Magnolia Muk-Lan Lee1, Brandon Dow Chan1, Wing-Yan Wong1, Tsz-Wing Leung1, Zhao Qu2, Junrong Huang3, Lizhi Zhu3, Chi-Sing Lee4, Sibao Chen2,1,5, William Chi-Shing Tai2,1. 1. Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine and Molecular Pharmacology (Incubation), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China. 3. Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen 518035, China. 4. Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. 5. Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China.
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, responsible for an estimated 9.6 million deaths in 2018, and this burden continues to increase. Therefore, there is a clear and urgent need for novel drugs with increased efficacy for the treatment of different cancers. Previous research has demonstrated that brevilin A (BA) exerts anticancer activity in various cancers, including human multiple myeloma, breast cancer, lung cancer, and colon carcinoma, suggesting the anticancer potential present in the chemical scaffold of BA. Here, we designed and synthesized a small library of 12 novel BA derivatives and evaluated the biological anticancer effects of the compounds in various cancer cell lines. The results of this structure-activity relationship study demonstrated that BA derivatives BA-9 and BA-10 possessed significantly improved anticancer activity toward lung, colon, and breast cancer cell lines. BA-9 and BA-10 could more effectively reduce cancer cell viability and induce DNA damage, cell-cycle arrest, and apoptosis when compared with BA. Our findings represent a significant step forward in the development of novel anticancer entities.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, responsible for an estimated 9.6 million deaths in 2018, and this burden continues to increase. Therefore, there is a clear and urgent need for novel drugs with increased efficacy for the treatment of different cancers. Previous research has demonstrated that brevilin A (BA) exerts anticancer activity in various cancers, including humanmultiple myeloma, breast cancer, lung cancer, and colon carcinoma, suggesting the anticancer potential present in the chemical scaffold of BA. Here, we designed and synthesized a small library of 12 novel BA derivatives and evaluated the biological anticancer effects of the compounds in various cancer cell lines. The results of this structure-activity relationship study demonstrated that BA derivatives BA-9 and BA-10 possessed significantly improved anticancer activity toward lung, colon, and breast cancer cell lines. BA-9 and BA-10 could more effectively reduce cancer cell viability and induce DNA damage, cell-cycle arrest, and apoptosis when compared with BA. Our findings represent a significant step forward in the development of novel anticancer entities.
According
to the World Health Organization, cancer ranks second
in global causes of death, with an estimated 9.6 million deaths attributed
to this group of diseases in 2018. In males and females combined,
lung cancer is the cancer with the highest rate of incidence (11.6%
of total cases), followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), and colorectal
cancer (10.2%). These three cancers also rank among the top five in
terms of cancer mortality (lung, 18.4%; breast, 6.6%; colorectal,
9.2% of all cancer deaths). Due to circumstances including global
population growth, an aging populace, and advances in social and economic
development, cancer cases and deaths are on the rise, and cancer is
set to soon overtake cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of
death worldwide.[1]Currently, the
most commonly employed cancer treatments include
surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, while targeted therapies
and immunotherapies are receiving increasing attention. Accordingly,
chemotherapeutic drugs, biologics, and immune-mediated therapies are
major focuses in current efforts to treat cancer.[2] In the clinical situation, many cancerpatients exhibit
a poor response to conventional chemotherapy due to the development
of resistance.[3] With the poor efficacy
and considerable toxicity of many current chemotherapeutics, there
is a clear and urgent need for novel, effective, and nontoxic (NT)
drugs for the treatment of cancer.Sesquiterpene lactones are
natural bioactive compounds that are
often used to treat cancer and inflammation in traditional Chinese
medicine.[4,5] In recent years, researchers have conducted
studies to investigate the anticancer mechanism of sesquiterpene lactones
in various cancers.[4,6−8] Based on the
structures of several sesquiterpene lactones with anticancer activity,
a number of compounds with increased potency have been either isolated
from natural products or partially synthesized. Several potential
anticancer agents have emerged from this group of lead compounds and
undergone further extensive investigation. Among these are brevilin
A (BA), a sesquiterpene lactone that has been widely
studied due to its potent bioactivities, including cancer cell cytotoxicity
and antineoplastic efficacy in in vivo studies.[7,9−16]BA has been identified as one of the active compounds
in Centipeda minima, a traditional
Chinese herb that is frequently used for relieving stuffy nose, asthma,
and cough.[17] Pharmacological studies have
demonstrated that extracts from C. minima possess various bioactivities including antibacterial,[18] antiallergic,[19] antitumor,[20] and anti-inflammatory effects.[21,22] Previous research revealed that BA could effectively
reduce the growth of CT26tumor cells via induction of apoptosis and
promotion of autophagy through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling.[15] In addition, in HL60 cells, BA could
induce an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), a decrease in
mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), activation of caspase 3/7,
as well as induce cell apoptosis via inhibition of nuclear factor
(NF)-κB activation.[16] Additional
studies showed that BA could inhibit both STAT3 and JAK
signaling[11] and could also cause the dissociation
and degradation of Skp2 by binding to Skp1 in A549lung cancer cells,
resulting in G2/M phase arrest.[12] These
findings support the development of BA as a novel anticancer
drug and as a chemical scaffold or lead compound for the design and
synthesis of new anticancer compounds.The present study focuses
on the anticancer potential of BA and its derivatives.
Our study has demonstrated advances
in the development of brevilin-type sesquiterpene lactones (BA and its derivatives BA-9 and BA-10) as potential anticancer agents, including their structural characterization,
synthesis and synthetic modification, and antitumor potential, with
the mechanism of action and structure–activity relationships
(SARs) also being investigated. Results from our study can stimulate
further interest in developing sesquiterpene lactones and their derivatives
as novel anticancer agents.
Results and Discussion
BA analogues
were prepared by direct derivatization of BA. As shown
in Scheme , reduction
of BA using sodium borohydride resulted
in selective 1,4-reduction of the enone in the A ring and gave BA-1 at a 92% yield. Subsequent α-hydroxylation of the
ketone in the A ring using trimethylsilyl triflate and triethylamine
followed by oxidation with magnesium monoperoxyphthalate (MMPP) provided BA-2, which was further oxidized to afford BA-4 in good yields. Luche reduction of BA followed by acetylation
gave BA-3. The Morita–Baylis–Hillman reaction
of BA using imidazole and paraformaldehyde afforded BA-5, and acetylation of the newly installed C11-hydroxylmethyl
provided BA-6. Aldol reaction between BA and paraformaldehyde in the presence of sodium carbonate provided BA-8 at a 70% yield along with 10% of a side-product, which
was identified as BA-7 (C1-epimer of BA)
after careful analysis of the NMR data. With BA-8 prepared,
the C11-hydroxylmethyl was acetylated with p-nitrobenzoyl
chloride, methacrylic anhydride, acetic anhydride, and succinic anhydride
to afford BA-9–12, respectively (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of BA-1–8
Scheme 2
Synthesis of BA-9–12
Research has demonstrated that BA exerts
anticancer
effects in various cancer types, including humanmultiple myeloma,
breast, lung, and colon.[7,9−16] To examine and compare the anticancer activities of BA and its derivatives, the cytotoxicities of the compounds were assessed
by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(MTT) assay in four cancer cell lines, A549 (lung cancer), SW480 (colorectal
cancer), MDA-MB-231 (triple negative breast cancer), and MCF-7 (estrogen
receptor-positive breast cancer). Table and Figure S1 show the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)
values and dose–response curves of BA and its
derivatives.
Table 1
Effect of BA Compounds on Viability
of a Panel of Cancer Cell Linesa
compound
name
A549 (μM)
SW480 (μM)
MDA-MB-231
(μM)
MCF-7 (μM)
BA
10.086
13.631
7.033
12.500
BA-1
NT
NT
>50
>50
BA-2
NT
NT
NT
NT
BA-3
NT
NT
NT
NT
BA-4
NT
NT
NT
NT
BA-5
NT
NT
NT
NT
BA-6
>50
15.418
12.037
27.101
BA-7
22.899
>50
27.750
>50
BA-8
13.722
26.395
20.700
>50
BA-9
6.239
5.147
4.647
5.847
BA-10
6.392
8.566
6.385
6.352
BA-11
15.050
49.955
21.010
>50
BA-12
NT
NT
NT
NT
A549, SW480,
MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7
cells were treated with various doses of BA and its derivatives for
48 h. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay. Results are expressed
as IC50 values in micromolar. NT, nontoxic at the highest
tested dose.
A549, SW480,
MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7
cells were treated with various doses of BA and its derivatives for
48 h. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay. Results are expressed
as IC50 values in micromolar. NT, nontoxic at the highest
tested dose.In the structure–activity
relationship (SAR) study, the
effects of modification of the A and C rings were examined by two
series of BA derivatives. These BA analogues were prepared by direct
derivatization of the isolated natural BA. BA analogue
series 1 contains derivatives with A ring modifications (Figure ). When the alkene
or carbonyl of the enone in the A ring was reduced (BA-1–3), the in vitro cytotoxicity was lost completely.
Introducing a hydroxyl or hydroxylmethyl to the α-position of
the enone in the A ring (BA-4 and BA-5)
also led to complete loss of activity. Acetylated derivative BA-6 exhibited poor-to-moderate cytotoxicity in different
cancer cell lines. Moreover, the cis-AB ring junction
derivative BA-7 exhibited lower activity than BA in most of the tested cell lines. In general, the BA derivatives
in series 1 did not exhibit improved cytotoxicity in the four cancer
cell lines when compared to BA. These results indicated
that the enone in the A ring is essential for cytotoxicity, and functional
group modification of the A ring could generally lead to significant
loss of anticancer activity.
Figure 1
BA analogue series. (A) Series 1: derivatives
with A ring modifications;
(B) series 2: derivatives with C ring modifications.
BA analogue series. (A) Series 1: derivatives
with A ring modifications;
(B) series 2: derivatives with C ring modifications.On the other hand, several derivatives in BA analogue series
2
(BA-8–12, prepared by introducing
different substituents to the α-position of the γ-lactone
D ring) exhibited a significantly enhanced cytotoxicity in the tested
cancer cell lines. Most notably, in all tested cell lines, compounds BA-9 and BA-10 showed lower IC50 values
than their parental compound, BA. In the MCF-7, SW480,
and A549 cell lines, the IC50 values of BA-9 and BA-10 were almost half of that of BA: the IC50 values of BA in MDA-MB-231, MCF-7,
SW480, and A549 were 7.033, 12.5, 13.631, and 10.086 μM, respectively,
while the IC50 values of BA-9 and BA-10 were, respectively, 4.647 and 6.385 μM in MDA-MB-231, 5.847
and 6.352 μM in MCF-7, 5.147 and 8.566 μM in SW480, and
6.239 and 6.392 μM in A549. These results indicated that BA-9 and BA-10 exhibited potential anticancer
efficacy, which, importantly, may be improved compared to BA.To further confirm the anticancer efficacies of BA-9 and BA-10, we employed the clonogenic assay to determine
the effect of the derivatives on the survival and proliferation of
cancer cells. As demonstrated in our results (Figure ), BA-9 and BA-10 could efficiently suppress cancer cell growth in all tested cancer
cell lines, with results comparable to BA. Derivatives BA-9 and BA-10 could completely inhibit cancer
cell colony formation from doses as low as 5 μM in A549, 2.5
μM in SW480, 4 μM in MDA-MB-231, and 2.5 μM in MCF-7.
These results further confirmed the anticancer effects of BA-9 and BA-10.
Figure 2
Effect of BA compounds on colony formation in
a panel of cancer
cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231, and (D) MCF-7 cells
were treated with the indicated doses of BA, BA-10, and BA-9 for 14 days. At the end of the experiment,
cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 4 h and stained with
2% Giemsa blue solution overnight. Stained cells were briefly rinsed
in Milli-Q water and then imaged.
Effect of BA compounds on colony formation in
a panel of cancer
cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231, and (D) MCF-7 cells
were treated with the indicated doses of BA, BA-10, and BA-9 for 14 days. At the end of the experiment,
cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 4 h and stained with
2% Giemsa blue solution overnight. Stained cells were briefly rinsed
in Milli-Q water and then imaged.As previous studies have reported that BA could induce
cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer,[12,15,16,23] we next investigated
whether BA-9 or BA-10 could exhibit improved
abilities for cell-cycle arrest or induction of apoptosis. A549, SW480,
MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cells were treated with various concentrations
of BA, BA-9, or BA-10 and then
assessed via propidium iodide (PI)/RNase staining for cell-cycle analysis
and annexin V–phycoerythrin (PE)/7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD)
staining for apoptosis analysis. As shown in Figure , BA could induce G2/M arrest
in SW480, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, BA-9 and BA-10 not only induced G2/M arrest but
did so with a greater effect when compared to their parental compound
(BA). BA-10 showed the most potent induction
of cell-cycle arrest in all tested cancer cell lines.
Figure 3
Effect of BA compounds
on cell-cycle arrest in a panel of cancer cell lines. (A) A549, (B)
SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231,
and (D) MCF-7 cells were treated with the indicated doses of BA, BA-10, and BA-9 for 24 h.
Effect of BA compounds
on cell-cycle arrest in a panel of cancer cell lines. (A) A549, (B)
SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231,
and (D) MCF-7 cells were treated with the indicated doses of BA, BA-10, and BA-9 for 24 h.We also examined in depth the effect of the compounds
on induction
of apoptosis. Our results showed that BA, BA-9, and BA-10 could all significantly and dose-dependently
increase the proportion of apoptotic (annexin V-positive) cells in
the treated cancer cell lines (Figure ). Notably, BA-9 and BA-10 demonstrated much greater induction of apoptosis than their parental
compound, BA. Of the three compounds, BA-9 was the most potent in terms of induction of apoptotic cell death,
with the proportion of apoptotic cells reaching 58.0, 37.9, 43.7,
and 31.1% in A549, SW480, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cell lines, respectively.
Figure 4
Effect
of BA compounds on apoptosis induction in a panel of cancer
cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231, and (D) MCF-7 cells
were treated with the indicated concentrations of BA, BA-10, or BA-9 for 48 h and subjected to the
Annexin V–PE/7-AAD staining assay. **P <
0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to the control.
Effect
of BA compounds on apoptosis induction in a panel of cancer
cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231, and (D) MCF-7 cells
were treated with the indicated concentrations of BA, BA-10, or BA-9 for 48 h and subjected to the
Annexin V–PE/7-AAD staining assay. **P <
0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to the control.Studies show that unrepaired DNA damage can be
toxic and promote
cell elimination pathways such as apoptotic death, thus functioning
as a tumor-suppressive pathway.[24,25] Therefore, we conducted
Western blot analysis to investigate protein expressions of the major
apoptotic markers cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and cleaved
caspase 3 and an important DNA damage marker, pH2A.X. H2AX is very
sensitive to DNA damage and is involved in its detection and the early
cellular response by undergoing phosphorylation and recruiting DNA
repair proteins to the site of damage. As shown in Figure , BA, BA-9, and BA-10 could upregulate the expression of cleaved
caspase 3 and cleaved PARP while downregulating their total form in
lung, colon, and breast cancer cell lines. Importantly, BA-9 and BA-10 greatly and dose-dependently enhanced the
expression of pH2A.X in the tested cancer cell lines when compared
to BA, indicating that BA-9 and BA-10 were more effective in induction of DNA damage and cancer cell death.
Figure 5
Effect
of BA compounds on apoptosis induction and DNA damage in
a panel of cancer cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231,
and (D) MCF-7 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations
of BA, BA-10, or BA-9 for 48
h. The protein levels of apoptotic markers, cleaved caspase 3, caspase
3, cleaved PARP, and PARP and DNA damage marker pH2A.X were detected
by Western blotting. β-Actin was used as an internal loading
control. Representative immunoblots are shown.
Effect
of BA compounds on apoptosis induction and DNA damage in
a panel of cancer cell lines. (A) A549, (B) SW480, (C) MDA-MB-231,
and (D) MCF-7 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations
of BA, BA-10, or BA-9 for 48
h. The protein levels of apoptotic markers, cleaved caspase 3, caspase
3, cleaved PARP, and PARP and DNA damage marker pH2A.X were detected
by Western blotting. β-Actin was used as an internal loading
control. Representative immunoblots are shown.
Conclusions
In this study, we reported the design, synthesis, and biological
evaluation of BA and 12 derivatives. In in vitro analyses,
we examined the anticancer activity of the compounds in a panel of
cancer cell lines. Notably, we identified two BA derivatives, BA-9 and BA-10, that exerted greater anticancer
activity than their parental compound, BA. We further
demonstrated that these two derivatives could significantly and dose-dependently
reduce cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and DNA damage in different
cancer types and cell lines.Altogether, we present strong evidence
of the potent anticancer
activities of BA-9 and BA-10. Based on our
findings, BA-9 and BA-10 are promising candidates
for further development as therapeutics with high efficacy against
multiple cancer types.
Experimental Section
Isolation of Brevilin A
The isolation of BA has been reported in our previous
studies.[26] In brief, the ethanolic extract
of C. minima (CME) was resolved in
water and then partitioned with ethyl acetate.
The ethyl acetate extract was subjected to column chromatography on
silica gel with chloroform–methanol (1:0, 50:1, 20:1, 10:1,
0:1, v/v) for gradient elution to obtain five fractions A–E.
Fraction G was separated by continuous column chromatography using
silica gel, pre-high-performance liquid chromatography (pre-HPLC),
and Sephadex LH-20, sequentially.
General Information for
Synthesis of New Compounds
All air- and water-sensitive reactions
were carried out under a nitrogen
atmosphere with dry solvents under anhydrous conditions, unless otherwise
noted. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC)
carried out on 0.25 mm silica gel plates (60F-254) that were analyzed
by UV irradiation (254 nm) and by staining with either KMnO4 (200 mL of H2O, 1.5 g of KMnO4, 10 g of K2CO3, and 1.25 mL of 10% aqueous NaOH) or anisaldehyde
(450 mL of 95% EtOH, 25 mL of conc. H2SO4, 15
mL of acetic acid, and 25 mL of anisaldehyde). Silica gel (60, particle
size 0.040–0.063 mm) was used for flash column chromatography.
All chemicals were purchased commercially and used without further
purification. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from sodium and
benzophenone, and CH2Cl2 was distilled from
calcium hydride. Yields refer to the isolated yields after silica
gel flash column chromatography, unless otherwise stated. NMR spectra
were recorded on a 300 MHz (1H, 300 MHz; 13C,
75 MHz), 400 MHz (1H, 400 MHz; 13C, 100 MHz),
or 500 MHz (1H, 500 MHz; 13C, 125 MHz) spectrometer.
The following abbreviations were used to explain the multiplicities:
s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; and
br, broad. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained from
a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF)
mass spectrometer. Melting points were uncorrected and determined
on a micromelting point meter. Purity was assessed via HPLC analysis,
and all derivatives were shown to have a purity ≥95% (see the Supporting Information).
Synthesis of BA-1
To a stirred solution of brevilin A (2.2 g, 6.4 mmol) in
methanol (300 mL) was
added NaBH4 (270 mg, 6.9 mmol) in three portions at 0 °C.
After stirring at 0 °C for 2 h, the reaction was quenched by
addition of saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution (30 mL).
The aqueous phase was concentrated under reduced pressure and extracted
with ethyl acetate (200 mL × 3). The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 8:1) of the residue gave a white solid powder (2.02 g, 5.89
mmol, 92%) as the product. BA-1: 1H NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.07 (dd, J = 7.5,
1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 4.75 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H),
3.05–3.09 (m, 1H), 2.87 (dd, J = 10.0, 6.5
Hz, 1H), 2.46 (dd, J = 19.0, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (dq, J = 15.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.24–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.05–2.15
(m, 4H), 1.99 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.81 (s,
3H), 1.70 (dd, J = 14.5, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 1.56–1.57
(m, 1H), 1.54 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 217.56, 179.20, 166.19,
139.23, 127.25, 79.55, 72.47, 53.74, 48.35, 47.92, 40.20, 38.89, 35.26,
27.14, 22.46, 20.69, 20.39, 15.81, 12.09, 10.54; HRMS (electrospray
ionization (ESI)/[M + H]+) calcd for C20H29O5: 349.2015, found 349.2018.
Synthesis
of BA-2
To a stirred solution
of BA-1 (400 mg, 1.15 mmol) and triethylamine (2.95 mL,
8.60 mmol) in dichloromethane (30 mL) was added TBSOTf (0.93 mL, 4
mmol) slowly at 0 °C. After stirring at room temperature for
3 h, the reaction was quenched by addition of water (15 mL) and the
aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane (15 mL × 3).
The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography
(hexane/ethyl acetate = 30:1) of the residue gave a colorless oil
as the crude product. To a stirred solution of the above crude product
in dichloromethane (10 mL) was added meta-chloroperoxybenzoic
acid (m-CPBA) (297 mg, 1.29 mmol, 75%) slowly at
0 °C. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C until TLC showed
completion of the reaction. The reaction was then quenched by addition
of a saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution, and the aqueous
phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 3). The combined
organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography
(hexane/ethyl acetate = 30:1) of the residue gave a colorless oil
(340 mg, 1 mmol, 83%) as the product. BA-2: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.07 (dddd, J = 8.8, 7.3, 5.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (s, 1H), 4.72 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (dt, J = 10.1, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (dd, J = 10.2,
6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (ddd, J = 12.8, 11.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H),
2.46 (s, 1H), 2.32 (ddd, J = 15.2, 6.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H),
2.13–2.02 (m, 1H), 2.02–1.99 (m, 1H), 1.98 (ddd, J = 4.6, 3.5, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.87 (ddd, J = 14.1, 12.8, 7.9 Hz, 2H), 1.79 (p, J = 1.6 Hz,
3H), 1.69 (ddd, J = 15.3, 11.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 1.47
(d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J =
6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) δ 216.1, 179.2, 166.2, 139.8, 127.2,
79.4, 71.4, 69.6, 53.9, 48.0, 45.3, 40.1, 38.6, 31.3, 27.1, 20.6,
20.2, 15.8, 12.3, 10.5. HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C20H29O6: 365.1959, found 365.1956.
Synthesis of BA-3
To a stirred solution
of brevilin A (2.20 g, 6.4 mmol) and CeCl3·7H2O (1.19 g, 3.2 mmol) in methanol (300 mL) was added NaBH4 (270 mg, 6.9 mmol) in three portions at 0 °C. After
stirring at 0 °C for 2 h, the reaction was quenched by addition
of saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution (30 mL). The aqueous
phase was concentrated under reduced pressure to remove methane and
extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL × 3). The combined organic
extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered,
and concentrated. To a stirred solution of the residue in dichloromethane
(200 mL) and triethylamine (6.26 mL, 45 mmol) was added acetic anhydride
(1.42 mL, 15 mmol) followed by 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (83.5
mg, 0.69 mmol) at room temperature. The reaction was stirred at room
temperature until TLC showed completion of the reaction. The reaction
was then quenched by addition of a saturated NH4Cl aqueous
solution (50 mL), and the aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate
(200 mL × 3). The combined organic extracts were washed with
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica
gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 10:1) of the
residue gave a white solid powder (1.30 g, 3.33 mmol, 52% for two
steps) as the product. BA-3: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 6.19 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.5
Hz, 1H), 5.94 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.60–5.63 (m, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H),
4.78 (dd, J = 7.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.05–3.09
(m, 1H), 2.97–3.00 (m, 1H), 2.77 (dd, J =
11.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.31–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.11–2.20 (m,
1H), 2.05–2.10 (m, 6H), 1.96 (s, 3H), 1.67–1.72 (m,
1H), 1.47 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.14 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.04 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) δ 179.13, 170.78, 166.56, 139.51, 133.41,
128.80, 127.49, 81.85, 79.25, 72.36, 54.58, 54.34, 47.98, 40.03, 39.34,
26.37, 20.88, 20.83, 20.74, 15.90, 12.28, 10.67; HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C22H31O6: 391.2121,
found 391.2130.
Synthesis of BA-4
To
a stirred solution
of BA-2 (340 mg, 1 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was
added Dess–Martin periodinane (590 mg, 1.3 mmol) at 0 °C.
After stirring at room temperature for 30 min, the mixture was filtered
through a plug of silica gel and concentrated. Silica gel flash column
chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4:1) of the residue gave a
yellow oil (312 mg, 0.86 mmol, 86%) as the product. BA-4: 1H NMR (500 MHz, pyridine-d5) δ 6.69 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.96–5.85
(m, 2H), 4.86 (td, J = 6.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.35 (dq, J = 10.2, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (dd, J = 10.9,
2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (dd, J = 10.3, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.40
(ddd, J = 15.3, 6.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.17–2.00
(m, 1H), 1.96 (dq, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.77 (p, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.74–1.52 (m, 5H), 1.27 (s, 3H),
1.05 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, pyridine-d5) δ
206.9, 180.2, 167.5, 153.7, 139.6, 129.1, 128.9, 80.8, 73.6, 54.9,
50.4, 49.6, 42.2, 41.5, 27.7, 21.5, 20.7, 19.3, 16.7, 12.3; HRMS (ESI/[M
+ H]+) calcd for C20H27O6: 363.1802, found 363.1805.
Synthesis of BA-5
To a stirred solution
of brevilin A (2.0 g, 5.8 mmol) in THF (100 mL) and saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution (100 mL) were added imidazole (790 mg, 11.6
mmol) and formaldehyde (525 mg, 174 mmol) at room temperature. After
stirring for 6 h, the reaction was quenched by addition of saturated
NaCl (50 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (250
mL × 3). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine,
dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica gel
flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4:1) of the residue
gave a white solid powder (959 mg, 2.55 mmol, 44%) as the product. BA-5: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
7.51 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.05–6.08 (m, 1H),
5.51 (s, 1H), 4.79 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (dd, J = 21.0, 14.5 Hz, 2H), 3.10–3.15 (m, 1H), 3.04 (dd, J = 11.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.94–2.97 (m, 1H), 2.48–2.52
(m, 2H), 2.20–2.23 (m, 1H), 1.91 (d, J = 7.5
Hz, 3H), 1.75 (s, 3H), 1.66–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.56 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.91, 179.14, 166.37,
155.63, 140.37, 139.02, 127.25, 79.53, 71.86, 57.46, 55.75, 52.76,
48.90, 40.96, 40.46, 25.86, 20.46, 19.75, 17.57, 15.68, 10.97; HRMS
(ESI/[M + Na]+) calcd for C21H28O6Na: 399.1784, found 399.1783.
Synthesis of BA-6
To a stirred solution
of BA-5 (600 mg, 1.60 mmol) and triethylamine (2 mL,
15 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was added acetic anhydride (0.30
mL, 3.20 mmol) followed by DMAP (19.4 mg, 0.16 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction was stirred at room temperature until TLC showed completion
of the reaction. The reaction was then quenched by addition of a saturated
NH4Cl aqueous solution (10 mL), and the aqueous phase was
extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic
extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered,
and concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 10:1) of the residue gave a white solid powder (656 mg,
1.58 mmol, 99%) as the product. BA-6: 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (s, 1H), 6.04 (qd, J = 8.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 4.70–4.78 (m,
2H), 2.90–3.18 (m, 3H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 15.3,
5.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.18–2.23 (m, 1H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 1.89 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.04 (s,
3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 207.01,
178.88, 170.42, 166.15, 157.81, 138.99, 136.20, 127.04, 79.26, 71.75,
57.68, 55.40, 52.68, 48.63, 40.78, 40.30, 25.61, 20.64, 20.31, 19.62,
17.28, 15.54, 10.82; HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C23H31O7: 419.2070, found 419.2071.
Synthesis of BA-7 and BA-8
To
a stirred solution of brevilin A (105 mg, 0.3 mmol) in THF (5
mL) and saturated Na2CO3 aqueous solution (5
mL) was added formaldehyde (10 mg, 0.33 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction was heated to 55 °C and stirring for 36 h. After
consumption of the starting material, the reaction was quenched by
addition of saturated NaCl (10 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted
with ethyl acetate (10 mL × 3). The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 2:1) of the residue gave white solid powders BA-7 (11 mg, 0.03 mmol, 10%) and BA-8 (79 mg, 0.21 mmol,
70%). BA-7: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (m, 1H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 4.90 (ddd, J = 12.6, 6.4, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (dt, J = 12.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (dt, J = 13.6, 6.8 Hz,
1H), 2.56 (dd, J = 13.3, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 15.1, 12.6, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 2.02 (dt, J = 13.5, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.96–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.85–1.80
(m, 1H), 1.74–1.66 (m, 3H), 1.50 (d, J = 6.9
Hz, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.1, 177.2, 165.8, 162.3, 139.0,
130.5, 127.3, 77.3, 77.0, 76.7, 76.2, 72.0, 54.7, 52.6, 51.8, 37.2,
35.9, 29.7, 26.7, 20.7, 20.3, 18.1, 15.6, 13.7; HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C20H27O5: 347.1853,
found 347.1859. BA-8: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (dd, J = 5.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H),
6.09 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.02–6.08
(m, 1H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 4.95–4.99 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 2H), 3.19
(s, 1H), 3.12 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.36–2.43 (m, 1H), 2.00–2.08
(m, 1H), 1.82–1.89 (m, 1H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 1.28
(d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.69, 179.00, 167.04, 162.25,
140.29, 130.40, 126.98, 77.34, 73.43, 67.84, 54.57, 52.42, 49.68,
38.29, 26.40, 20.20, 20.06, 19.06, 15.78; HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C21H29O6: 377.1959, found 377.1965.
Synthesis
of BA-9
To a stirred solution
of BA-8 (600 mg, 1.60 mmol) and triethylamine (2 mL,
15 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was added p-nitrobenzoyl
chloride (594 mg, 3.20 mmol) followed by DMAP (19.4 mg, 0.16 mmol)
at room temperature. The reaction was stirred at room temperature
for 2 days. After the reaction was completed, the solution was quenched
by addition of a saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (10 mL)
and the aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL ×
3). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica gel flash column
chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4:1) of the residue gave a
faint-yellow amorphous solid (765 mg, 1.46 mmol, 91%) as the product. BA-9: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
8.27 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.21 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H),
6.11 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.94–5.98
(m, 1H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 5.06–5.10 (m, 1H), 4.54 (s, 2H), 3.19
(s, 1H), 3.01–3.04 (m, 2H), 2.51 (dq, J =
15.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.16–2.19 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.84 (m,
1H), 1.71 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.65 (s, 3H), 1.62
(s, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
209.12, 177.30, 165.93, 164.07, 161.70, 150.74, 139.41, 134.93, 130.89,
130.10, 126.94, 123.48, 77.60, 72.72, 68.10, 54.81, 53.46, 50.37,
39.64, 29.63, 26.14, 20.18, 19.79, 18.81, 18.40, 15.45; HRMS (ESI/[M
+ Na]+) calcd for C28H31NO9Na: 548.1897, found 548.1901.
Synthesis of BA-10
To a stirred solution
of BA-8 (600 mg, 1.60 mmol) and triethylamine (2 mL,
15 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was added methacrylic anhydride
(0.50 mL, 3.20 mmol) followed by DMAP (19.4 mg, 0.16 mmol) at room
temperature. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h.
After the reaction was completed, the solution was quenched by addition
of a saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (10 mL) and the aqueous
phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined
organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography
(hexane/ethyl acetate = 8:1) of the residue gave a white amorphous
solid (606 mg, 1.41 mmol, 88%) as the product. BA-10:
(58 mg, 0.13 mmol, 88%), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (dd, J = 6.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.15–6.05
(m, 2H), 6.06–5.94 (m, 1H), 5.55 (p, J = 1.6
Hz, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 5.02 (ddd, J = 9.7, 7.8, 2.3
Hz, 1H), 4.30 (q, J = 11.1 Hz, 2H), 2.99 (dt, J = 11.6, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 7.5
Hz, 1H), 2.52–2.39 (m, 1H), 2.14 (d, J = 6.9
Hz, 1H), 1.90 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3H), 1.84 (dq, J = 7.3, 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.76 (m, 1H), 1.67 (p, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.30–1.24 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s,
3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 209.4, 177.8, 166.6, 165.7, 161.9, 139.4, 135.6, 130.0, 127.0,
126.4, 77.7, 77.3, 77.2, 77.0, 76.7, 72.5, 67.5, 54.9, 53.5, 50.5,
39.7, 29.7, 26.1, 20.3, 19.8, 18.9, 18.3, 18.1, 15.6. HRMS (ESI/[M
+ H]+) calcd for C25H23O7: 445.2221, found 445.2225.
Synthesis of BA-11
To a stirred solution
of BA-8 (600 mg, 1.60 mmol) and triethylamine (2 mL,
15 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was added acetic anhydride (0.30
mL, 3.20 mmol) followed by DMAP (19.4 mg, 0.16 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction was stirred at room temperature until TLC showed completion
of the reaction. The reaction was then quenched by addition of a saturated
NH4Cl aqueous solution (10 mL), and the aqueous phase was
extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic
extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered,
and concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 10:1) of the residue gave a white solid powder (655 mg,
1.57 mmol, 98%) as the product. BA-11: 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69 (dd, J = 6.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.14 (dd, J = 11.0, 2.5 Hz,
1H), 6.07 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (s, 1H),
5.04–5.08 (m, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J = 34.0, 11.0
Hz, 2H), 3.03 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.48–2.54 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.19
(m, 1H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 1.93 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz,
3H), 1.82–1.86 (m, 1H), 1.81 (s, 3H), 1.74 (s, 3H), 1.56 (s,
3H), 1.33 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 3H), 1.21 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 209.37, 177.80,
170.28, 165.86, 161.87, 139.10, 130.14, 127.17, 77.53, 72.64, 67.19,
54.80, 53.40, 50.18, 39.56, 30.20, 29.67, 26.16, 20.66, 20.30, 19.84,
18.95, 18.44, 15.60; HRMS (ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C23H31O7: 419.2070, found 419.2073.
Synthesis of BA-12
To a stirred solution
of BA-8 (600 mg, 1.60 mmol) and triethylamine (2 mL,
15 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 mL) was added succinic anhydride (320
mg, 3.20 mmol) followed by DMAP (19.4 mg, 0.16 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 days. After the
reaction was completed, the solution was quenched by addition of a
2 N HCl aqueous solution (15 mL) and the aqueous phase was extracted
with ethyl acetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
concentrated. Silica gel flash column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 1:1) of the residue gave a white solid powder (532 mg, 1.15
mmol, 72%) as the product. BA-12: 1H NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (dd, J = 6.0,
1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (dd, J = 6.0, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.04
(dq, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 5.01 (ddd, J = 9.4, 7.5, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (q, J =
10.9 Hz, 2H), 2.99 (dt, J = 11.7, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.92
(d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (d, J =
1.6 Hz, 4H), 2.48–2.39 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.08 (m, 1H), 1.97–1.82
(m, 3H), 1.79 (ddd, J = 15.8, 7.1, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 1.70
(q, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.31–1.23
(m, 7H), 1.17 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 209.6, 177.8, 171.4, 166.0, 162.1, 139.5,
130.1, 127.1, 77.6, 77.3, 77.0, 76.8, 72.6, 67.6, 54.8, 53.4, 50.2,
39.4, 29.7, 29.3, 28.9, 28.7, 26.1, 20.3, 19.8, 18.9, 18.4, 15.6.HRMS
(ESI/[M + H]+) calcd for C25H33O9: 477.2119, found 477.2122.
Cell Lines and Culture
Reagents
A549 (human alveolar
basal epithelial adenocarcinoma), SW480 (colon adenocarcinoma), and
MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinomas) were purchased
from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were
maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
or Roswell Park Memorial Institution (RPMI)-1640 medium (Life Technologies)
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and
penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL), at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cell lines were tested and confirmed to be free of mycoplasma contamination.
Cell Viability Assessment
The cell viability of different
cancer cell lines under drug treatment was determined via the MTT
assay. Cells were seeded at a density of 6 × 103 (A549),
4 × 103 (SW480), or 5 × 103 (MDA-MB-231
or MCF-7) cells per well in 96-well plates. After 24 h, cells were
treated with various concentrations (0–50 μM) of BA compounds
for another 48 h. Cells were then treated with 0.5 mg/mL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 37 °C for 4 h. Media
was removed after incubation, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Duksan,
Korea) was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals. Absorbance
at 570 nm of each well was measured using a CLARIOstar monochromator
microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany). The IC50 values
of different BA compounds in the cell lines were calculated using
Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, CA). Experiments were conducted
in triplicate.
Colony Formation Assay
A549, SW480,
MDA-MB-231, and
MCF-7 cells were seeded in triplicate at a density of 1 × 103 cells per well in six-well plates. After 24 h of incubation,
cells were treated with various concentrations of BA, BA-9, or BA-10 for 14 days. The medium containing
the desired concentration of BA compounds was refreshed once on day
7. At the end of the experiment, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
for 4 h and stained with 2% Giemsa blue solution overnight. Stained
cells were briefly rinsed with Milli-Q water and then imaged. Experiments
were conducted in triplicate.
Cell-Cycle Analysis
A549, SW480, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7
cells were seeded in 60 mm culture plates at a density of 4–6
× 105 cells per plate. After 24 h, cells were treated
with various concentrations of BA, BA-9,
or BA-10 for another 24 h. Cells were then harvested,
fixed, and permeabilized in 70% cold ethanol overnight at −20
°C. Samples were washed twice with cold PBS and incubated with
a PI/RNase staining reagent (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) at room
temperature for 15 min prior to cell-cycle analysis. Flow cytometric
analysis was conducted using a BD FACSVia flow cytometer (BD, San
Jose, CA), and histograms plotted were analyzed with ModFit LT 5.0
flow cytometry modeling software (Verity Software House, ME). Experiments
were conducted in triplicate.
Annexin V–7-AAD/PE
Double Staining Assay
A549,
SW480, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cells were seeded in 60 mm culture plates
at a density of 4–6 × 105 cells per plate.
After 48 h treatment with various concentrations of BA, BA-9, or BA-10, cells were harvested
and suspended in Annexin-binding buffer. Apoptosis was assessed via
flow cytometry with a BD FACSVia flow cytometer using the PE annexin
V apoptosis detection kit (BD, San Jose, CA), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Western Blot
Analysis
A549, SW480, MDA-MB-231, and
MCF-7 cells were seeded in 60 mm culture plates at a density of 4–6
× 105 cells per plate and treated with various concentrations
of BA, BA-9, or BA-10 for 48
h. Cells were harvested and cell pellets were lysed in a radioimmunoprecipitation
assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1
mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)). The DC protein assay
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used to determine protein concentrations.
Equal amounts of cell lysates were electrophoresed through SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels and transferred onto poly(vinylidene
difluoride) (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad). The blots were then blocked
in 5% nonfat skim milk and probed with the following diluted primary
antibodies overnight: cleaved PARP, PARP, cleaved caspase 3, caspase
3, pH2A.X (Cell Signaling Technology), and β-actin (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Blots were then incubated with the corresponding goat
antirabbit or goat antimouse (Life Technologies) horseradish peroxidase
(HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were visualized
using Clarity ECL or Clarity Max Western blotting substrates (Bio-Rad).
Images were obtained using a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad), and
protein expression was analyzed using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
Experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed
using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are presented as
mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and
***P < 0.001 were considered as significant differences.
Authors: Jelili A Badmus; Okobi E Ekpo; Jyoti R Sharma; Nicole Remaliah S Sibuyi; Mervin Meyer; Ahmed A Hussein; Donavon C Hiss Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 4.411