Literature DB >> 32596969

Sexual dimorphism in facial shape of modern Buryats of Southern Siberia.

Victoria V Rostovtseva1, Anna A Mezentseva2, Sonja Windhager3, Marina L Butovskaya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate sexual dimorphism in the full facial shape of modern Buryats-people of Southern Siberia of Mongolian origin.
METHODS: For this purpose, we have used geometric morphometrics based on standardized full-face frontal photographs. This allowed us to assess and visualize differences in facial shapes between Buryat men (n = 98) and women (n = 89). To specify the facial areas, where the differences occurred, we have complemented our analysis with standard anthropometric facial parameters based on approximations to the craniofacial and mandibular landmarks and soft-tissue morphology of specific facial areas.
RESULTS: Our results revealed that Buryat women have a set of sexually dimorphic features similar to those reported earlier for other Asian populations (a relatively wider and vertically shorter lower face, more round visible areas of the eyes, relatively narrower noses, smaller mouths, larger [in vertical dimension] foreheads, and relatively thinner upper lips, when compared to Buryat males). At the same time, Buryat women had a specific characteristic, distinguishing them from other world populations-a significantly higher upper face width-to-height ratio (fWHR) compared to males. This indicates that the high fWHR is not a universally male feature in humans, which raises a question of underlying developmental mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results clearly demonstrate that some elements of sexually dimorphic facial shapes may differ across populations with different genetic and ecological backgrounds, and suggest that universal mechanisms of sex-specific facial morphogenesis still need to be clarified in the future.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32596969     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  4 in total

1.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai.

Authors:  Marina L Butovskaya; Victoria V Rostovtseva; Anna A Mezentseva
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in Buryats of Southern Siberia.

Authors:  Victoria V Rostovtseva; Anna A Mezentseva; Sonja Windhager; Marina L Butovskaya
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (rs53576) and digit ratio associates with aggression: comparison in seven ethnic groups.

Authors:  Marina Butovskaya; Victoria Rostovtseva; Polina Butovskaya; Valentina Burkova; Daria Dronova; Vasilisa Filatova; Eugenia Sukhodolskaya; Vasiliy Vasiliev; Tania Mesa; Araceli Rosa; Oleg Lazebny
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.867

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.