| Literature DB >> 32600279 |
Zhao Gao1,2, Yunda Zhang2, Xiaohong Gao2, Ximei Zhang2, Tao Ma2, Gaiyun Li2, Jingjing Wang3, Hua Yan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical characteristics and analyze the predictive factors associated with improved visual acuity of 359 patients with infectious endophthalmitis.Entities:
Keywords: Causative organisms; Clinical characteristics; Endophthalmitis; Predictive factors; Visual acuity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32600279 PMCID: PMC7325235 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01517-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Patient characteristics with infectious endophthalmitis in the Shanxi Eye Hospital, China from 2014 to 2018
Causative organisms in the 316 eyes with endophthalmitis
| Causative organisms | n (316) | Rate (%) | Positive rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 141 | 44.62% | 100.00% | |
| Gram-positive | 115 | 36.39% | 81.56% |
| 59 | 18.67% | 41.84% | |
| 11 | 3.48% | 7.80% | |
| 9 | 2.85% | 6.38% | |
| 7 | 2.22% | 4.96% | |
| 7 | 2.22% | 4.96% | |
| 4 | 1.27% | 2.84% | |
| 3 | 0.95% | 2.13% | |
| 3 | 0.95% | 2.13% | |
| 4 | 1.27% | 2.84% | |
| 2 | 0.63% | 1.42% | |
| others | 6 | 1.90% | 4.26% |
| Gram-negative | 16 | 5.06% | 11.35% |
| 4 | 1.27% | 2.84% | |
| 2 | 0.63% | 1.42% | |
| 2 | 0.63% | 1.42% | |
| 2 | 0.63% | 1.42% | |
| 2 | 0.63% | 1.42% | |
| others | 4 | 1.27% | 2.84% |
| Mixed bacteria | 4 | 1.27% | 2.84% |
| fungus | 6 | 1.90% | 4.26% |
| 175 | 55.38% |
The etiological classification of infectious endophthalmitis
| Variables | Posttraumatic | Postsurgical | Corneal ulcer-associated | Endogenous | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 246 (68.52%) | 81 (22.56%) | 24 (6.69%) | 8 (2.22%) | |||
| 2014 | 44 (17.89%) | 16 (19.75%) | 1 (4.17%) | 1 (12.50%) | χ2 = 10.28 | 0.592 |
| 2015 | 58 (23.58%) | 14 (17.28%) | 3 (12.50%) | 1 (12.50%) | ||
| 2016 | 47 (19.11%) | 19 (23.46%) | 6 (25.00%) | 1 (12.50%) | ||
| 2017 | 45 (18.29%) | 16 (19.75%) | 5 (20.83%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| 2018 | 52 (21.14%) | 16 (19.75%) | 9 (37.50%) | 3 (37.50%) | ||
| 41.67 ± 15.51 | 62.21 ± 17.17 | 58.67 ± 11.94 | 67.13 ± 16.13 | F = 43.04 | < 0.0001 | |
| ≦15 | 15 (6.10%) | 2 (2.47%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | χ2 = 134.5 | < 0.0001 |
| 16–30 | 42 (17.07%) | 5 (6.17%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| 31–45 | 84 (34.15%) | 3 (3.70%) | 4 (16.67%) | 1 (12.50%) | ||
| 46–60 | 80 (32.52%) | 17 (20.99%) | 9 (37.50%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| 61–75 | 20 (8.13%) | 33 (40.74%) | 10 (41.67%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| > 75 | 5 (2.03%) | 21 (25.93%) | 1 (4.17%) | 3 (37.50%) | ||
| Male | 219 (89.02%) | 42 (51.85%) | 6 (25.00%) | 4 (50.00%) | χ2 = 84.69 | < 0.0001 |
| Female | 27 (10.98%) | 39 (48.15%) | 18 (75.00%) | 4 (50.00%) | ||
| Farmer | 90 (36.59%) | 31 (38.27%) | 16 (66.67%) | 4 (50.00%) | χ2 = 102.7 | < 0.0001 |
| Worker | 108 (43.90%) | 9 (11.11%) | 1 (4.17%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Student | 20 (8.13%) | 2 (2.47%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| The retired | 1 (0.41%) | 16 (19.75%) | 4 (16.67%) | 1 (12.50%) | ||
| Office clerks | 10 (4.07%) | 4 (4.94%) | 1 (4.17%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Others | 17 (6.91%) | 19 (23.46%) | 2 (8.33%) | 3 (37.50%) | ||
| Right | 131 (53.25%) | 48 (59.26%) | 12 (50.00%) | 1 (12.50%) | χ2 = 6.61 | 0.085 |
| Left | 115 (46.75%) | 33 (40.74%) | 12 (50.00%) | 7 (87.50%) | ||
| ≦7d | 209 (84.96%) | 60 (74.07%) | 6 (25.00%) | 6 (75.00%) | χ2 = 47.41 | < 0.0001 |
| > 7d | 37 (15.04%) | 21 (25.93%) | 18 (75.00%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| MT | 13 (5.28%) | 9 (11.11%) | 3 (12.50%) | 1 (12.50%) | χ2 = 137.3 | < 0.0001 |
| MT + IVA | 36 (14.63%) | 14 (17.28%) | 2 (8.33%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| MT + IVA + PPV | 186 (75.61%) | 53 (65.43%) | 1 (4.17%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| Enucleation | 11 (4.47%) | 5 (6.17%) | 18 (75.00%) | 3 (37.50%) | ||
| 90 (40.72%) | 40 (54.05%) | 7 (58.33) | 4 (50.00%) | |||
| G+ bacteria | 74 (82.22%) | 33 (82.5%) | 4 (57.14%) | 4 (100.00%) | χ2 = 40.42 | 0.0004 |
| G- bacteria | 9 (10.00%) | 7 (17.5%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Mixed bacteria | 4 (4.44%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Fungus | 3 (3.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | 3 (42.86%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| pre-therapy | 2.22 ± 0.63 | 2.30 ± 0.52 | 2.80 ± 0.35 | 2.44 ± 0.70 | F = 7.198 | < 0.0001 |
| ≦2.3 | 195 (79.27%) | 68 (83.95%) | 22 (91.67%) | 7 (87.50%) | χ2 = 3.307 | 0.3467 |
| > 2.3 | 51 (20.73%) | 12 (14.81%) | 2 (8.33%) | 1 (12.50%) | ||
| post- therapy | 1.59 ± 0.80 | 1.53 ± 0.76 | 2.64 ± 0.69 | 2.34 ± 0.87 | F = 15.82 | < 0.0001 |
| ≦2.3 | 78 (31.71%) | 21 (25.93%) | 19 (79.17%) | 6 (75.00%) | χ2 = 30.2 | < 0.0001 |
| > 2.3 | 168 (68.29%) | 59 (72.84%) | 5 (20.83%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| Not improved | 80 (32.52%) | 15 (18.52%) | 19 (79.17%) | 6 (75.00%) | χ2 = 36.96 | < 0.0001 |
| Improved | 166 (67.48%) | 66 (81.48%) | 5 (20.83%) | 2 (25.00%) | ||
| Wound location** | ||||||
| Zone I | 197 (80.08%) | – | – | – | ||
| Zone II | 44 (17.89%) | – | – | – | ||
| Zone III | 5 (2.03%) | – | – | – | ||
| IOFB** | ||||||
| NO | 159 (64.63%) | – | – | – | ||
| Metal | 69 (28.05%) | – | – | – | ||
| Non-metal | 18 (7.32%) | – | – | – | ||
*141 cases of causative organisms positive cultures were included in statistics analysis
**246 cases of posttraumatic endophthalmitis were included in statistics analysis
CO Causative organisms, IOFB intraocular foreign body, PPV pars plana vitrectomy, IVI intravitreal injection, MT medical therapy, IVA intravitreal antibiotic injections, VA visual acuity, G+ gram-positive, G- gram-negative
Therapy modalities
| Therapy modalities | Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 MT | 26 | 7.24% |
| 2 MT + IVA | 54 | 15.04% |
| 3 MT + IVA + PPV | 243 | 67.69% |
| 4 Enucleation | 36 | 10.03% |
| Total | 359 | 100.0% |
MT medical therapy, IVA intravitreal antibiotic injections, PPV pars plana vitrectomy
Fig. 2Comparison of pre- and post-therapy BCVA between difference causative bacteria a and therapy modalities b *Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), P-value between pre-therapy BCVA and post-therapy BCVA P < 0.05. (1:MT, 2. MT + IVA. 3:MT + IVA + PPV. 4: Enucleation)
Patient demographic characteristics of multivariable logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with improved visual acuity in 358 cases
| Factors | Not improved | Improved | t/χ | Multivariable analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (120) | (238) | |||||
| 47.33 ± 17.65 | 48.54 ± 18.41 | t = 0.595 | 0.552 | |||
| 0–15 | 1 (0.83%) | 15 (6.30%) | χ2 = 14.30 | 0.014 | 0.00 (Reference) | |
| 16–30 | 24 (20.00%) | 23 (9.66%) | 0.462 (0.110–1.950) | 0.293 | ||
| 31–45 | 31 (25.83%) | 61 (25.63%) | 0.434 (0.110–1.726) | 0.234 | ||
| 46–60 | 31 (25.83%) | 77 (32.35%) | 0.557 (0.143–2.169) | 0.399 | ||
| 61–75 | 25 (20.83%) | 40 (16.81%) | 0.742 (0.181–3.034) | 0.678 | ||
| > 75 | 8 (6.67%) | 22 (9.24%) | 0.400 (0.088–1.813) | 0.235 | ||
| Male | 102 (85.00%) | 180 (75.63%) | χ2 = 4.188 | 0.041 | 0.00 (Reference) | |
| Female | 18 (15.00%) | 58 (24.37%) | 1.387 (0.719–2.675) | 0.329 | ||
| Farmer | 50 (41.67%) | 91 (38.24%) | χ2 = 3.825 | 0.575 | – | |
| Worker | 40 (33.33%) | 78 (32.77%) | ||||
| Student | 4 (3.33%) | 17 (7.14%) | ||||
| The retired | 5 (4.17%) | 17 (7.14%) | ||||
| Office clerks | 6 (5.00%) | 9 (3.78%) | ||||
| Others | 15 (12.50%) | 26 (10.92%) | ||||
| Right | 58 (48.33%) | 118 (49.58%) | χ2 = 0.0496 | 0.824 | – | |
| Left | 62 (51.67%) | 120 (50.42%) | ||||
| 8.86 ± 13.33 | 5.68 ± 9.10 | t = 2.654 | 0.0083 | |||
| ≦7D | 85 (70.83%) | 194 (81.51%) | χ2 = 5.290 | 0.0214 | 0.00 (Reference) | |
| >7D | 35 (29.17%) | 44 (18.49%) | 0.522 (0.286–0.953) | 0.034 | ||
| PT | 80 (66.67%) | 166 (69.75%) | χ2 = 41.98 | < 0.0001 | 0.00 (Reference) | |
| PS | 15 (12.50%) | 65 (27.31%) | 2.100 (1.109–3.974) | 0.023 | ||
| CA | 19 (15.83%) | 5 (2.10%) | 0.202 (0.066–0.621) | 0.005 | ||
| Ed | 6 (5.00%) | 2 (0.84%) | 0.194 (0.286–0.953) | 0.053 | ||
| 2.28 ± 0.60 | 1.67 ± 0.83 | t = 7.161 | < 0.0001 | |||
| >logMAR2.3 | 60 (50.00%) | 79 (33.19%) | χ2 = 9.00 | 0.003 | 0.00 (Reference) | |
| ≦logMAR2.3 | 60 (50.00%) | 159 (66.81%) | 1.809 (1.052–3.100) | 0.032 | ||
| MD | 4 (3.33%) | 22 (9.24%) | χ2 = 87.15 | < 0.0001 | ||
| MD + IVI | 23 (19.17%) | 31 (13.03%) | ||||
| MD + IVI+PPV | 57 (47.50%) | 185 (77.73%) | ||||
| Enucleation | 36 (30.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||||
| 49 | 92 | – | ||||
| G+ bacteria | 35 (71.43%) | 80 (88.24%) | χ2 = 12.93 | 0.0047 | ||
| G- bacteria | 7 (14.29%) | 9 (8.24%) | ||||
| Mixed bacteria | 1 (2.04%) | 3 (3.53%) | ||||
| fungus | 6 (12.24%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||||
| No | 44 (55.00%) | 115 (69.28%) | χ2 = 4.814 | 0.0282 | ||
| Yes | 36 (45.00%) | 51 (30.72%) | ||||
| Metal | 27 (75.00%) | 44 (86.27%) | χ2 = 1.787 | 0.1812 | ||
| Non-metal | 9 (25.00%) | 7 (13.73%) | ||||
| 80 | 166 | χ2 = 7.398 | 0.0247 | – | ||
| Zone I | 58 (72.50%) | 139 (83.73%) | ||||
| Zone II | 18 (22.50%) | 26 (15.66%) | ||||
| Zone III | 4 (5.00%) | 1 (0.60%) | ||||
*246 cases of posttraumatic endophthalmitis were included in the χ2 test, but not in the Logistic regression analysis
** 141 cases of positive causative organism’s cultures were included in the in the χ2 test, but not the Logistic regression analysis
TM Therapy modalities, EC Etiological classification, CO Causative organisms, OR Odds ratio, PT Post-traumatic, PS Post-surgical, CA Corneal ulcer-associated, Ed Endogenous