| Literature DB >> 32599079 |
Amato Santoro1, Claudia Baiocchi2, Giuseppe Lumia3, Valerio Zacà3, Andrea Romano2, Lucia Spera2, Mario Stricagnoli2, Francesca Falciani4, Serafina Valente2, Achille Gaspardone3, Sergio Mondillo2, Filippo Lamberti3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oesophageal changes and injuries were recorded after atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation procedures. The reduction of power in the posterior left atrial(LA) wall(closest to the oesophagus) and the monitoring of temperature in the oesophagus(OE) reduced oesophageal injuries. The intracardiac-echocardiography(ICE) with a Cartosound module provides two-dimensional imaging (2D) to assess detailed cardiac anatomy and its relationship with the OE. The aim of this study was to highlight the safety and feasibility of 3D-reconstruction of the oesophageal course in left atrial catheter ablation(CA) procedures without OE temperature probe or quadripolar catheter to guide ICE OE reconstruction.Entities:
Keywords: Cartosound; Intracardiac echocardiography; Left atrial catheter ablation; Oesophageal fistula; Oesophageal imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32599079 PMCID: PMC7691774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.06.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ISSN: 0972-6292
.Biometric data of the study population. BSA: body surface area; CAD: coronary artery disease, LAV: left atrial volume; LAVi: left atrial volume indexed by BSA; LVEF: Left ventricle ejection fraction.
| Biometric data of Study Population | Total (n. 180) | Group a (n. 109) | Group b (n.71) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age years (mean/st. dev.) | 62.2 ± 5.9 | 63.2 ± 9.4 | 61.1 ± 2.6 | NS |
| BSA (mean/st. dev.) | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 2.19 ± 0.6 | NS |
| Male (n/%) | 144/80 | 87/80 | 57/80.2 | NS |
| Hypertension (n/%) | 97/53.9 | 62/57 | 35/49.3 | NS |
| Diabetes (n/%) | 52/28.9 | 30/28 | 22/31.1 | NS |
| Smokers (n/%) | 57/31.7 | 35/32 | 22/31.1 | NS |
| CAD (n/%) | 64/35.6 | 39/36 | 25/35.2 | NS |
| Dyslipidemia (n/%) | 80/44.5 | 48/44 | 32/45.1 | NS |
| LVEF %(mean/st. dev.) | 64.8 ± 12.6 | 65.1 ± 13 | 64.5 ± 12.2 | NS |
| LAV ml (mean/st. dev.) | 54.9 ± 6.9 | 55.3 ± 7.6 | 54.4 ± 6.2 | NS |
| LAVi ml/m2 (mean/st. dev.) | 29.3 ± 4.9 | 29.7 ± 5.4 | 28.9 ± 4.3 | NS |
| Antiarrhytmics drugs (n/%) | 147/81.7 | 89/82 | 58/81.7 | NS |
| Atrial fibrillation (n/%) | 125/69.5 | 76/70 | 49/60 | NS |
| Incisional atrial tachycardia (n/%) | 37/20.6 | 22/20 | 15/21.1 | NS |
| Left atrial tachycardia (n/%) | 19/10.6 | 11/10 | 8/11.2 | NS |
Fig. 1EAM with pulmonary veins and OE. The locations of the OE to the posterior left atrium was leftward in the left image, midline in the central image and rightward in the right image. RIPV: right inferior pulmonary vein. RSPV: right superior pulmonary vein. LIPV: left inferior pulmonary vein. LSPV: left superior pulmonary vein.
Fig. 2a–b) EAM with pulmonary veins and OE. The OE was interpolated with an ultrasound beam. CS: coronary sinus catheter, painted green. c) 2D ultrasound beam with a green tracked OE during ICE acquisition.
Fig. 3.Particular course of the OE. The OE course of this patient had a very particular course on the leftward side between the left pulmonary veins. RSPV: right superior pulmonary vein. LIPV: left inferior pulmonary vein. LSPV: left superior pulmonary vein. LAA: left atrial appendage.
Fig. 4.The left critical isthmus was precisely posterior to the oesophageal course. RSPV: right superior pulmonary vein. LIPV: left inferior pulmonary vein. LSPV: left superior pulmonary vein. CS: coronary sinus catheter.