| Literature DB >> 32597388 |
Miguel Reina Ortiz1, Mario J Grijalva2,3, Michael J Turell4, William F Waters5, Andres Carrazco Montalvo6, Derrick Mathias7, Vinita Sharma8,9, Christian Fierro Renoy10, Paul Suits11, Stephen J Thomas11, Renato Leon6.
Abstract
Population adoption of social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic is at times deficient, increasing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Healthcare workers and those living in areas of intense transmission may benefit from implementing biosafety measures in their daily lives. A mixed-methods approach, combining components of single negotiation text and the Delphi method, was used to create a COVID-19 biosafety-at-home protocol. A consensus building coordinator liaised with 12 experts to develop the protocol over 11 iterations. Experts had more than 200 years of combined experience in epidemiology, virology, infectious disease prevention, and public health. A flyer, created from the final protocol, was professionally designed and initially distributed via social media and institutional websites/emails in Ecuador beginning on May 2, 2020. Since then, it has been distributed in other countries, reaching ∼7,000 people. Translating research laboratory biosafety measures for the home/street environment might be challenging. The biosafety-at-home flyer addresses this challenge in a user-friendly format.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32597388 PMCID: PMC7410461 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Figure 1.Development of biosafety-at-home flyer. Green boxes represent single negotiation text process. Blue boxes represent components used from the Delphi method. Black boxes represent post-agreement processes.
Role, professional, and research expertise of selected experts
| Expert | Role | Field of experience | Years of experience | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biosafety measures | Epidemiology | Public health | Infectious disease prevention | Laboratory | Field | Clinical | ||
| Expert 1 | A | X | X | X | X | > 40 | > 40 | – |
| Expert 2 | A | X | X | X | X | 28 | 28 | – |
| Expert 3 | A | – | – | X | – | – | > 25 | – |
| Expert 4 | A | X | X | X | X | 3 | 12 | 3 |
| Expert 5 | A | X | X | X | – | 5 | 5 | – |
| Expert 6 | A | X | – | – | X | – | – | 25 |
| Expert 7 | R | – | X | X | X | 0 | 9 | – |
| Expert 8 | R | X | – | X | – | 22 | – | – |
| Expert 9 | A | X | – | X | X | 14 | 14 | – |
| Expert 10 | A | X | X | X | X | 15 | 9 | 24 |
| Expert 11 | A | X | – | – | X | 16 | 13 | – |
| Expert 12 | R | – | – | – | X | 20 | 20 | – |
A = author (named); R = reviewer (anonymous). Note: The order of experts in this table does not reflect the order of authors on this article nor the order of authors in the biosafety-at-home flyer shown in the Supplementary Materials. Expertise was self-reported or inferred from CVs and publicly available expertise information.
Biosafety-at-home flyer distribution as of June 14, 2020
| Distribution means | Reach |
|---|---|
| Social media—institutional profiles, number of shares | |
| Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador | 201 |
| USFQ | 79 |
| CISeAL | 61 |
| Other | 212 |
| Social media—personal profiles, number of shares | |
| All coauthors and their contacts | 150 |
| Institutional websites, readership | |
| CISeAL | ∼3,000 |
| Universidad San Francisco de Quito | ∼3,000 |
CISeAL = Center for Research on Health in Latin America; USFQ = Universidad San Francisco de Quito.
Other includes a digital newspaper, biotechnology, and clinical laboratory interest social media groups.