| Literature DB >> 32601576 |
Abdulraheem A Almokhtar1, Ahmed S Qanat1, Albarra Mulla1, Ziyad Alqurashi1, Ahmed Aljeraisi1, Adel H Hegaze1.
Abstract
Objectives We investigated the relationship between acromial shape, classified as Type I-IV by magnetic resonance imaging, and the occurrence and characteristics of rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Methods This retrospective cohort study included 89 patients aged 25 - 60 years who underwent RCT surgeries in the Orthopedic Department at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) from January 2014 to April 2019. We collected imaging findings from the KAUH record system, which were then entered into a Google form (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA) and exported to Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA). Correlations between variables were assessed using Chi-squared tests. Results The supraspinatus muscle in both men and women was most commonly affected by RCTs, accounting for 73.6% of all tears. Subscapularis was the next most commonly injured muscle of the rotator cuff (15.1%), followed by the infraspinatus muscle (11.3%). The majority of supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tears (69.2%, 66.7%, and 56.3%, respectively) were associated with flat acromia. In all cases, tears in association with flat acromia were more prevalent among women (supraspinatus: 51.3% in women, 17.9% in men, p = 0.030; infraspinatus: 50% in women, 16.7% in men, p = 0.292; subscapularis: 43.8% in women, 12.5% in men, p = 0.054). Conclusions No correlation exists between acromial shape and sex, regardless of the specific muscle injured. However, supraspinatus injury, acromial shape, and sex are significantly related; right-side partial tear injuries occur more frequently among women aged ≥ 50 years with flat acromia than other RCTs.Entities:
Keywords: acromial anatomy; rotator cuff tears
Year: 2020 PMID: 32601576 PMCID: PMC7317141 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Types of acromial shapes
Figure 2The relation between acromial shape and type of RCT in regard to the sex and side
Figure 3Types of acromial shapes associated with muscle injuries
A: Type I acromion (flat): green arrow; supraspinatus complete tear: blue arrow
B: Type II acromion (curved): green arrow, partial supraspinatus tear: blue arrow
C: Type IV acromion (convex): green arrow, partial supraspinatus tear: blue arrow
D: Type III acromion (hooked): green arrow, supraspinatus complete tear: blue arrow
Frequency of Rotator Cuff Injury
RTCs: rotator cuff tears
| Frequency | Percent | Nature of injury alone vs. in combination with other RCTs (%/%) | ||
| Muscles | Infraspinatus muscle | 12 | 11.3 | 25 vs. 75 |
| Subscapularis muscle | 16 | 15.1 | 43.75 vs. 56.25 | |
| Supraspinatus muscle | 78 | 73.6 | 80.77 vs. 19.23 | |
| Total | 106 | 100.0 | ||
Distribution of Rotator Cuff Muscle Injuries in Relation to Acromial Shape and Sex
| Sex | Total | |||||
| Male | Female | |||||
| Supraspinatus muscle | Acromial shape | Convex | Count | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of total | 3.8% | 0.0% | 3.8% | |||
| Curved | Count | 8 | 10 | 18 | ||
| % of total | 10.3% | 12.8% | 23.1% | |||
| Flat | Count | 14 | 40 | 54 | ||
| % of total | 17.9% | 51.3% | 69.2% | |||
| Hooked | Count | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| % of total | 1.3% | 2.6% | 3.8% | |||
| Total | Count | 26 | 52 | 78 | ||
| % of total | 33.3% | 66.7% | 100.0% | |||
| P-value | .030 | |||||
| Infraspinatus muscle | Acromial shape | Convex | Count | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| % of total | 0.0% | 8.3% | 8.3% | |||
| Curved | Count | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| % of total | 16.7% | 8.3% | 25.0% | |||
| Flat | Count | 2 | 6 | 8 | ||
| % of total | 16.7% | 50.0% | 66.7% | |||
| Total | Count | 4 | 8 | 12 | ||
| % of total | 33.3% | 66.7% | 100.0% | |||
| P-value | .292 | |||||
| Subscapularis muscle | Acromial shape | Convex | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of total | 6.3% | 0.0% | 6.3% | |||
| Curved | Count | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||
| % of total | 25.0% | 6.3% | 31.3% | |||
| Flat | Count | 2 | 7 | 9 | ||
| % of total | 12.5% | 43.8% | 56.3% | |||
| Hooked | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| % of total | 6.3% | 0.0% | 6.3% | |||
| Total | Count | 8 | 8 | 16 | ||
| % of total | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | |||
| P-value | .054 | |||||
Frequency of Rotator Cuff Tears (RCTs) Related to the Type of Injury
| Name of muscle injury * Type of rotator cuff injury Cross tabulation | |||||
| Type of rotator cuff injury | Total | ||||
| Complete tear | Partial tear | ||||
| Name of muscle injury | Infraspinatus muscle | Count | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| % within name of muscle injury | 25.0% | 75.0% | 100.0% | ||
| % within type of rotator cuff injury | 13.6% | 10.7% | 11.3% | ||
| % of total | 2.8% | 8.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Subscapularis muscle | Count | 3 | 13 | 16 | |
| % within name of muscle injury | 18.8% | 81.3% | 100.0% | ||
| % within type of rotator cuff injury | 13.6% | 15.5% | 15.1% | ||
| % of total | 2.8% | 12.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Supraspinatus muscle | Count | 16 | 62 | 78 | |
| % within name of muscle injury | 20.5% | 79.5% | 100.0% | ||
| % within type of rotator cuff injury | 72.7% | 73.8% | 73.6% | ||
| % of total | 15.1% | 58.5% | 73.6% | ||
| Total | Count | 22 | 84 | 106 | |
| % within name of muscle injury | 20.8% | 79.2% | 100.0% | ||
| % within type of rotator cuff injury | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
| % of total | 20.8% | 79.2% | 100.0% | ||
Distribution of Rotator Cuff Muscle Injuries in Relation to Acromial Shape and Types of Tears
| Supraspinatus muscle | Acromial shape | Total | ||||||
| Convex | Curved | Flat | Hooked | |||||
| Rotator cuff injury | Partial tear | Count | 3 | 14 | 43 | 2 | 62 | |
| % within rotator cuff injury | 4.8% | 22.6% | 69.4% | 3.2% | 100% | |||
| Complete tear | Count | 0 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 16 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 0.0% | 25.0% | 68.8% | 6.3% | 100% | |||
| Total | Count | 3 | 18 | 54 | 3 | 78 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 3.8% | 23.1% | 69.2% | 3.8% | 100% | |||
| P-value | .642 | |||||||
| Infraspinatus muscle | ||||||||
| Rotator cuff injury | Partial tear | Count | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 9 | |
| % within rotator cuff injury | 11.1% | 22.2% | 66.7% | 0 | 100.0% | |||
| Complete tear | Count | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 0.0% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 0 | 100.0% | |||
| Total | Count | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 12 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 8.3% | 25.0% | 66.7% | 0 | 100.0% | |||
| % of total | 8.3% | 25.0% | 66.7% | 0 | 100.0% | |||
| P-value | .712 | |||||||
| Subscapularis muscle | ||||||||
| Rotator cuff injury | Partial tear | Count | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 13 | |
| % within rotator cuff injury | 7.7% | 23.1% | 61.5% | 7.7% | 100.0% | |||
| Complete tear | Count | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 0.0% | 66.7% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Total | Count | 1 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 16 | ||
| % within rotator cuff injury | 6.3% | 31.3% | 56.3% | 6.3% | 100.0% | |||
| % of total | 6.3% | 31.3% | 56.3% | 6.3% | 100.0% | |||
| P-value | .487 | |||||||