Literature DB >> 32601723

Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies.

Takele T Desta1, Tewodros Mulugeta2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This piece of work proposes a way for the wise management of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.
METHODS: This work encompassed a review of relevant literature and synthesized the critical thoughts on the proper management of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. RESULT: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) overwhelmingly challenges the competency of the digital generation. Consequently, public had been left stranded, helpless and anxious, especially during the peak season of the pandemic. However, this crisis creates a conducive environment for pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to proliferate. Pseudoscience and conspiracy theories negatively impacted the effort made to contain COVID-19.
CONCLUSION: This piece of work, however, argues that although pseudoscience and conspiracy theories are real threats to conventional science, effort needs to be made to develop a sort of database to archive and curate them for downstream use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curate; Downstream uses; Pseudoscience and conspiracy theories database

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32601723      PMCID: PMC7323368          DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01412-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


The aggressive severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated—coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is undoubtedly extraordinary challenge mankind has ever confronted since World War II. Currently, COVID-19 has been confirmed in more than 200 countries and has caused millions of illnesses and hundreds of thousands of deaths in the detected cases (Worldometer 2020), which firmly come upon competencies of the modern-day the-state-of- art knowledge and has imposed a widespread shock and plunge in the global economy. High fatality and infectivity of the circulating COVID-19 and the widespread use of mainstream and social media have created a favourable environment for pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to ride at liberty the global air. Consequently, they have effortlessly and repeatedly rapped thoughts of billions of people who have been anxious and wearing of when and how the pandemic could last. Hot and debatable issues like the ones triggered by the novel COVID-19 provide a fertile ground for pseudoscience and conspiracy theories to proliferate (Marchal et al. 2020; Institute for Strategic Dialogue 2020). These unfounded speculations mis(dis)inform the public—which in turn jeopardizes the effort made to manage the COVID-19 crisis. Irrefutably, our understanding of the aetiology of COVID-19 is evolving and developing rapidly—making the media swamp with a growing surge of mis(dis)information (Earnshaw and Katz 2020). Nonetheless, with the mere absence of curative and preventive treatments, containing the pandemic primarily relies upon social and behavioural changes (Eaton and Kalichman 2020)—change in social norms, however, could be easily ambushed by circulating infectious conspiracies. The forge of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories on COVID-19 treatments is pronounced by traditional healers and cocky politicians who are themselves not well-aware of the condition the public is living in and the nature of the virus. For example, to our surprise, Madagascar has announced with diligence the invention of home-brewed remedy to COVID-19 amidst a surge of anxiety although the protocols adopted and the compounds used to produce the thought to be medicine have been remained vague. Traditional healers and even the public prescribe traditional medicines and ritualize to evade COVID-19 or widely prophesize on the fate of the pandemic. Plants like garlic, ginger, hot pepper, lemon have been widely recommended to reduce the impact of the pandemic. Though these plants may possess some anti-viral compounds and they are normally included in our daily meals, their efficacy against the COVID-19 would be the subject of further studies. It has also been noted that high profile politicians, barely knowing the health profession, have tried to prescribe treatments to ease the suffering of COVID-19 patients. There is politically motivated high echoing rumour whether the virus was naturally evolved, escaped from a lab, or artificially created to serve as a bioweapon (Larson 2020). Intentionally, misinformation could also be fabricated for the conspiracist advantage. However, it is natural to widely speculate when peoples are anxious and feeling helpless amidst the crisis, and when technical capacities and resources are limited to fight with the pandemic. For example, in the less developed countries, peoples have been busy while praying on and/or swearing of the pandemic. In this regard, it is important to understand the local context before blaming at circulating unfounded thoughts. Moreover, some of the pseudoscience and conspiracy theories could create unanticipated opportunities if they are thoroughly ratified and classified into reliable, questionable, misleading, conspiratorial, or inaccurate information. Interestingly, efforts have been made to quantify the spread and infectivity of unfounded speculations (Gallotti et al. 2020). We recommend creating a worldwide database to archive all sorts of speculations and to develop a pipeline to curate this information, and to utilize those validated thoughts and practices in downstream mitigation strategies. As it was recommended by Larson (Larson 2020) sooner than blocking the speculations, it is advisable to create behavioural change to confer adaptive immunity against devastative and false information to intensify the battle against pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.
  3 in total

1.  Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Assessing the risks of 'infodemics' in response to COVID-19 epidemics.

Authors:  Riccardo Gallotti; Francesco Valle; Nicola Castaldo; Pierluigi Sacco; Manlio De Domenico
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Social and behavioral health responses to COVID-19: lessons learned from four decades of an HIV pandemic.

Authors:  Lisa A Eaton; Seth C Kalichman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-04-25
  3 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mis-Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez; Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez; Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo; Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco; Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas; Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo; Álvaro Bustamante-Sánchez; José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  COVID-19 Pandemic on Fire: Evolved Propensities for Nocturnal Activities as a Liability Against Epidemiological Control.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Severi Luoto; Rafael Bento da Silva Soares; Jaroslava Varella Valentova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Pseudoscientific Beliefs, Trust, Political Party Affiliation, and Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Kim L Gratz; Julia R Richmond; Sherry E Woods; Katherine L Dixon-Gordon; Kayla M Scamaldo; Jason P Rose; Matthew T Tull
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours.

Authors:  Jack P Hughes; Alexandros Efstratiou; Sara R Komer; Lilli A Baxter; Milica Vasiljevic; Ana C Leite
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Grigorios Karakatsoulis; Seri Abraham; Kristina Adorjan; Helal Uddin Ahmed; Renato D Alarcón; Kiyomi Arai; Sani Salihu Auwal; Michael Berk; Sarah Bjedov; Julio Bobes; Teresa Bobes-Bascaran; Julie Bourgin-Duchesnay; Cristina Ana Bredicean; Laurynas Bukelskis; Akaki Burkadze; Indira Indiana Cabrera Abud; Ruby Castilla-Puentes; Marcelo Cetkovich; Hector Colon-Rivera; Ricardo Corral; Carla Cortez-Vergara; Piirika Crepin; Domenico De Berardis; Sergio Zamora Delgado; David De Lucena; Avinash De Sousa; Ramona Di Stefano; Seetal Dodd; Livia Priyanka Elek; Anna Elissa; Berta Erdelyi-Hamza; Gamze Erzin; Martin J Etchevers; Peter Falkai; Adriana Farcas; Ilya Fedotov; Viktoriia Filatova; Nikolaos K Fountoulakis; Iryna Frankova; Francesco Franza; Pedro Frias; Tatiana Galako; Cristian J Garay; Leticia Garcia-Álvarez; Maria Paz García-Portilla; Xenia Gonda; Tomasz M Gondek; Daniela Morera González; Hilary Gould; Paolo Grandinetti; Arturo Grau; Violeta Groudeva; Michal Hagin; Takayuki Harada; M Tasdik Hasan; Nurul Azreen Hashim; Jan Hilbig; Sahadat Hossain; Rossitza Iakimova; Mona Ibrahim; Felicia Iftene; Yulia Ignatenko; Matias Irarrazaval; Zaliha Ismail; Jamila Ismayilova; Asaf Jacobs; Miro Jakovljević; Nenad Jakšić; Afzal Javed; Helin Yilmaz Kafali; Sagar Karia; Olga Kazakova; Doaa Khalifa; Olena Khaustova; Steve Koh; Svetlana Kopishinskaia; Korneliia Kosenko; Sotirios A Koupidis; Illes Kovacs; Barbara Kulig; Alisha Lalljee; Justine Liewig; Abdul Majid; Evgeniia Malashonkova; Khamelia Malik; Najma Iqbal Malik; Gulay Mammadzada; Bilvesh Mandalia; Donatella Marazziti; Darko Marčinko; Stephanie Martinez; Eimantas Matiekus; Gabriela Mejia; Roha Saeed Memon; Xarah Elenne Meza Martínez; Dalia Mickevičiūtė; Roumen Milev; Muftau Mohammed; Alejandro Molina-López; Petr Morozov; Nuru Suleiman Muhammad; Filip Mustač; Mika S Naor; Amira Nassieb; Alvydas Navickas; Tarek Okasha; Milena Pandova; Anca-Livia Panfil; Liliya Panteleeva; Ion Papava; Mikaella E Patsali; Alexey Pavlichenko; Bojana Pejuskovic; Mariana Pinto Da Costa; Mikhail Popkov; Dina Popovic; Nor Jannah Nasution Raduan; Francisca Vargas Ramírez; Elmars Rancans; Salmi Razali; Federico Rebok; Anna Rewekant; Elena Ninoska Reyes Flores; María Teresa Rivera-Encinas; Pilar Saiz; Manuel Sánchez de Carmona; David Saucedo Martínez; Jo Anne Saw; Görkem Saygili; Patricia Schneidereit; Bhumika Shah; Tomohiro Shirasaka; Ketevan Silagadze; Satti Sitanggang; Oleg Skugarevsky; Anna Spikina; Sridevi Sira Mahalingappa; Maria Stoyanova; Anna Szczegielniak; Simona Claudia Tamasan; Giuseppe Tavormina; Maurilio Giuseppe Maria Tavormina; Pavlos N Theodorakis; Mauricio Tohen; Eva Maria Tsapakis; Dina Tukhvatullina; Irfan Ullah; Ratnaraj Vaidya; Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier; Jelena Vrublevska; Olivera Vukovic; Olga Vysotska; Natalia Widiasih; Anna Yashikhina; Panagiotis E Prezerakos; Daria Smirnova
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.600

6.  Tracking discussions of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a month-by-month sentiment analysis of Twitter data.

Authors:  Jeremy Y Ng; Wael Abdelkader; Cynthia Lokker
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-04-13

7.  Network analysis of the relationships between conspiracy beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccine and symptoms of fear of COVID-19 in a sample of latin american countries.

Authors:  Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez; José Ventura-León; Pablo D Valencia; Lindsey W Vilca; Carlos Carbajal-León; Mario Reyes-Bossio; Mariel Delgado-Campusano; Claudio Rojas-Jara; Roberto Polanco-Carrasco; Miguel Gallegos; Mauricio Cervigni; Pablo Martino; Diego Alejandro Palacios; Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera; Antonio Samaniego-Pinho; Marlon Elías Lobos Rivera; Andrés Buschiazzo Figares; Diana Ximena Puerta-Cortés; Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes; Raymundo Calderón; Bismarck Pinto Tapia; Walter L Arias Gallegos; Olimpia Petzold
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-09-07

8.  The Impact of Science-Unbased Measures Against COVID-19 in Clinical Decision-Making Process.

Authors:  João Vitor Cândido Pimentel; Thaíse Duarte Onofre Sabiá E Silva; Ana Beatriz Tavares Filgueiras; Modesto Leite Rolim Neto
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Experiences of nurses amidst giving care to COVID-19 patients in clinical settings in Iraqi Kurdistan: A qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Deldar Morad Abdulah; Hawar Abdulrazaq Mohammedsadiq; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 4.423

10.  Impact of COVID-19 Related Knowledge and Precautions on Emotional and Behavioral Problems Among Children During the Post-pandemic in China: The Explanatory Value of Emotional Problems Among Caregivers.

Authors:  Jingyi Wang; Yun Chen; Xiaoqin Guo; Haijiang Lin; Marcus Richards; Hao Wang; Xiaoxiao Chen; Chaowei Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.