Literature DB >> 32599172

Perceived Discriminatory Factors that Impact Prenatal Care Satisfaction and Attendance Among Adolescent and Young Adult Couples.

Brianna Dillon1, Tashuna Albritton2, Rose Saint Fleur-Calixte2, Lisa Rosenthal3, Trace Kershaw4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify possible discriminatory factors that lead to prenatal care dissatisfaction and disengagement from prenatal care among young, expecting couples with a focus on exploring the experiences of Black and Latinx participants.
METHODS: A total of 296 young adolescent couples were recruited. Each couple consisted of an expecting female (ExpF) and an expecting male (ExpM). Participants were asked to give responses to a survey, and data was collected at 3 different time points. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 296 expecting young couples.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from obstetrics and gynecology clinics and ultrasound clinics from 4 university-affiliated hospitals in southern Connecticut. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was prenatal care satisfaction. The secondary outcome was number of prenatal care visits that were attended by each member of the couple dyad. Both of these outcomes were assessed to evaluate whether discriminatory factors that participants experienced in healthcare had an effect on each outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 51 males (17.5%) and 36 females (12.4%) reported a perception of experiencing discrimination in the healthcare system a few times a year or more. Those who believed that race contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.45 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .018). Those who believed that age contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.74 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .001). Participants who believed that physical appearance contributed to discrimination in the healthcare system were 2.83 times more likely to have an unpleasant prenatal visit (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Black and Latinx young expecting couples are not exempt from discriminatory experiences during prenatal care. Recommendations for quality improvement in prenatal healthcare settings include implementation of standard evaluative measures specific to personal treatment and supportiveness of the medical team.
Copyright © 2020 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maternal and infant health; Prenatal care; Race/ethnicity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32599172      PMCID: PMC7530015          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  18 in total

1.  Race, ethnicity, and the health care system: public perceptions and experiences.

Authors:  M Lillie-Blanton; M Brodie; D Rowland; D Altman; M McIntosh
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  The social psychology of stigma.

Authors:  Brenda Major; Laurie T O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 3.  Race, racism, and racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Tyan Parker Dominguez
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Perceived discrimination and psychological distress in Sweden.

Authors:  Sarah Wamala; Gunnel Boström; Karin Nyqvist
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Death by a thousand cuts: The health implications of black respectability politics.

Authors:  Hedwig Lee; Margaret Takako Hicken
Journal:  Souls       Date:  2016-12-14

6.  Health Care Engagement and Follow-up After Perceived Discrimination in Maternity Care.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Skin Tone Matters: Racial Microaggressions and Delayed Prenatal Care.

Authors:  Jaime C Slaughter-Acey; Devon Sneed; Lauren Parker; Verna M Keith; Nora L Lee; Dawn P Misra
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Differentiating the barriers to adequate prenatal care in Missouri, 1987-88.

Authors:  M R Sable; J W Stockbauer; W F Schramm; G H Land
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Patient Experiences with Pregnancy Planning and Perspectives on Reproductive Care in Community Health Centers: A Qualitative Study of African American Women in Chicago.

Authors:  Rachel E Stones; Debra B Stulberg; Jennifer K Bello Kottenstette
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-12-05

10.  Patient-reported Communication Quality and Perceived Discrimination in Maternity Care.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Demolishing the Myth of the Default Human That Is Killing Black Mothers.

Authors:  Stephanie R M Bray; Monica R McLemore
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.