| Literature DB >> 32600177 |
Inka Matuchova1,2,3, Petr Kelbich4,2,3, Jan Kubalik2,5, Eva Hanuljakova1,3, Ivan Stanek5, Vilem Maly5, Ondrej Karpjuk5, Jan Krejsek2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The predominance of neutrophils in pleural effusions of patients with different serious impairments of the pleural cavity organs is often found. The aim of this study was to identify the type of injury using the cytological-energy analysis of pleural effusions.Entities:
Keywords: coefficient of energy balance; complicated exudate; cytology of pleural effusions; empyema; exudate; inflammation; neutrophils; pleural effusions; pneumonia; transudate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32600177 PMCID: PMC7328477 DOI: 10.1177/1753466620935772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis ISSN: 1753-4658 Impact factor: 4.031
Figure 1.The first model of energy relationships in the pleural effusion–physiological response.
ATP, adenosine triphosphate; KEB, the coefficient of energy balance [in Czech ‘Koeficient Energetické Bilance’]; O2, oxygen
Figure 2.The second model of energy relationships in the pleural effusion–local inflammatory response.
ATP, adenosine triphosphate; KEB, the coefficient of energy balance [in Czech ‘Koeficient Energetické Bilance’]; O2, oxygen
Cytological-energy analysis of pleural effusions and concentrations of LDH and AST catalytic activities in pleural effusions.
| Median | Transudates | Post surgery without purulent
complication | Post surgery with purulent
complication | Exudates | Complicated exudates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purulent
pneumonia | Chest empyema | ||||
| Neutrophils, % |
|
|
|
|
|
| KEB |
|
|
|
|
|
| LDH, IU/L |
|
|
| C |
|
| AST, IU/L |
|
|
|
|
|
Groups sharing capital letters (A, B, C, D) are not significantly different as analysed by ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis test for multiple comparisons (family wise α = 0.05).
AST, aspartate aminotransferase; KEB, coefficient of energy balance; LDH, concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase catalytic activities in pleural effusions; n, number of patients
Specificities, sensitivities and diagnostic efficiencies of some traditional Light’s criteria parameters and KEB values in selected groups of patients.
| Parameters | Transudates | Exudates | Complicated exudates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purulent pneumonia | Chest empyema | |||
| Glucose | Specificity (%) | 64.9 | ND | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | 100.0 | ND | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) |
| ND | ND | |
| Lactate | Specificity (%) | 82.3 | ND | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | 91.5 | ND | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) |
| ND | ND | |
| LDH | Specificity (%) | 71.2 | ND | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | 98.3 | ND | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) |
| ND | ND | |
| Total protein | Specificity (%) | 64.9 | ND | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | 72.9 | ND | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) |
| ND | ND | |
| Glucose | Specificity (%) | ND | 45.1 | 65.6 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | 82.3 | 89.8 | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND |
|
| |
| Lactate | Specificity (%) | ND | 27.5 | 39.5 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | 91.7 | 94.0 | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND |
|
| |
| LDH | Specificity (%) | ND | 35.6 | 51.4 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | 65.6 | 84.5 | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND |
|
| |
| Total protein | Specificity (%) | ND | 40.6 | 44.3 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | 70.8 | 68.0 | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND |
|
| |
| KEB >20.0 | Specificity (%) | 83.2 | ND | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | 96.6 | ND | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) |
| ND | ND | |
| KEB <0.0 | Specificity (%) | ND | 43.2 | ND |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | 80.2 | ND | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND |
| ND | |
| KEB <−100.0 | Specificity (%) | ND | ND | 80.7 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ND | ND | 79.5 | |
| Dg. efficiency (%) | ND | ND |
| |
Diagnostic efficiency = .
Dg., diagnostic; KEB, coefficient of energy balance; LDH, concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase catalytic activities in pleural effusions; ND, not done
Figure 3.ROC curves for KEB value, glucose concentration and catalytic activity of LDH in the pleural effusions.
Glucose, glucose concentrations in the pleural effusions; KEB, coefficient of energy balance; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase catalytic activities in the pleural effusions; ROC, receiver operator characteristic
Comparison of the ROC curves for KEB values, glucose concentrations and LDH catalytic activities in purulent and non-purulent pleural effusions of our patients (p < 0.05 was considered as significant).
| Parameters | AUC | SE | 95% CI | Glucose | LDH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEB | 0.981 | 0.005 | 0.968–0.990 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Glucose | 0.963 | 0.007 | 0.946–0.977 | ND | <0.001 |
| LDH | 0.837 | 0.016 | 0.806–0.865 | ||
AUC, area under ROC curve; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval (binomial exact); Glucose, glucose concentrations in the pleural effusions; KEB, coefficient of energy balance; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase catalytic activities in the pleural effusions; ND, not done; ROC, receiver operator characteristic; SE, standard error (method of De Long et al.[33]).