Mamdouh Attia Abu-Zaied1, Sherif F Hammad2,3, Fathi T Halaweish4, Galal Hamza Elgemeie5. 1. Green Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt. 2. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt. 3. Basic and Applied Sciences Institute, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), P.O Box 179, New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria 21934, Egypt. 4. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007, United States. 5. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt.
Abstract
The synthesis and antiviral screening of the first reported series of pyridine- and pyrimidine-based thioglycoside phosphoramidates are herein reported. They were prepared through two synthetic steps: The first step is via coupling of mercapto-derivatized heterocyclic bases with the appropriate α-bromo per-acetylated sugars. The second one is the hydrolysis of the acetate esters under basic conditions that were consequently conjugated with the phosphoramidating reagent to afford the desired thioglycoside protides. Eight compounds were evaluated for their antiviral activities against different viral cell lines, namely, adenovirus 7, HAV (hepatitis A) HM175, Coxsackievirus B4, and HSV-1 (herpes simplex virus type 1), in addition to the antiviral bioassay against ED-43/SG-Feo (VYG) replicon of HCV (hepatitis C virus) genotype 4a. Both compounds 5b and 11 showed notable antiviral activity against Coxsackie virus B4, reflected from the CC50 values of 17 and 20 μg/100 μL and IC50 values of 4.5 and 6.0 μg/100 μL, respectively. Same two compounds elicited remarkable activities toward herpes simplex virus type 1, represented by CC50 values of 17 and 16 μg/100 μL and IC50 values of 6.3 and 6.6 μg/100 μL, respectively. Combination of 11 with acyclovir elicited a notable synergistic activity in comparison with acyclovir alone, as inferred from herpes simplex polymerase enzyme inhibitory assay values of 2.64 and 4.78 μg/100 mL, respectively. Only compound 11 elicited a remarkable activity against HCV. Potential promising activities of compound 11 have been shown with respect to CC50, IC50, and enzyme assay inhibitory activities.
The synthesis and antiviral screening of the first reported series of pyridine- and pyrimidine-based thioglycosidephosphoramidates are herein reported. They were prepared through two synthetic steps: The first step is via coupling of mercapto-derivatized heterocyclic bases with the appropriate α-bromo per-acetylated sugars. The second one is the hydrolysis of the acetate esters under basicconditions that were consequently conjugated with the phosphoramidating reagent to afford the desired thioglycosideprotides. Eight compounds were evaluated for their antiviral activities against different viral cell lines, namely, adenovirus 7, HAV (hepatitis A) HM175, Coxsackievirus B4, and HSV-1 (herpes simplex virus type 1), in addition to the antiviral bioassay against ED-43/SG-Feo (VYG) replicon of HCV (hepatitis C virus) genotype 4a. Both compounds 5b and 11 showed notable antiviral activity against Coxsackie virus B4, reflected from the CC50 values of 17 and 20 μg/100 μL and IC50 values of 4.5 and 6.0 μg/100 μL, respectively. Same two compounds elicited remarkable activities toward herpes simplex virus type 1, represented by CC50 values of 17 and 16 μg/100 μL and IC50 values of 6.3 and 6.6 μg/100 μL, respectively. Combination of 11 with acyclovir elicited a notable synergistic activity in comparison with acyclovir alone, as inferred from herpes simplex polymerase enzyme inhibitory assay values of 2.64 and 4.78 μg/100 mL, respectively. Only compound 11 elicited a remarkable activity against HCV. Potential promising activities of compound 11 have been shown with respect to CC50, IC50, and enzyme assay inhibitory activities.
A considerable number of various illnesses are accounted for by
DNA and RNA viruses in humans and animal hosts.[1] Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), which is a type of
DNA virus belonging to the herpes virus family, is incriminated in
the infection of mucocutaneous epithelial cells and in the establishment
of some ganglionic sensory latencies.[2] Acyclovir
(Figure ) has been
referred to as the gold standard medication for the treatment of HSV
infections.[3,4]
Figure 1
Chemical structures of some clinically used
antiviral drugs.
Chemical structures of some clinically used
antiviral drugs.In addition, humanadenoviruses,
which are another class of DNA-containing
viruses, are responsible for various ocular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal
tract infections.[5,6] Although there is no current FDA-approved
medication protocol for the treatment of adenovirus infections, the
broad-spectrum antiviral drug cidofovircould be used in some responsive
patients.[7−9]On the other hand, Coxsackievirus B4 (CV B4),
hepatitis A virus
(HAV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a few examples of enveloped
single-stranded RNA-containing viruses. Coxsackieviruses are commonly
accused of causing viral myocarditis, accompanied with the development
of pancreatitis, encephalitis, meningitis, pleurodynia, and hepatitis.[10,11] While there are curative direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV,
there is no specific medication for both CV B4 and HAV. Among the
DDAcurative treatments of HCV are the protease inhibitor simprivir,
NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir, and polymerase NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir.[12,13]About half of the number of the clinically used antiviral
drugs
is nucleos(t)ides; hence, the improvement of the overall tolerability
and pharmacokinetic profile is of a major priority in the conceptual
design and development of newly synthesized antiviral agents.[14,15] One of the most successful strategies to surmount the poor bioavailability
of nucleosides and to deliver the therapeutically active 5-monophosphate
is to mask the polar 5-hydroxyl functionality with aryloxy triesterphosphoramidate.[16,17] This methodology is known as
“Protide” technology in which the bioavailable phosphoramidate
prodrug, after absorption and distribution, releases its nucleoside
monophosphate after two sequential hydrolytic events by an esterase-type
enzyme such as cathepsin A and a phosphoramidase-type enzyme such
as hint-1.[18,19] So far, sofosbuvir that was FDA-approved
in late 2013 and tenofovir alafenamide that was FDA-approved in late
2015 for HIV are the only two phosphoramidate nucleotide prodrugs
that are clinically used, and many others are now in different phases
of clinical trials[20] (Figure ).Thioglycosides, where
the anomericcarbon of the sugar motif is
connected to the proper heterocyclic or any other aglycon by a sulfur
atom through a thioether bond, have proven to be of biological interest.
As a part of our current project to explore synthetic methods for
the preparation of S-glycosylated derivatives of
heterocyclicnitrogen bases, we have recently reported on the synthesis
and anticancer and antiviral activities of a number of acyclic and
heterocyclicthioglycosides that have an interesting cytotoxic activity
such as cyanoethylene thioglycosides,[21,22] pyridinethioglcosides,[23,24] pyrimidine thioglycosides,[25] imidazole
thioglycosides,[26] pyrazole thioglycosides,[27] triazole thioglycosides,[28] oxadiazole thioglycosides,[29] thiophene thioglycosides,[30] quinoline
thioglycosides,[31] thienopyrazole thioglycosides,[32] and pyrazolopyrimidine thioglycosides.[33,34] We have reported that the thioglycosides of dihydropyridine shows
a strong P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist and has activity against
humancolon carcinomacells.[35] In light
of these findings and our previous reports, the purpose of this work
was to design and synthesize the novel and first reported pyridine-
and pyrimidine-based thioglycosidephosphoramidates as sofosbuvirthio-analogues.Owing to the endless mutations and the emergence
of numerous multidrug-resistant
viral strains, the arena of developing novel broad-spectrum, less
toxic, and bioavailable antiviral medicines is warmly welcoming new
frontiers. Driven by the aforementioned facts and aiming to explore
novel antiviral drug candidates of promising potency, selectivity,
bioavailability, and safety profile, we have incorporated the phosphoramidate
functionality to pyridine- and pyrimidine-based thioglycosides, exploiting
the molecular hybridization and protide strategic approaches in the
first reported thioglycosidephosphoramidates. It was suggested that
such a combination is believed to give some insights into the effect
of this drug latentation technique in improving the biological activity
of thioglycosides in such a way that hopefully may offer affordable,
synthetically accessible, and effective antiviral analogs.
Results and Discussion
Chemistry
The
per-acetylated pyridine
and pyrimidine-based thioglycosides 3a, 3b, 10, 14a, 14b, 18a, and 18bhave been synthesized through nucleophilic
substitution coupling of tautomericthiol-containing heterocyclic
bases 1, 13, or 17 with the
corresponding α-bromo-sugar 2a, 2b, or 9. The glycosidic linkage that connects the heterocyclic
base to the anomericcarbon of the sugar was through the sulfur atom
of the thioamide moiety of the base rather than through the nitrogen
atom, as depicted in Scheme . This thioglycosidicconnection was elucidated and confirmed
by X-ray crystallography of compounds 5a and 14b, as shown in Figures and 3.[36,37]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Pyridine Thioglycoside
Derivatives 5a and 5b
Figure 2
X-ray crystal structure of compound 5a.
Figure 3
X-ray crystal structure of compound 14b.
X-ray crystal structure of compound 5a.X-ray crystal structure of compound 14b.The unprotected thioglycosides5a, 5b, 11, 15a, 15b, 19a, and 19b were uneventfully obtained
by ammonolysis
of the acetate esters under basicconditions of methanolicammonia.
The following regioselective phosphoramidatecoupling was successfully
achieved via the alkoxide generation of all of the unprotected hydroxyl
groups of the sugar part of the nucleosides using the proper molar
ratio of a strong base. In the current work, it was anticipated that
the Grignard reagent isopropyl magnesium chloride would be sufficiently
basic to abstract the protons from the free hydroxyl groups of the
deacetylated nucleosides to furnish the desired alkoxide anions[38] (Schemes and 4–6).
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Pyridine Thioglycoside Phosphoramidate Derivatives 8a and 8b
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Pyridine Phosphoramidate Derivative 12
Scheme 6
Synthesis of Pyrimidine Thioglycoside Phosphoramidate Derivatives 20a and 20b
The preferential regioselectivity was essentially based on the
differential nucleophilicity of the formed alkoxide. The most nucleophilicalkoxide that is capable of performing the required nucleophilic attack
on the electrophiliccenter of the phosphoramidate phosphorus would
be the primary alkoxide due to both electronic and steric effects
that are believed to play roles in orientation of the phosphoramidate
tail of the targeted nucleotides through the SN2 reaction,
as proposed in Scheme .
Scheme 3
Proposed Mechanism for the Regioselective Phosphoramidate Coupling
Antiviral Screening
A preliminary
antiviral screening was initially performed for eight different nucleos(t)ides
of the newly synthesized analogs that comprise both pyridine and pyrimidinethioglycosides at either the free unprotected or phosphoramidated
levels. These tested compounds are 5b, 8a, 8b, 11, and 12 of the pyridine-based
analogs, among which compounds 5b and 11 represent the unprotected nucleosides, while compounds 8a, 8b, and 12 are from the protide type.
On the other hand, compounds 19a, 20a, and 20b are the tested ones from the pyrimidine-based congeners,
of which only compound 19a represents the free unprotected
analog, while both 20a and 20b are the phosphoramidate
nucleotide analogs. These compounds were tested on both DNA- and RNA-containing
viruses. Both adenovirus and HSV-1 are representatives of the DNA-containing
viruses, while Coxsackie virus B4, hepatitis A virus, and HCV are
representatives of the RNA-containing viruses.
Cytotoxicity
Assay
Cytotoxicity
assay was carried out via cell morphology evaluation using an inverted
light microscope and cell viability test applying the trypan blue
dye exclusion method where the nontoxic doses of the tested compounds
were determined based on the assay on FRHK-4, Hep2, BGM, Vero, and
Huh 7.5cell lines prior the application on the targeted viruses.
The values of the nontoxic doses of the tested compounds ranged from
70 to 100 μg/mL, as shown in Table and Figure . It could be inferred from the tabulated results of
the nontoxic dose determination of the tested compounds that both
compounds 5b and 11 showed the highest safety
profile that could participate in a relatively wider therapeutic index
compared to the rest of compounds. The higher the nontoxic dose value,
the higher the safety profile; therefore, compound 11 exhibited the safest profile among all the tested compounds with
100 μg/mL nontoxic dose against all the tested cell lines, except
against BGMcell line, which showed a 90 μg/mL value. The second
safest compound is 5b that showed a 90 μg/mL nontoxic
dose against all the tested cell lines, except against Hep2cell line,
which showed a 100 μg/mL value. On the other side, both compounds 19a and 20b showed the least safe dosing profile
among the test compounds with 70–80 μg/mL nontoxic dose
values against all the tested cell lines.
Table 1
Nontoxic
Doses of Tested Compounds
on FRHK-4, Hep2, BGM, Vero, and Huh 7.5 Cell Lines
nontoxic
dose
compound
no.
FRHK-4 cell line (μg/mL)
Hep2 cell
line (μg/mL)
BGM cell
line (μg/mL)
Vero cell
line (μg/mL)
Huh 7.5 cell
line (μg/mL)
5b
90
100
90
90
90
8a
80
90
80
90
90
8b
80
80
80
80
80
11
100
100
90
100
100
12
80
90
80
90
80
19a
70
80
70
80
80
20a
90
90
90
90
90
20b
70
80
70
80
80
Figure 4
Comparison between the
percentages of viral load reduction of most
potent compounds 5b, 8a, 8b, 11, 12, 19a, 20a, and 20b.
Comparison between the
percentages of viral load reduction of most
potent compounds 5b, 8a, 8b, 11, 12, 19a, 20a, and 20b.
Determination of Coxsackievirus
B4 Titers
Using Plaque Assay
The application of the previously determined
nontoxic dilutions on different doses of the BGMcell lines measured
the initial and final viral titers of Coxsackievirus B4 and, hence,
the mean percentage reduction of viral titers. As shown in Table , it could be revealed
that both compounds 5b and 11 exhibited
the most promising antiviral activities among the tested compounds
with 70% mean percentage reduction of the viral titer compared to
10–23.5% of the rest of the evaluated candidates. These two
compounds underwent further investigations by determining their CC50 and IC50 values, showing very close activity
profiles with 17 and 20 μg/100 μL values for CC50 and 4.5 and 6 μg/100 μL values for IC50 of
compounds 5b and 11, respectively (Table ).
Table 2
Nontoxic Doses of Tested Compounds
on CBV4, HAV HM175, HAdV7, HSV-1, and HCVcc Genotype 4 Cell Lines
nontoxic
dose
compound
no.
CBV4
HAV HM175
HAdV7
HSV-1
HCVcc genotype 4
5b
70
30
20
90
37.7
8a
20
23.5
13.3
30
20
8b
10
10
10
30
30
11
70
30
20
83.3
50
12
23.5
20
10
30
30
19a
10
20
10
20
20
20a
20
20
10
20
20
20b
10
20
10
20
33.3
Table 3
Determination of the Antiviral CC50 and IC50 of Nontoxic Doses of Compounds 5b and 11 against Coxsackievirus B4
compound
no.
mean% reduction
nontoxic
dose (μg/100 μL)
CC50 (μg/100 μL)
IC50 (μg/100 μL)
SI
5b
90
9
17
4.5
3.8
11
83.3
10
20
6
3.3
Determination of HAV
HM175 and Adenovirus
7 Titers Using Plaque Assay
The values of mean percentage
reduction of all the tested compounds against both hepatitis A virus
HM 175 strain and adenovirus 7 did not reflect notable activity. These
values were ranging between 10 and 30 mean percentage reductions against
hepatitis A virus HM 175 strain and between 10 and 20 mean percentage
reductions against adenovirus 7, as shown in Table .
Determination of Herpes
Simplex Virus Type
1 Titers Using Plaque Assay
Furthermore, both compounds 5b and 11 showed the most prominent activity
among all the tested compounds against herpes simplex virus type 1
with mean percentage reduction values of 90 and 83.3%, respectively,
as depicted in Table . For these two most active compounds, CC50, IC50, and SI values were assessed in comparison with acyclovir. The CC50 values of compounds 5b and 11 were
17 and 16 μg/100 μL, respectively, versus 0.28 μg/100
μL for acyclovir. On the other hand, the IC50 values
of 5b and 11 were 6.3 and 6.6 μg/100
μL, respectively, versus 0.07 μg/100 μL for acyclovir,
as shown in Table .
Table 4
Determination of the Antiviral CC50, IC50, and SI of Nontoxic Doses of Compounds 5b and 11 against Herpes Simplex Virus
Despite showing lower potency of both compounds 5b and 11 than acyclovir in the enzyme assay against herpes
simplex polymerase, the combination of 11 with acyclovir
elicited a notable synergistic activity in comparison with acyclovir
alone (Table ). This
finding of potential synergism could recommend a highly effective
combination therapy.
Table 5
HSP Enzyme Assay
% Inhibition and
IC50 Values for Compounds 5b and 11 and Their Combination with Acyclovir
compound
no.
% inhibition
HSP IC50 (μg/mL)
5b
77
9.99
11
81
7.92
acyclovir
84
4.78
5b + acyclovir
84.6
4.34
11 + acyclovir
88
2.64
Antiviral Bioassay of Tested Materials against
ED-43/SG-Feo (VYG) Replicon of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4a
Compound 11 exhibited a moderate antiviral activity
against HCVcc genotype 4 with just 50% mean percentage reduction for
which both CC50 and IC50 values were assessed
as 19 and 10 μg/100 μL, respectively, as tabulated in Table
Table 6
CC50 and IC50 Values of Compound 11 against HCVcc Genotype 4
compound
no.
mean % reduction
nontoxic
dose (μg/100 μL)
CC50 (μg/100 μL)
IC50 μg/100 μL)
SI
11
50%
10
19
10
1.9
Furthermore, both compounds 5b and 11 were evaluated for their DDA (direct-acting antiviral activity)
by measuring enzyme-inhibitory activities against two potential targets
of HCV, namely, NS5B (nonstructural protein 5B) and HCV protease,
in comparison to sofosbuvir. These enzyme assay results were in accordance
to the previously mentioned data with respect to the superiority of
compound 11 over 5b with respect to its
potency and potential efficacy against HCV-RNA genome (Tables and 8).
Table 7
HCV NS5B Enzyme Assay % Inhibition
and IC50 Values for Compounds 5b and 11 and Their Combination with Sofosbuvir
compound
no.
% inhibition
HCV NS5B
IC50 (μg/mL)
5b
52
17.83 ± 1.09
11
83
4.48 ± 0.9
sofosbuvir (sov.)
87
2.06 ± 0.34
5b + sov.
68
7.65 ± 0.72
11 + sov.
90
1.81 ± 0.29
Table 8
HCV Protease Enzyme Assay % Inhibition
and IC50 Values for Compounds 5b and 11 and Their Combination with Sofosbuvir
compound
no.
% inhibition
HCV protease
IC50 (μg/mL)
5b
41
19.54 ± 1.3
11
85
3.18 ± 0.27
5b + sov.
61
8.23 ± 0.61
11 + sov.
91
1.04 ± 0.08
The remarkable synergistic potentiation upon combining compound 11 and sofosbuvir recommends a promising combination therapy
that may lead to a pan-genotypiccombotherapy.
Conclusions
We have achieved the first report of pyridine
and pyrimidine thioglycosidephosphoramidates as sofosbuvir thio-analogues. The structures of the
synthesized compounds were confirmed by the spectral data, and the
thioglycosidic linkage was elucidated by X-ray crystallography. The
compounds were evaluated for their antiviral activities against different
viral cell lines, namely, adenovirus 7, HAV (hepatitis A) HM175, Coxsackievirus
B4, and HSV-1 (herpes simplex virus type 1) in addition to the antiviral
bioassay against ED-43/SG-Feo (VYG) replicon of HCV (hepatitis C virus)
genotype 4a. Compounds 5b and 11 showed
notable antiviral activity against Coxsackievirus B4 and herpes simplex.
Only compound 11 showed a moderate activity against HCV
especially with the synergisticcombination with sofosbuvir that may
lead to a powerful combination therapy. All the tested thioglycosideprotides showed low to moderate activities against the tested viruses;
however, retaining some antiviral potential especially for 8b and 12, which are the prodrugs of 5b and 11, respectively, recommends their prolonged activities and
the expected better pharmacokinetic profile. This may recommend further
investigational pharmacokinetic studies in the combinations of sofosbuvir
with the corresponding phosphoramidate prodrugs 5b and 11.
Experimental Part
All melting points
were measured on a Gallenkamp melting point
apparatus. The 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra were
measured on a Jeol-500 MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 using Si(CH3)4 as an internal standard at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University,
Cairo, Egypt. Elemental analyses were carried out at the Microanalytical
Unit, Faculty of Science, Cairo University. Progress of the reactions
was monitored by TLC using aluminum sheets coated with silica gel
F254 (Merck). Viewing under a short-wavelength UV lamp effected detection.
X-ray data were measured at the Institut fur Anorganische und Analytische
Chemie, Technische Universitat Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Pyridine-2(1H)-thiones 1, 13, and 17 and their corresponding thioglycosides were
prepared following our literature procedures.[39]
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Acetylated
Thioglycosides 3a, 3b, 10, 14a, 14b, 18a, and 18b
To a solution of pyridinethione 1 (0.01 mol)
in dry DMF (20 mL), NaH (15 mmol) was added portion-wise through 15
min and the solution was stirred at room temperature for another 30
min. Then, a solution of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-α-d-gluco (or galacto)pyronosyl bromide was dropped within 30
min and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until
completion (TLC, 3–6 h). After completion, the reaction mixture
was poured on ice water to remove the potassium bromide formed. The
product was filtered off, dried, and crystallized from ethanol.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Unprotected
Pyridine Thioglycosides 5a, 5b, and 11 and Pyrimidine Thioglycosides 15a, 15b, 19a, and 19b
Dry gaseous ammonia
was passed through a solution of protected glycosides 3a, 3b, 10, 14a, 14b, 18a, or 18b in dry methanol (20 mL) at
0 °C for 10 min. Then, the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for
2 to 6 h. The mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure at 60
°C to give a solid residue, which was crystallized from ethanol.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Pyrimidine/Pyridine
Phosphoramidate Nucleotides
A flame-dried flask kept under
a nitrogen atmosphere was loaded with the unprotected pyridine thioglycosides 5a, 5b, and 11 or pyrimidine thioglycosides 15a, 15b, 19a, and 19b (1 molar ratio) at 25 °CTHF, the formed suspension was allowed
to stir and cool down to −5 °C, and then iPrMgCl (1.88
M in THF) was added in a dropwise manner through a dropping funnel
without exceeding 0 °C for a period of 1 h. At the end of the
addition, bring the temperature to 15–18 °C in about 30
min and keep the reaction mixture under these conditions for 30 min.
Cool down to 0–5 °C and, in the meantime, prepare solution
of 7 in THF by adding solution 7 to the
main reaction mixture through a dropping funnel without exceeding
5 °C in a period of 1–2 h. At the end of dropping, wash
the dropping funnel with THF and keep the reaction mixture under stirring
at 0–5 °C for about 18–22 h, as monitored in TLC.
When the reaction is over, add to the reaction mixture at 0–5
°C a solution of ammonium chloride, leave the reaction temperature
to increase to about 10 °C, and then add a few drops of HCl.
Bring the mixture to 25 °C, separate the phases, separate the
upper THF organic layer, distill it out under vacuum, then add it
to the residue DCM, wash it six times with 2% sodium carbonate, and
then wash it with 0.5 NHCl and with brine. Filter the organic layer
on Celite/charcoal pad and wash the filter with DCM, distill it out
under vacuum, and crystallize the residue from the appropriate solvent.
It was done according
to Simões et al.,[40] where samples
(50 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO. Decontamination of samples
was done by adding 24 μL of 100× of the antibiotic–antimycotic
mixture to 1 ML of each sample. Afterward, bifold dilutions were carried
out to 100 μL of original dissolved samples and 100 μL
of each dilutions was inoculated in Hep-2, Vero, BGM, FRHK4, and Huh
7.5 cell lines (obtained from the Holding Company for Biological Products
& Vaccines VACSERA, Egypt) previously cultured in 96-multiwell
plates (Greiner Bio-One, Germany) to estimate the nontoxic dose of
the tested samples. Cytotoxicity assay was done through cell morphology
evaluation using an inverted light microscope and cell viability test
applying the trypan blue dye exclusion method.
Cell Morphology Evaluation by Inverted Light
Microscopy
Hep-2, Vero, BGM, FRHK4, and Huh 7.5cell cultures
(2 × 105 cells/mL) were prepared separately in 96-well
tissue culture plates (Greiner Bio-One, Germany). After 24 h incubation
at 37 °C in a humidified 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere,
cell monolayers were confluent, and the medium was removed from each
well and replenished with 100 μL of bifold dilutions of different
samples tested prepared in DMEM (GIBCO BRL). For cell controls, 100
μL of DMEM without samples was added. All cultures were incubated
at 37 °C in a humidified 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere for
72 h. Cell morphology was observed daily for microscopically detectable
morphological alterations, such as loss of confluence, cell rounding
and shrinking, and cytoplasm granulation and vacuolization. Morphological
changes were scored (Simões et al.[40]).
Cell Viability Assay
It was done
through the trypan blue dye exclusion method (Walum et al.).[41] Hep-2, Vero, BGM, FRHK4, and Huh 7.5cell cultures
(2 × 105 cells/mL) were grown in 12-well tissue culture
plates (Greiner Bio-One, Germany). After 24 h incubation, the same
assay described above for tested samples cytotoxicity was followed
by applying 100 μL of tested samples dilutions (bifold dilutions)
per well. After 72 h, the medium was removed, cells were trypsinized,
and an equal volume of 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue dye aqueous solution
was added to the cell suspension. Viable cells were counted under
the phase contrast microscope.
Determination
of Adenovirus 7, HAV HM175,
Coxsackievirus B4, and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Titers Using Plaque
Assay
Nontoxic dilutions were mixed (100 μL) with 100
μL of different doses of adenovirus 7, HAV HM175, Coxsackievirus
B4, and herpes simplex virus type 1 (1 × 105, 1 ×
106, and 1 × 107). The mixture was further
incubated for half an hour at 37 °C. The inoculation of (100
μL) 10-fold dilutions of treated and untreated adenovirus 7,
HAV HM175, Coxsackievirus B4, and herpes simplex virus type 1 was
carried out separately into Hep-2, FRHK4, BGM, and Vero cell lines,
respectively, in 12-multiwell plates. After 1 h of incubation for
adsorption at 37 °C in a 5% CO2-water vapor atmosphere
without constant shaking, the plates were shaken intermittently to
keep the cells from drying. After adsorption, 1 mL of 2× media
(Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), Gibco-BRL) plus 1
mL of 1% agarose was added to each well, and the plates were incubated
at 37 °C in a 5% CO2-water vapor atmosphere. After
the appropriate incubation period, the cells were stained with 0.4%
crystal violet after formalin fixation, and the number of plaques
was counted. The viral titers were then calculated and expressed as
plaque-forming units per milliliter (pfu/mL) (Schmidtke et al.).[42] CC50 and IC50 were done
for the promising materials (viral reduction of 50% or more). The
50% cytotoxicconcentration (CC50) of the test extract
was defined as the concentration that reduces the OD492 of treated
uninfectedcells to 50% of that of untreated uninfectedcells. IC50 is the concentration at which the compound plaque reduction
rate reaches halfway between the baseline and maximum.ED-43/SG-Feo (VYG) replicon of HCV genotype 4a was treated with the
nontoxic dose of the tested materials. HCV RNA was quantified in algal
extract-treated Huh 7.5-infectedcells using qRT-PCR (Taqman probe
kit, Qiagen) and according to the manufacturer’s instructions
to show a dose-dependent decrease in subgenomic RNA copies according
to Saeed et al.[43]
Authors: G B Elion; P A Furman; J A Fyfe; P de Miranda; L Beauchamp; H J Schaeffer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1977-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mohsan Saeed; Troels K H Scheel; Judith M Gottwein; Svetlana Marukian; Lynn B Dustin; Jens Bukh; Charles M Rice Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michal Sála; Armando M De Palma; Hubert Hrebabecký; Radim Nencka; Martin Dracínský; Pieter Leyssen; Johan Neyts; Antonín Holý Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Alessandro K Jordão; Vitor F Ferreira; Thiago M L Souza; Gabrielle G de Souza Faria; Viviane Machado; Juliana L Abrantes; Maria C B V de Souza; Anna C Cunha Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Christopher McGuigan; Karolina Madela; Mohamed Aljarah; Arnaud Gilles; Andrea Brancale; Nicola Zonta; Stanley Chamberlain; John Vernachio; Jeff Hutchins; Andrea Hall; Brenda Ames; Elena Gorovits; Babita Ganguly; Alexander Kolykhalov; Jin Wang; Jerry Muhammad; Joseph M Patti; Geoffrey Henson Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2010-06-20 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Victor P Krasnov; Vera V Musiyak; Galina L Levit; Dmitry A Gruzdev; Valeriya L Andronova; Georgii A Galegov; Iana R Orshanskaya; Ekaterina O Sinegubova; Vladimir V Zarubaev; Valery N Charushin Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.927