| Literature DB >> 32601162 |
Letícia Tiburcio Ferreira1, Juliana Rodrigues2, Carolina Horta Andrade3,2, Pedro Vitor Lemos Cravo4,5, Fabio Trindade Maranhão Costa3, Gustavo Capatti Cassiano1,6, Tatyana Almeida Tavella1, Kaira Cristina Peralis Tomaz1, Djane Clarys Baia-da-Silva7, Macejane Ferreira Souza7,8, Marilia Nunes do Nascimento Lima2, Melina Mottin2, Ludimila Dias Almeida9, Juliana Calit10, Maria Carolina Silva de Barros Puça7, Gisely Cardoso Melo8, Daniel Youssef Bargieri10, Stefanie Costa Pinto Lopes7,8, Marcus Vinicius Guimarães Lacerda8, Elizabeth Bilsland9, Per Sunnerhagen11, Bruno Junior Neves2,5.
Abstract
Widespread resistance against antimalarial drugs thwarts current efforts for controlling the disease and urges the discovery of new effective treatments. Drug repositioning is increasingly becoming an attractive strategy since it can reduce costs, risks, and time-to-market. Herein, we have used this strategy to identify novel antimalarial hits. We used a comparative in silico chemogenomics approach to select Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax proteins as potential drug targets and analyzed them using a computer-assisted drug repositioning pipeline to identify approved drugs with potential antimalarial activity. Among the seven drugs identified as promising antimalarial candidates, the anthracycline epirubicin was selected for further experimental validation. Epirubicin was shown to be potent in vitro against sensitive and multidrug-resistant P. falciparum strains and P. vivax field isolates in the nanomolar range, as well as being effective against an in vivo murine model of Plasmodium yoelii Transmission-blocking activity was observed for epirubicin in vitro and in vivo Finally, using yeast-based haploinsufficiency chemical genomic profiling, we aimed to get insights into the mechanism of action of epirubicin. Beyond the target predicted in silico (a DNA gyrase in the apicoplast), functional assays suggested a GlcNac-1-P-transferase (GPT) enzyme as a potential target. Docking calculations predicted the binding mode of epirubicin with DNA gyrase and GPT proteins. Epirubicin is originally an antitumoral agent and presents associated toxicity. However, its antiplasmodial activity against not only P. falciparum but also P. vivax in different stages of the parasite life cycle supports the use of this drug as a scaffold for hit-to-lead optimization in malaria drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: DNA gyrase; chemogenomics; drug repositioning; epirubicin; malaria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32601162 PMCID: PMC7449180 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02041-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1In silico chemogenomics strategy for drug repurposing. (A) Flowchart summarizing the in silico repositioning chemogenomics strategy and corresponding results. (B) Phenotypic screening for inhibition of P. falciparum 3D7 growth in vitro using compound candidates for repositioning at 5 μM. (C) Chemical structure of epirubicin. CQ, chloroquine; PYR, pyrimethamine; EPI, epirubicin; PH, phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride; BH, besifloxacin hydrochloride; NS, nedocromil sodium; IH, isoproterenol hydrochloride; ME, mesalazine; CAP, captopril.
In vitro antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of epirubicin
| Drug | EC50 (nM) of | COS-7 | HepG2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D7 | Dd2 | W2 | CC50 (nM) | SI | CC50 (nM) | SI | |
| Epirubicin | 110.7 ± 22.4 | 99.5 ± 25.1 | 68.9 ± 5.1 | 5,480 ± 720 | 49.4 | 80 ± 30 | 0.7 |
| Chloroquine | 11.3 ± 3.6 | 137.8 ± 34.1 | 182.8 ± 11.5 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
EC50, half of the maximal inhibitory concentration in P. falciparum; CC50, half of the maximal cytotoxic concentration in mammalian cells; SI, selectivity index calculated from CC50/EC50 (3D7); ND, not determined. Data are means ± SD and are derived from three independent experiments.
FIG 2In vitro antimalarial activity of epirubicin against P. falciparum strains. Inhibition curves for epirubicin in vitro against chloroquine-sensitive (3D7) (A) and multidrug-resistant (Dd2 and W2) (B, C) P. falciparum strains. Data are derived from three independent experiments. (D) Microscopy of Giemsa-stained thin smears of highly synchronized parasite cultures starting at the ring stage (1% parasitemia). First line shows parasites treated with DMSO (control), while second line shows culture continuously treated with epirubicin at concentrations 2-fold the EC50 value. Images were collected using an Olympus microscope equipped with 100× lens objective and a camera.
In vivo parasitemia inhibition of P. yoelii 17XNL-infected mice treated with epirubicin for 4 days
| Group | Mean percentage parasitemia ± SD (% inhibition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | |
| Nontreated | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 1.5 |
| Treated with epirubicin (mg/kg) | |||
| 2 | 0.6 ± 0.4 (56) | 2.2 ± 1.5 (0) | 6.9 ± 5.3 (0) |
| 4 | 0.2 ± 0.2 (82) | 1.4 ± 1.2 (19) | 7.5 ± 6.1 (0) |
| 6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 (95) | 0.4 ± 0.3 (78) | 1.8 ± 1.3 (51) |
Values are expressed as mean percentage parasitemia inhibition relative to nontreated control. Data are means ± SD and are derived from three independent experiments (control, n = 18; 2 mg/kg, n = 16; 4 mg/kg, n = 15; 6 mg/kg, n = 16).
FIG 3Blood stage and transmission-blocking activity of epirubicin on P. vivax. (A) Ex vivo drug susceptibility of epirubicin in clinical isolates of P. vivax from Manaus, Brazil. (B) In vitro inhibition of P. berghei gamete fertilization and ookinete conversion by epirubicin on conversion assay. Infection rates (C) and oocyst intensity (D) in membrane feeding assay (MFA) using An. aquasalis mosquitoes exposed to P. vivax-infected blood. For membrane feeding assays, seven biological replicates were performed.
FIG 4Investigation of the mechanism of action of epirubicin. (A) Chemical genomic profiling assay. A pool of ∼6,000 barcoded heterozygous strains deleted for each gene of the S. cerevisiae genome is cultivated in the presence and absence of a sublethal dose of epirubicin. Yeast culture is diluted 1:20 at 5 generations, and growth is allowed until 10 generations. Genomic DNA is collected for sequencing. Barcode counting allows identification of strains depleted under treatment, suggesting hypersensitivity to epirubicin. (B) Drug-induced haploinsufficiency profiling of mutant haploid heterozygous S. cerevisiae upon treatment with epirubicin EC20. Log fold change is plotted on the y axis as a function of depleted yeast strains alphabetically ordered by their respective open reading frame (ORF). The lower the log fold change value, the more sensitive the strain is. Red dots highlighted in the chart represent the ORFs that meet the conditions P value of <0.001 and log2 fold change of <0. (C) Scheme summarizing the proposed mechanism for the mode of action of epirubicin in the malaria parasite. Abbreviations: gDNA, genomic DNA; IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; dol-P, dolichol phosphate; GPT, dolichol phosphate N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase; dol-PP-GlcNAc, dolichol pyrophosphate N-acetylglucosamine.
FIG 53D intermolecular interactions obtained by molecular docking between epirubicin and its two potential targets. (A) Epirubicin (carbon atoms in cyan) docked within DNA binding site of P. falciparum gyrase-DNA (docking score, −7.96 kcal·mol−1), highlighting the main hydrogen bonds (dotted black lines) within epirubicin and the amino acid residues Lys248, Glu278, and Asn280, as well as the interaction with the DNA base pair thymine (T1). Epirubicin also made hydrophobic interactions with the Val255 residue (transparent green surface). (B) Docked pose of epirubicin with P. falciparum GPT protein (docking score, −7.92 kcal·mol−1), highlighting the main hydrogen bonds (dotted black lines) with the amino acid residues Glu96, Asp145, Asn212, and Arg338. Epirubicin was also able to make a T-stacking interaction with the Trp151 residue (transparent purple surface). Amino acids are colored as carbon atoms in green, oxygen in red, hydrogen in white, and nitrogen in blue.