Literature DB >> 32600945

Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

Denis A Vaughan1, Jaimin S Shah2, Alan S Penzias2, Alice D Domar3, Thomas L Toth2.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients?
DESIGN: An anonymous cross-sectional online survey was sent to patients who attended a large university-affiliated infertility practice in the USA between 1 January 2019 and 1 April 2020. At three different time-points respondents were asked to note their top three stressors, from a list of 10 commonly reported life stressors.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 10,481 patients, with 3604 responses (response rate 34%) received. A total of 2202 non-pregnant female respondents were included in the final analysis. One-third of respondents had a prior diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, and 11% reported taking anxiolytic medications; over one-quarter had a prior diagnosis of a depressive disorder and 11% reported taking antidepressant medications. At all three time-points, infertility was noted to be the most frequent top stressor. Coronavirus was noted to be the third most common stressor among the respondents in early March but, at the time of writing, is similar to that of infertility (63% and 66%, respectively). A total of 6% of patients stated that infertility treatment, including IVF, should not be offered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CONCLUSION: Despite the unprecedented global pandemic of COVID-19, causing economic and societal uncertainty, the stress of infertility remains significant and is comparable a stressor to the pandemic itself.
Copyright © 2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600945      PMCID: PMC7274108          DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


Introduction

Infertility treatment in the USA and Europe stopped abruptly in mid-March 2020 owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, upon the recommendations of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ARSM, 2020; ESHRE, 2020). Infertile women experience high levels of distress: in a recent study of women undergoing infertility treatment, 56% scored in the clinical range for depression and 76% for anxiety (Pasch et al., 2016). Approximately 13% of infertile women report taking antidepressant medications (Pedro et al., 2019). We sought to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients.

Materials and methods

An anonymous 26-item online questionnaire was sent to patients who attended a large university-affiliated infertility practice in New England, USA, between 1 January 2019 and 1 April 2020. The study was determined to be of exempt status by the Institutional Review Board at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center on 7 April 2020 (IRB protocol number: 2020P000322). The questionnaire was sent to 10,481 patients on 9 April 2020: 3604 responses (response rate 34%) were received from 9 April to 16 April. Respondents were asked to note their top three stressors, from a list of 10 commonly reported life stressors: their job, family, infertility, money, health, friends, partner, the coronavirus, insurance status and ‘other’, in which case the respondents could specify another stressor. In our final analysis we excluded patients who reported being pregnant/post-partum and therefore not currently pursuing infertility treatment, as well as a small number of male respondents.

Results

We included 2202 non-pregnant female respondents in the final analysis. Table 1 outlines respondents’ characteristics. The majority of respondents were white, married or in a domestic partnership, had completed college and were employed. Almost one-third of respondents worked in healthcare. Two-thirds of respondents were awaiting infertility treatment. One-third of respondents had a prior diagnosis of an anxiety disorder and 11% reported taking anxiolytic medications; over one-quarter had a prior diagnosis of a depressive disorder and 11% reported taking antidepressant medications. The mean anxiety and depression scores reported were 3.8 and 3.1, respectively (7-point Likert scale).
Table 1

Respondent characteristics

CharacteristicValuea (n = 2202)
Mean age in years (SD)35.4 (4.6)
Race
 White1758 (79.8)
 Black69 (3.1)
 Hispanic141 (6.4)
 Asian180 (8.2)
 Other54 (2.5)
Married/in a domestic partnership2019 (91.7)
Hold a college or graduate degree1811 (82.2)
Currently employed full time1712 (77.7)
Work in healthcare647 (29.4)
Already have children612 (27.8)
Prior fertility treatment1086 (49.3)
Patients waiting for tests/results569 (25.8)
Patients waiting for treatment1472 (66.8)
Prefer not to say161 (7.3)
Prior diagnosis of anxiety746 (33.9)
currently medicating245 (11.1)
Prior diagnosis of depression578 (26.2)
 currently medicating247 (11.2)
Top 3 stressors in January
 Infertility1786 (81.1)
 Your job1438 (65.3)
 Money952 (43.2)
Top 3 stressors in early March
 Infertility1527 (69.3)
 Your job1194 (54.2)
 Coronavirus1180 (53.6)
Top 3 stressors currently
 Infertility1461 (66.4)
 Coronavirus1384 (62.9)
 Your job1108 (50.3)
Mean (SD) current anxiety (1–7 scale)3.8 (1.5)
Mean (SD) current depression (1–7 scale)3.1 (1.7)
Should infertility treatment be offered during pandemic?
 Yes684 (31.2)
 Unsure/depends on patient's circumstances1377 (62.8)
 No131 (6.0)

Values are given as n (%) unless otherwise stated.

Respondent characteristics Values are given as n (%) unless otherwise stated. Respondents were asked to note their top three stressors: in January 2020 (before the COVID-19 pandemic), in early March (at the beginning) and currently (in the midst of the pandemic). For example, a total of 81% of respondents cited infertility as one of their top three stressors in January, and 65% and 43% reported their job and money as one of their top three stressors at that time-point (Table 1). At all three time-points, infertility was noted to be the most frequently reported top stressor. Coronavirus was noted to be the third most common stressor among the respondents in early March but is currently similar to that of infertility (63% and 66%, respectively). Only 6% of patients stated that infertility treatment, including IVF, should not be offered during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discussion

Infertility is a significant public health issue in the USA, with 7.3 million (12%) women aged 15–44 years reporting the use of infertility services (Chandra et al., 2014). Even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, a minority of respondents stated that infertility treatments should not be offered at this time. While mathematical models predicting the epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic are not without pitfalls, it is likely that the pandemic will be disruptive to the health system for some time (Jewell et al., 2020). This delay in treatment will only compound the stress of the infertile population. Limitations of this study include its response rate. Despite a large number of respondents, it is possible that this is not a representative sample, which we are unable to verify owing to the anonymous nature of the survey. In addition, the survey was distributed in the New England area of the USA and the responses may not be generalizable. Despite the unprecedented global pandemic of COVID-19, causing economic and societal uncertainty, the stress of infertility remains significant and is a comparable stressor to the pandemic itself.
  21 in total

1.  Characterization of Epigenetic and Molecular Factors in Endometrium of Females with Infertility.

Authors:  Giedrė Skliutė; Raminta Baušytė; Diana Ramašauskaitė; Rūta Navakauskienė
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-04

2.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Fertility Care.

Authors:  Karen N DSouza; Minerva Orellana; Alessandra J Ainsworth; Gabrielle Cummings; Kirsten A Riggan; Chandra C Shenoy; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Fear of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) among pregnant and infertile women in Japan.

Authors:  Keigo Asai; Koubun Wakashima; Sayaka Toda; Kohei Koiwa
Journal:  J Affect Disord Rep       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women's health providers.

Authors:  Ashley Wiltshire; Tia Jackson-Bey; Zachary Walker; Jasmine L Chiang; Paul A MacLennan; Deidre Gunn; William W Hurd
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Anxiety, Difficulties, and Coping of Infertile Women.

Authors:  Diana Antonia Iordăchescu; Corina Ioana Paica; Alina Estera Boca; Corina Gică; Anca Maria Panaitescu; Gheorghe Peltecu; Alina Veduță; Nicolae Gică
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  The impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on fertility patients and clinics around the world.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cutting; Sally Catt; Beverley Vollenhoven; Ben W Mol; Fabrizzio Horta
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.567

7.  The psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on women who become pregnant after receiving treatment for infertility: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alice D Domar; Jaimin S Shah; Annika Gompers; Alison J Meyers; Darya R Khodakhah; Michele R Hacker; Alan S Penzias; Denny Sakkas; Thomas L Toth; Denis A Vaughan
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Universal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction screening and assisted reproductive technology in a coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic epicenter: screening and cycle outcomes from a New York City fertility center.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Shaw; Jessica Tozour; Jennifer K Blakemore; James Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.490

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of the impact of COVID-19 on human reproductive biology, assisted reproduction care and pregnancy: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Mitko Madjunkov; Michal Dviri; Clifford Librach
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Resuming Assisted Reproduction Services during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Initial Indian Experience.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge; Sadhana Patwardhan; Shishir Narendra Jirge; Deepali A Bhomkar; Shruti M Chougule; Anita Salpekar; Deepak Modi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.