McCarty; Liuba Soldatova; Jason A Brant; Jason G Newman
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 4.  Otitis Media Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Tal Marom; Jacob Pitaro; Udayan K Shah; Sara Torretta; Paola Marchisio; Ayan T Kumar; Patrick C Barth; Sharon Ovnat Tamir
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.