| Literature DB >> 32600440 |
Yang Li1, Cai Minzhang1, Ma Minghui2, Huang Xinmiao2, Liu Laixin3, Wang Bei4, Zhu Weihai2, Zhe Wei3, Guan Yumei5, Thitima Kongnakorn6, Ying Xiao6, Siyang Peng6, David Hughes7, Naranjargal Dashdorj8, Thomas Hach9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A recent community-based disease management (CBDM) pilot study reported a 20.5% prevalence of hypertension and a 0.5 and 3.6% prevalence of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD), respectively, in an elderly population (mean age 65 years) in the Xin Jiang autonomous region of China. The CBDM was initiated in 2013 as an essential public health service; however, the potential long-term impact of CBDM on cardiovascular (CV: CHD and stroke) events is unknown. The objective of the study was to understand the long-term impact of CBDM interventions on CV risk factors using disease-model simulation based on a single-arm experimental study.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease (CVD); Community-based disease management (CBDM); Congestive heart failure (CHD); Discrete-event simulation (DES) model; Hypertension; Myocardial infarction (MI); Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32600440 PMCID: PMC7325287 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09157-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Variables of CHD risk equation used in model base case
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Coefficient | |
| 0.07 | 0.07 | |
| −0.51 | −0.5 | |
| Reference | Reference | |
| 0.21 | −0.87 | |
| 0.33 | 0.34 | |
| 0.77 | 0.47 | |
| −0.51 | 0.18 | |
| Reference | Reference | |
| 0.07 | 0.13 | |
| 0.32 | 0.14 | |
| 0.52 | 1.67 | |
| −0.25 | 0.62 | |
| 0.01 | 0.3 | |
| Reference | 0.08 | |
| −0.07 | Reference | |
| −0.4 | −0.78 | |
| 0.09 | 0.18 | |
| 0.62 | − 0.95 | |
| 0.9895 | 0.9961 |
CHD coronary heart disease, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure
SBP optimal: ≤120 mmHg; SBP normal 120–130 mmHg; SBP high normal 130–140 mmHg; SBP stage 1 hypertension 140–160 mmHg; SBP stage 2–4 hypertension ≥160 mmHg
Variables of stroke risk equation used in model base case
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Coefficient | |
| 0.07 | 0.09 | |
| −0.55 | −0.83 | |
| Reference | Reference | |
| 0.40 | 0.23 | |
| 0.81 | 0.80 | |
| 1.70 | 1.37 | |
| 2.53 | 1.85 | |
| Reference | Reference | |
| 0.29 | 0.68 | |
| Reference | Reference | |
| −0.01 | −0.09 | |
| 0.30 | 0.27 | |
| 0.71 | 0.47 | |
| 0.07 | 0.96 | |
| 0.9835 | 0.9948 | |
| 0.9895 | 0.9961 |
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure
Case fatality rate for CHD and stroke, by gender and age group
| CHD | Stroke | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 30 | 50 | 6 | 10 | |
| 38 | 42 | 11 | 10 | |
| 41 | 43 | 17 | 15 | |
| 45 | 51 | 27 | 25 | |
| 53 | 57 | 31 | 28 | |
CHD coronary heart disease
Baseline population characteristics
| Full population ( | Male ( | Female ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65.4 (11.1) | 65.4 (11.4) | 65.4 (10.8) | |
| 144.3 (20.0) | 143.9 (20.1) | 144.6 (20.0) | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| 13 | 13 | 13 | |
| 19 | 20 | 19 | |
| 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| 17 | 18 | 16 | |
| 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| 212.3 (22.0) | 213.3 (21.5) | 211.5 (22.3) | |
| 67.4 (6.2) | 69.6 (11.1) | 65.8 (5.3) | |
| 117.9 (16.5) | 117.8 (16.2) | 118.1 (16.6) | |
| 57 | 0 | 100 | |
| 16 | 14 | 19 | |
| 11 | 22 | 1 |
HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation
SBP reduction in subgroups
| Subgroups | Sample size | SBP reduction (mmHg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | ||
| 1199 | −7.9436 | 25.3237 | |
| 1601 | −9.2856 | 25.2491 | |
| 890 | −8.9761 | 26.3045 | |
| 1910 | −8.4864 | 24.5032 | |
| 1014 | 8.9768 | 15.7911 | |
| 1786 | −18.2826 | 16.7164 | |
SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation
Event rate per 100,000 people in overall population
| Intervention | CHD | Stroke | CHD-related death | Stroke-related death |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 276.0 | 1788.9 | 139.4 | 476.2 | |
| 253.8 | 1291.0 | 131.6 | 342.8 | |
| 242.1 | 1255.0 | 125.7 | 332.7 | |
| 218.1 | 960.0 | 112.7 | 259.3 |
CHD coronary heart disease, SBP systolic blood pressure
Fig. 1Relative Risk of CHD Event. SBP/smoking/lipid indicates that the combined effect of all three interventions was able to reduce all three risk factors. SBP/smoking indicates that the combined effect of both interventions was able to reduce both risk factors. CHD coronary heart disease, SBP systolic blood pressure
Fig. 2Relative Risk of Stroke Event. SBP/smoking/lipid indicates that the combined effect of all three interventions was able to reduce all three risk factors.SBP/smoking indicates that the combined effect of both interventions was able to reduce both risk factors. CHD coronary heart disease, SBP systolic blood pressure
Fig. 3Impact of SBP reduction, smoking cessation, and lipid control on mortality due to CHD or stroke. CHD coronary heart disease, SBP systolic blood pressure
Event rate per 100,000 people and relative risk in subgroups
| Subgroup | Intervention | CHD | Stroke | CHD-related death | Stroke-related death | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event rate | Relative risk | Event rate | Relative risk | Event rate | Relative risk | Event rate | Relative risk | ||
| 404.1 | 2568.5 | 210.2 | 720.2 | ||||||
| 370.2 | 0.92 | 1892.0 | 0.74 | 195.7 | 0.94 | 536.3 | 0.75 | ||
| 150.3 | 918.9 | 70.2 | 209.6 | ||||||
| 125.6 | 0.84 | 632.8 | 0.69 | 60.0 | 0.85 | 146.4 | 0.70 | ||
| 149.9 | 1875.9 | 81.0 | 491.7 | ||||||
| 143.9 | 0.96 | 1378.8 | 0.74 | 76.6 | 0.95 | 361.5 | 0.74 | ||
| 455.6 | 1679.3 | 218.2 | 471.9 | ||||||
| 410.0 | 0.91 | 1172.1 | 0.70 | 193.6 | 0.89 | 332.4 | 0.71 | ||
| 340.0 | 2393.8 | 173.0 | 637.6 | ||||||
| 270.2 | 0.80 | 1331.4 | 0.56 | 137.6 | 0.81 | 351.9 | 0.56 | ||
| 174.6 | 800.2 | 85.7 | 216.8 | ||||||
| 223.9 | 1.28 | 910.8 | 1.14 | 110.8 | 1.29 | 245.6 | 1.13 | ||
CHD coronary heart disease, SBP systolic blood pressure
aAcute death determined by 28-day case fatality rates