| Literature DB >> 32599689 |
Wanchun Xu1,2, Zijing Pan1,2, Shan Lu1,2, Liang Zhang1,2.
Abstract
The increasing concerns of the geographical maldistribution of medical resources have sparked worldwide interests in exploring the potential of telemedicine in the rural health system. This study aimed to investigate the application and effect of telemedicine as well as their regional heterogeneity in the primary care centres in rural China. Based on the stratified multistage cluster sampling, a cross-sectional study was conducted among 358 township health centres (THCs) from eastern, central and western China. A self-administered questionnaire was used and the data of the Health Statistical Annual Reports in 2017 were collected to investigate the implication of telemedicine as well as the performance and other characteristics of each THCs. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of telemedicine application on the bed occupancy rate and the number of annual outpatient visits of the THCs, with comparison among the regions. The overall prevalence of telemedicine application was 58.66% in 2017, and it was found to increase the bed occupancy rate of the THCs in the national range (p < 0.1). When divided into different regions, telemedicine was found to improve the number of annual outpatient visits in western China (p < 0.05) and the bed occupancy rate in eastern China (p < 0.1). Disparities in the degree of remoteness and the capability of THCs among the regions were also found in this study, which may be the reasons for the regional heterogeneous effects of telemedicine. These findings suggested the potential of telemedicine in improving the utilization of primary care centres in rural areas. Further studies were needed to investigate the underlying reasons for its regional heterogeneous effects.Entities:
Keywords: propensity score matching; regional heterogeneity; telemedicine
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32599689 PMCID: PMC7345109 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Application of telemedicine among the investigated township health centres (THCs).
| Province | Number of THCs | THC with Telemedicine | Percent (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 358 | 210 | 58.66 | |
| Eastern region | 92 | 42 | 45.65 | |
| Guangdong | 34 | 2 | 5.88 | |
| Shandong | 58 | 40 | 68.97 | |
| Central region | 92 | 49 | 53.26 | |
| Hubei | 37 | 14 | 37.84 | |
| Henan | 55 | 35 | 63.64 | |
| Western region | 174 | 119 | 68.39 | |
| Chongqing | 118 | 68 | 57.63 | |
| Guizhou | 56 | 51 | 91.07 |
Characteristics of the investigated township health centres in different regions (frequency/mean(percent/SD)).
| Variables | Overall | Eastern | Central | Western |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel time to the county seat | |||||
| ≤1 h | 255 (71.23%) | 83 (90.22%) | 82 (89.13%) | 90 (51.72%) | <0.001 |
| >1 h | 103 (28.77%) | 9 (9.78%) | 10 (10.87%) | 84 (48.28%) | |
| Global budget for CMA 1 | |||||
| yes | 73 (20.39%) | 10 (10.87%) | 17 (18.48%) | 46 (26.44%) | 0.010 |
| no | 285 (79.61%) | 82 (89.13%) | 75 (81.52%) | 128 (73.56%) | |
| Surgical service provision | |||||
| yes | 162 (45.25%) | 38 (41.40%) | 62 (67.39%) | 62 (35.63%) | <0.001 |
| no | 196 (54.75%) | 54 (58.70%) | 30 (32.61%) | 112 (64.37%) | |
| Population size (in thousand) 2 | 29.13 (29.53) | 35.89 (21.55) | 40.10 (35.16) | 19.75 (26.99) | <0.001 |
| Proportion of the elders (%) | 11.72 (3.41) | 10.99 (1.88) | 10.59 (3.72) | 12.71 (3.58) | <0.001 |
| Number of the staff | 43.70 (32.85) | 56.99 (34.95) | 55.79 (38.61) | 30.28 (21.16) | <0.001 |
| Bed occupancy rate (%) | 63.42 (26.58) | 47.55 (24.28) | 73.80 (22.47) | 66.32 (26.14) | <0.001 |
| Outpatient visits (in thousand) 3 | 31.54 (37.86) | 25.94 (23.82) | 62.17 (57.73) | 18.31 (14.64) | <0.001 |
Note: 1 CMA: county medical alliance. 2 Population size (thousand): the number of the residents in the service area of the township health centre. 3 Outpatient visits (thousand): the number of outpatient visits of the THCs in 2017.
Characteristics of the investigated township health centres between groups in different regions (frequency/mean ± percent/SD).
| Variables | Classification | Adopters 1 | Nonadopters 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel time 3 (>1 h) | Overall | 64 (30.48%) | 39 (26.35%) | 0.396 |
| East | 2 (4.76%) | 7 (14.00%) | 0.137 | |
| Central | 7 (14.29%) | 3 (6.98%) | 0.261 | |
| West | 55 (46.22%) | 29 (52.73%) | 0.424 | |
| Global budget for CMA 4 (yes) | Overall | 47 (22.38) | 26 (17.57%) | 0.266 |
| East | 6 (14.29%) | 4 (8.00%) | 0.335 | |
| Central | 8 (16.33%) | 9 (20.93%) | 0.570 | |
| West | 33 (27.73%) | 13 (23.64%) | 0.569 | |
| Surgical service provision (yes) | Overall | 103 (49.05%) | 59 (39.86%) | 0.086 |
| East | 27 (64.29%) | 11 (22.00%) | <0.001 | |
| Central | 32 (65.31%) | 30 (69.77%) | 0.649 | |
| West | 44 (36.97%) | 18 (32.73%) | 0.586 | |
| Population size (in thousand) 5 | Overall | 31.71 (2.48) | 25.46 (1.31) | 0.048 |
| East | 49.25 (3.23) | 24.68 (2.07) | <0.001 | |
| Central | 41.22 (6.67) | 38.83 (2.06) | 0.747 | |
| West | 21.61 (2.91) | 15.72 (1.43) | 0.182 | |
| Proportion of the elders (%) | Overall | 11.72 (0.18) | 12.11(0.28) | 0.073 |
| East | 11.71 (0.34) | 10.38 (0.18) | <0.001 | |
| Central | 9.86 (0.53) | 11.42 (0.55) | 0.044 | |
| West | 12.02 (0.31) | 14.22 (0.47) | <0.001 | |
| Number of the staff | Overall | 41.78 (2.20) | 46.42 (2.80) | 0.189 |
| East | 67.57 (5.17) | 48.10 (4.80) | 0.007 | |
| Central | 45.53 (5.45) | 67.49 (5.51) | 0.006 | |
| West | 31.13 (1.98) | 28.42 (2.73) | 0.433 | |
| Bed occupancy rate (%) | Overall | 66.10 (1.75) | 59.61 (2.29) | 0.022 |
| East | 57.69 (3.67) | 39.04 (3.03) | <0.001 | |
| Central | 72.00 (3.40) | 75.86 (3.19) | 0.414 | |
| West | 66.65 (2.37) | 65.60 (3.63) | 0.807 | |
| Outpatient visits (in thousand) 6 | Overall | 29.83 (2.15) | 33.97 (3.76) | 0.310 |
| East | 26.86 (2.27) | 25.17 (4.17) | 0.736 | |
| Central | 53.97 (7.33) | 71.52 (9.70) | 0.147 | |
| West | 20.94 (1.43) | 12.60 (1.41) | <0.001 |
Note: 1 Adopters: telemedicine adopters. 2 Nonadopters: telemedicine nonadopters. 3 Travel time: travel time to the county seat by bus. 4 CMA: county medical alliance. 5 Population size (thousand): the number of the residents in the service area of the township health centre. 6 Outpatient visits (thousand): the number of outpatient visits of the THCs in 2017.
Results of propensity score matching.
| Outcome Indicators | Matching Algorithm | Mean of Indicators | Results of ATT | Quality of Matching | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | ATT |
| S.E. 1 | 95% CI 1 | Mean Bias | Media Bias | Pseudo R2 | LRχ 2 | ||||
| Overall | |||||||||||||
| NOV 2 | Raw 3 | 29.83 | 33.97 | −4.13 | −1.02 | 15.4 | 14.1 | 0.051 | 24.90 | <0.001 | |||
| NNM | 29.49 | 30.99 | −1.50 | −0.26 | 5.56 | 0.787 | (−12.40, 9.39) | 8.7 | 8.6 | 0.007 | 4.30 | 0.545 | |
| RBM | 29.24 | 31.06 | −1.83 | −0.38 | 3.62 | 0.614 | (−8.93, 5.27) | 3.9 | 3.6 | 0.002 | 1.40 | 0.924 | |
| KBM | 29.49 | 31.81 | −2.32 | −0.49 | 3.38 | 0.493 | (−8.95, 4.31) | 3.1 | 3.7 | 0.002 | 0.96 | 0.966 | |
| BOR 4(%) | Raw | 66.10 | 59.61 | 6.50 | 2.29 | 15.9 | 16.3 | 0.061 | 29.42 | <0.001 | |||
| NNM | 66.20 | 60.72 | 5.48 | 1.31 | 0.05 | 0.234 | (−0.11, 12.77) | 7.7 | 5.8 | 0.013 | 7.12 | 0.310 | |
| RBM | 66.20 | 60.34 | 5.85 | 1.72 | 0.03 |
| (−1.06, 12.77) | 3.7 | 3.0 | 0.002 | 1.10 | 0.981 | |
| KBM | 66.20 | 60.46 | 5.74 | 1.76 | 0.03 |
| (−0.2, 11.71) | 3.1 | 3.2 | 0.001 | 0.79 | 0.992 | |
| Eastern China | |||||||||||||
| NOV | Raw | 26.86 | 25.17 | 1.70 | 0.34 | 63.8 | 57.7 | 0.374 | 47.42 | <0.001 | |||
| NNM | 23.83 | 32.52 | −8.69 | −0.73 | 12.01 | 0.469 | (−32.22, 14.84) | 14.7 | 9.2 | 0.060 | 4.80 | 0.570 | |
| RBM | 24.49 | 37.56 | −13.07 | −1.27 | 12.44 | 0.294 | (−37.46,11.32) | 13.8 | 12.5 | 0.018 | 0.970 | 0.965 | |
| KBM | 23.83 | 33.13 | −9.30 | −1.13 | 8.89 | 0.296 | (−26.72, 8.13) | 7.6 | 6.3 | 0.009 | 0.740 | 0.981 | |
| BOR (%) | Raw | 57.69 | 39.04 | 18.65 | 3.95 | 68.7 | 65.7 | 0.405 | 51.37 | <0.001 | |||
| NNM | 56.81 | 42.50 | 14.31 | 1.73 | 0.09 | 0.117 | (−4.05, 32.68) | 17.2 | 20.2 | 0.060 | 5.36 | 0.498 | |
| RBM | 53.14 | 34.84 | 18.29 | 2.46 | 0.12 | 0.119 | (−4.82, 41.41) | 22.4 | 24.4 | 0.086 | 5.24 | 0.513 | |
| KBM | 56.77 | 41.57 | 15.20 | 2.02 | 0.09 |
| (−3.69, 34.09) | 14.3 | 13.7 | 0.062 | 5.35 | 0.500 | |
| Central China | |||||||||||||
| NOV | Raw | 53.97 | 71.52 | −17.55 | −1.46 | 28.8 | 23.6 | 0.167 | 21.18 | 0.001 | |||
| NNM | 53.11 | 52.97 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 13.55 | 0.992 | (−26.41, 26.69) | 5.8 | 6.0 | 0.008 | 1.02 | 0.961 | |
| RBM | 55.53 | 51.66 | 3.87 | 0.33 | 16.87 | 0.819 | (−29.21, 36.95) | 8.1 | 6.1 | 0.030 | 3.41 | 0.637 | |
| KBM | 53.11 | 54.98 | −1.87 | −0.18 | 12.25 | 0.879 | (−25.87, 22.13) | 5.7 | 6.2 | 0.010 | 1.25 | 0.940 | |
| BOR (%) | Raw | 72.00 | 75.86 | −3.86 | −0.82 | 25.6 | 17.7 | 0.172 | 21.83 | 0.001 | |||
| NNM | 72.66 | 76.79 | −4.13 | −0.69 | 0.08 | 0.626 | (−21.49, 13.23) | 14.5 | 13.0 | 0.041 | 5.31 | 0.504 | |
| RBM | 73.84 | 74.82 | −0.97 | −0.16 | 0.09 | 0.914 | (−19.18, 17.22) | 10.1 | 9.8 | 0.029 | 3.43 | 0.754 | |
| KBM | 72.66 | 76.47 | −3.81 | −0.66 | 0.08 | 0.620 | (−19.75, 12.14) | 8.5 | 8.1 | 0.019 | 2.45 | 0.874 | |
| Western China | |||||||||||||
| NOV | Raw | 20.94 | 12.60 | 8.34 | 3.61 | 24.8 | 13.0 | 0.087 | 19.00 | 0.002 | |||
| NNM | 20.70 | 14.80 | 5.90 | 2.04 | 2.84 |
| (0.33, 11.5) | 12.5 | 12.9 | 0.047 | 14.83 | 0.011 | |
| RBM | 20.79 | 15.28 | 5.51 | 2.07 | 2.50 |
| (0.61, 10.41) | 9.0 | 9.7 | 0.028 | 8.68 | 0.123 | |
| KBM | 20.59 | 15.06 | 5.53 | 2.34 | 2.15 |
| (1.31, 9.75) | 6.4 | 8.5 | 0.018 | 5.57 | 0.350 | |
| BOR (%) | Raw | 66.65 | 65.60 | 1.05 | 0.25 | 22.1 | 13.0 | 0.088 | 19.20 | 0.004 | |||
| NNM | 66.92 | 68.65 | −1.73 | −0.29 | 0.07 | 0.769 | (−16.03, 11.73) | 10.3 | 8.4 | 0.035 | 10.62 | 0.101 | |
| RBM | 66.84 | 69.08 | −2.23 | −0.38 | 0.07 | 0.746 | (−14.97, 10.50) | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0.017 | 4.74 | 0.577 | |
| KBM | 66.96 | 66.03 | 0.93 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.873 | (−10.81, 12.68) | 5.6 | 6.5 | 0.015 | 4.45 | 0.616 | |
Note: 1 The standard error, p-value and 95% CI of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) were obtained through the bootstrap method. 2 NOV: number of annual outpatient services (in thousands). 3 Raw: raw sample. 4 BOR: bed occupancy rate.