Literature DB >> 32600814

In Vivo Corrosion of Modular Dual-Mobility Implants: A Retrieval Study.

Joshua M Kolz1, Cody C Wyles1, Douglas W Van Citters2, Ryan M Chapman2, Robert T Trousdale1, Daniel J Berry1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modular dual-mobility (MDM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants have an additional metal-metal interface between the metal liner and outer metal shell that poses a risk of corrosion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate retrieved MDM liners to evaluate qualitative and quantitative damage and corrosion patterns at this interface.
METHODS: Twelve MDM implants of one design with a mean in situ duration of 26 months (range, 1-57 months) were evaluated. Six implants (50%) were from primary THAs and 6 (50%) from revision THAs. The taper region of the liner at risk of damage was qualitatively graded using modified Goldberg criteria while quantitative dimensional assessment was performed with a validated coordinate measurement machine.
RESULTS: Among the retrieved implants, 2 (17%) demonstrated severe grade 4 corrosion, 5 (42%) moderate grade 3 corrosion, 4 (33%) mild grade 2 corrosion, and 1 (8%) grade 1 (no visible corrosion). Mean maximum linear corrosion depth at the taper interface measured 35.5 microns (range, 8.4-176.2 microns). All implants had a maximum linear corrosion depth >7 microns, a threshold suggestive of potentially clinically significant material loss. Three corrosion patterns were identified: generalized corrosion, a stripe of corrosion about the middle of the taper region, and focal areas of corrosion at the portion of the taper closest to the joint surface.
CONCLUSION: Visual and dimensional analysis of all 12 retrieved MDM implants demonstrated identifiable corrosion/wear of the cobalt-chromium metal liner taper of varying severity. These implants should be used judiciously until larger series with clinical correlation can be completed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corrosion; dual mobility; retrieval; total hip arthroplasty; wear

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600814     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Creation of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient-Specific Dislocation Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Hilal Maradit-Kremers; Dirk R Larson; David G Lewallen; Michael J Taunton; Robert T Trousdale; Mark W Pagnano; Daniel J Berry; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Dual-mobility versus Fixed-bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Outcome Comparison.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Jeremy Loloi; William Macaulay; Matthew S Hepinstall; Ran Schwarzkopf; Vinay K Aggarwal
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Serum Metal Ions in Contemporary Monoblock and Modular Dual Mobility Articulations.

Authors:  Alexander Greenberg; Allina Nocon; Ivan De Martino; David J Mayman; Thomas P Sculco; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-29

4.  Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; Lorenzo Banci; Riccardo Valtorta; Luca Amendola
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  No Change in Serum Metal Ions Levels After Primary Total Hip Replacement With an Additively Manufactured Dual Mobility Acetabular Construct.

Authors:  Kyle Alpaugh; Mithun Mishu; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 6.  Adverse reaction to metal debris due to fretting corrosion between the acetabular components of modular dual-mobility constructs in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan M R French; Paul Bramley; Sean Scattergood; Nemandra A Sandiford
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-05-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.