Literature DB >> 32596992

'It is always worth the extra effort': Organizational structures and barriers to collaboration with consumers in mental health research: Perspectives of non-consumer researcher allies.

Brenda Happell1, Sarah Gordon2, Cath Roper3, Brett Scholz4, Pete Ellis2, Shifra Waks5, Terri Warner6,7, Chris Platania-Phung8.   

Abstract

Consumer collaboration in mental health research has demonstrated significant benefits and reflects both contemporary research practice and policy goals for the expected genuine involvement of consumers in all aspects of mental health service delivery. Notable barriers have been identified as impeding consumer researcher positions that must be better understood and ultimately addressed. The aim of this research was to better understand these barriers from the perspectives of non-consumer researchers who have worked collegially with consumer researchers. We developed a self-report survey, Consumers as Researchers in Mental Health (CaRiMH) and administered it to non-consumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Findings suggest a lack of organizational structures to support both consumer research and capacity building of consumer researchers. Most consumer researchers were employed casually with no set hours. Although consumer researchers were typically remunerated, inadequate funding and inflexibility of employment were highlighted as major barriers. There was variation in opinion about token involvement of consumer researchers and some uncertainty about whether these roles, where they existed, were actively resisted. Despite the acknowledged barriers, participants were positive about collaborations with consumer researchers. Overall, findings suggest consumer research is unlikely to proliferate without greater attention to organizational structures. A systematic and strategic approach to advancing mental health consumer research is required, including extra-organizational policy factors.
© 2020 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allies; barriers; consumer participation; lived experience; mental health; organizational structures; researchers

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32596992     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  3 in total

1.  A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Jane Desborough; Anne Parkinson; Fiona Lewis; Harry Ebbeck; Michelle Banfield; Christine Phillips
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Power, recovery and doing something worthwhile: A thematic analysis of expert patient perspectives in psychiatry education.

Authors:  Katie Ward; Miriam Stanyon; Karl Ryan; Subodh Dave
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Creating or taking opportunity: Strategies for implementing expert by experience positions in mental health academia.

Authors:  Brenda Happell; Aine O Donovan; Terri Warner; Julie Sharrock; Sarah Gordon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 2.720

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.