Henok Asfaw Sahile1,2, Maria Santos Martínez-Martínez3, Melissa Dillenberger4, Katja Becker4, Peter Imming1. 1. Institut für Pharmazie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3 Canada. 3. Diseases of the Developing World, Medicines Development Campus, GlaxoSmithKline, Calle de Severo Ochoa, 2, 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain. 4. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Interdisciplinary Research Center, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Abstract
Hirsutellide A is nature-derived cyclic hexadepsipeptide with reported antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial activities. To verify its structure, hirsutellide A was synthesized following a solution-phase peptide synthesis approach. A detailed analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the synthesized compound revealed structural variation from what had been originally assigned for hirsutellide A, despite the use of identical building blocks. This variation occurred at the two allo-Ile moieties. To investigate the structure-activity relationship, the depsipeptide and peptide analogues of hirsutellide A were prepared and tested for antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial activities. The compounds displayed antiplasmodial potency against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 while showing weak or no activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. The drug-likeness of the series was assessed through in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profiling, revealing systematic differences between the pharmacokinetic properties of cyclic hexapeptides and hexadepsipeptides.
Hirsutellide A is nature-derived cyclic hexadepsipeptide with reported antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial activities. To verify its structure, hirsutellide A was synthesized following a solution-phase peptide synthesis approach. A detailed analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the synthesized compound revealed structural variation from what had been originally assigned for hirsutellide A, despite the use of identical building blocks. This variation occurred at the two allo-Ile moieties. To investigate the structure-activity relationship, the depsipeptide and peptide analogues of hirsutellide A were prepared and tested for antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial activities. The compounds displayed antiplasmodial potency against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 while showing weak or no activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. The drug-likeness of the series was assessed through in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profiling, revealing systematic differences between the pharmacokinetic properties of cyclic hexapeptides and hexadepsipeptides.
Due to the growing concerns over the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant
microbes, the search for new chemical entities is intensifying.[1] In this regard, small-sized cyclic peptides offer
good promise owing to their potential to target previously nondruggable
drug targets.[2,3] Accordingly, a number of small-sized
peptides, nature-derived or synthetically modified, are being investigated
for their antimicrobial activities.[4−6] Recently, we have reported
the anti-TB potential of wollamide B and its analogues by synthesizing
and testing their activities against Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (Mtb).[7,8] The compounds
demonstrated potent antimycobacterial activities and interesting druglike
attributes such as water solubility, plasma stability, and microsomal
stability, while the membrane permeability still needs further improvement.
The poor membrane permeability was found to be associated with the
overall low lipophilicity of wollamides. Optimizing the structures
of other previously reported lipophilic antimicrobial cyclic peptides
could result in more membrane-permeable bioactive peptides. Additionally,
this could help us figure out the limit of lipophilicity needed to
design membrane-permeable small-sized cyclic peptides. Accordingly,
in this work, we chose another more lipophilic antimicrobial depsipeptide
(hirsutellide A) as a lead for further structural optimization.Hirsutellide A (Figure ) is an 18-membered cyclic hexadepsipeptide that was isolated
from the entomopathogenic fungus Hirsutella kobayasii BCC 1660.[9] The compound showed in vitro
antimycobacterial (M. tuberculosis H37Ra,
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 6–12 μg/mL)
and antiplasmodial (Plasmodium falciparum, IC50 = 2.8 μg/mL) activities.[9] The structure of hirsutellide A was elucidated by analyzing
its NMR spectra and using Marfey’s method. Its structure was
then assigned to be a symmetrical cyclic hexadepsipeptide containing allo-isoleucine (allo-Ile), (R)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid (HPPA), and sarcosine (Sar) residues.[9]
Figure 1
Structures of hirsutellide A (I) and reported synthetic
stereoisomer (II).
Structures of hirsutellide A (I) and reported synthetic
stereoisomer (II).The first attempt to synthesize hirsutellide A was reported in
2005 by Xu et al.[10] The method involved
a stepwise construction of the linear hexadepsipeptide precursor in
the solution phase followed by macrocyclization. However, due to the
use of a “wrong” building block (i.e., Ile instead of allo-Ile), this resulted in the synthesis of one of its
stereoisomers (II).[11] This
stereoisomer (II) showed very similar physical and spectral
properties to hirsutellide A, but when tested against M. tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv, its antimycobacterial
potency was lost.[12]Apart from the aforementioned study, the structure and biological
activities of hirsutellide A were not confirmed through total synthesis.
Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, its structure–activity
relationship (SAR) remained unexplored.The aim of the present work was, therefore, to synthetically verify
the structure of the natural product, to synthesize analogues, and
to evaluate the in vitro antiplasmodial and antimycobacterial activities.
Aiming to assess the drug-likeness of the class, in vitro pharmacokinetic (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
(ADME)) profiling and cytotoxicity assays were conducted.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of Hirsutellide A
The synthesis of hirsutellide
A was initiated using a solution-phase peptide synthesis approach
following a method described by Xu et al., with some modifications.[10] The first step involved diazotization hydrolysis
of d-Phe to the corresponding α-hydroxyl carboxylic
acid (1) (Scheme ). After protecting the carboxy group of 1 as
benzyl ester (2), it was coupled to N-Boc-Sar-OH using EDC*HCl/dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to obtain
the fully protected didepsipeptide 3. This reaction took
only 2 h for completion with a yield of 88%. The same reaction with
the coupling agent dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) took 24 h with a
lower yield (72%).[10,13] The Boc protecting group of the
didepsipeptide was then removed via treatment with trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) (6.5 equiv) to give compound 4.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of the Protected Tridepsipeptide Precursor of Hirsutellide
A
Reagents and conditions: (a)
40% NaNO2, H2SO4, 0 °C to rt,
20 h; (b) BnOH, pTsOH, reflux, 4 h, toluene; (c)
EDC·HCl, DMAP, dichloromethane (DCM), 0 °C to rt, 2 h; (d)
TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 4 h; (e) 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid
hexafluorophosphate (HATU), N,N-diisopropylethylamine
(DIPEA), DCM, 0 °C to rt, 12 h.
Synthesis of the Protected Tridepsipeptide Precursor of Hirsutellide
A
Reagents and conditions: (a)
40% NaNO2, H2SO4, 0 °C to rt,
20 h; (b) BnOH, pTsOH, reflux, 4 h, toluene; (c)
EDC·HCl, DMAP, dichloromethane (DCM), 0 °C to rt, 2 h; (d)
TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 4 h; (e) 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid
hexafluorophosphate (HATU), N,N-diisopropylethylamine
(DIPEA), DCM, 0 °C to rt, 12 h.Coupling the didepsipeptide 4 with N-Boc-allo-Ile-OH using HATU/DIPEA/DCM gave the protected
tridepsipeptide (5). After purification, compound 5 was divided into two equal portions. The first portion was
subjected to catalytic hydrogenation, using Pd/C (10%), to remove
the benzyl protecting group. This afforded compound 6. The Boc protecting group of the second portion was removed using
TFA and yielded compound 7.The synthesis of the linear hexadepsipeptide (8) was
then achieved through a reaction that involved coupling of 6 and 7 using BOP-Cl/DIPEA (Scheme ).[14] The use of
other coupling reagents such as HATU/DIPEA and benzotriazol-1-yl-N-oxy-tris(pyrrolidino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate (PyBOP)/DIPEA
gave very little product. The low yield associated with the use of
these coupling reagents was related to the higher incidence of diketopiperazine
formation.[15,16] This was confirmed here by isolating
the diketopiperazine side product.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of the Hexadepsipeptide Precursor of Hirsutellide A and
Macrolactamization
Reagents and conditions: (a)
10% Pd/C, H2 (5 atm), EtOAc, rt, 12 h; (b) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to
rt, 4 h; (c) bis(2-oxo-3-oxazolidinyl)phosphinic chloride (BOP-Cl),
DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 18 h; (d) 10% Pd/C, H2 (5 atm), EtOAc,
rt, 12 h; (e) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 5 h; (f) HATU, hydroxybenzotriazole
(HOBt), DIPEA, dimethylformamide (DMF), 0 °C to rt, 3 days.
Synthesis of the Hexadepsipeptide Precursor of Hirsutellide A and
Macrolactamization
Reagents and conditions: (a)
10% Pd/C, H2 (5 atm), EtOAc, rt, 12 h; (b) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to
rt, 4 h; (c) bis(2-oxo-3-oxazolidinyl)phosphinic chloride (BOP-Cl),
DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 18 h; (d) 10% Pd/C, H2 (5 atm), EtOAc,
rt, 12 h; (e) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 5 h; (f) HATU, hydroxybenzotriazole
(HOBt), DIPEA, dimethylformamide (DMF), 0 °C to rt, 3 days.The subsequent reductive removal of the benzyl group and cleavage
of the Boc group from 8 gave the linear hexadepsipeptide
precursor. Finally, the desired cyclic depsipeptide (9) was obtained via macrocyclization of this precursor using HATU/HOBt/DIPEA
in DMF at a high dilution (1 mM) and isolated yield of 50%. This is
a significant improvement compared to the previously reported yield
of macrocyclization (22%).[10] The purity
and identity of the final compound were ascertained using high-resolution
mass spectrometry (HRMS), ultraperformance liquid chromatography–mass
spectrometry (UPLC–MS), and NMR.
Compound 9 Exhibited Different Spectral Properties from Hirsutellide
A (I)
While displaying identical HRMS values,
a detailed analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra
of 9 revealed differences from that reported for hirsutellide
A.[9] The 1H chemical shifts of
hirsutellide A, its previously reported synthetic stereoisomer (II),[11] and the newly synthesized
compound (9) are listed in Table . All three compounds displayed similar chemical
shifts for protons that belong to the 2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropionic
acid and sarcosine moieties. However, for the two allo-Ile (Ile) moieties, while the natural product (I) and
its stereoisomer (II) showed similar 1H chemical
shifts, the newly synthesized compound (9) was slightly
different. This particularly pertains to the δH of
the two ethenyl protons on the 4′ positions (H-4′). 1H NMR spectra for hirsutellide A showed signals of the two
H-4′ at δH = 1.19 and 1.55 ppm. This value
was also similar for its stereoisomer (δH = 1.20
and 1.54 ppm). For the newly synthesized compound, the two H-4′
protons appeared to be more shielded and occurred at a higher field
(δH = 1.05 and 1.36 ppm).
Table 1
Comparison of the 1H Chemical
Shifts of Hirsutellide A, Stereoisomer (II) in the Literature,
and the Newly Synthesized Compound (9)
δH, multiplicity
(J in Hz)a
structural unit
hirsutellide
A (I)b9
streoisomer
(II)b10
compound 9
2-hydroxy-3-phenyl-
propanoic acid
1
2
5.63, dd (11.8, 2.9)
5.61, dd (2.8, 11.6)
5.60, dd (11.7, 3.0)
3
2.74, dd (14.0, 11.9)
2.73, dd (11.6, 14.0)
2.73, dd (14.2, 11.8)
3,68, dd (14.0, 2.8)
3.66, dd (2.8, 14.0)
3.65, dd (14.2, 3.0)
4
5, 9
7.16, br d (7.0)
7.29–7.14, m
7.30–7.09, m
6, 8
7.28, dd (7.0, 7.0)
7
7.23, m
l-allo-isoleucine
1’
2’
4.93, dd (10.1, 9.7)
4.91, t (10.2)
4.87, t (10.1)
3’
2.24, m
2.24, m
2.22, m
4’
1.19, m
1.20, m
1.05, m
1.55, m
1.54, m
1.36, m
5’
0.91, t (7.4)
0.90, t (7.4)
0.89, m
6’
0.87, d (6.7)
0.85, d (6.8)
NH
7.57, d (9.7)
7.54, d (10.0)
7.53, d (9.7)
sarcosine
1’’
2’’
3.20, d (17.1)
3.17, d (17.2)
3.17, d (17.1)
4.46, d (17.2)
4.44, d (17.2)
4.40, d (17.0)
NMe
3.27, s
3.25, s
3.26, s
For all of the three compounds, 1H NMR spectra were measured in CDCl3 using a 400
MHz instrument.
Previously reported 1H NMR data.
For all of the three compounds, 1H NMR spectra were measured in CDCl3 using a 400
MHz instrument.Previously reported 1H NMR data.Similarly for hirsutellide A and the reported stereoisomer, while
the two methyl protons at positions 5′ and 6′ appeared
separately as triplets and doublets, they were merged and appeared
as multiplets for the synthesized compound (Figure ). In the 13C NMR spectra, a similar
discrepancy was observed for the chemical shift values of C-2′
to C-6′ (Table S1).
Figure 2
1H NMR spectra of (A) hirsutellide A[9] and (B) compound 9 both measured in CDCl3 using a 400 MHz instrument.
1H NMR spectra of (A) hirsutellide A[9] and (B) compound 9 both measured in CDCl3 using a 400 MHz instrument.The facts that (1) hirsutellide A was shown to have almost identical
physical and spectral properties with the reported stereoisomer (II)[11] and (2) differences observed
in the 1H and 13C NMR between hirsutellide A
and the compound synthesized by incorporating allo-Ile (9) lead us to propose that hirsutellide A contains
Ile rather than allo-Ile.To further test our assumption, we synthesized two peptide analogues
of hirsutellide A incorporating Ile (14) and allo-Ile (16). The two compounds exhibited
the same chemical shift patterns for the Ile and allo-Ile ethenyl protons as hirsutellide A and 9, corroborating
our proposed structure (Figure S11).Moreover, the 1H NMR spectra of the desmethyl analogue
of hirsutellide A (13) synthesized through incorporating
Ile showed very similar chemical shifts for the two ethenyl protons
with hirsutellide A, which further strengthened our assumption (Figure S6).
Synthesis of Depsipeptide and Peptide Analogues of Hirsutellide
A for SAR Study
Depsipeptide (10–13) and peptide (14–20) analogues
of hirsutellide A were designed and synthesized for preliminary SAR
studies (Table ).
While the depsipeptide analogues were synthesized following the approach
used for 9, a standard Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide
synthesis (SPPS) approach on 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin was utilized
to construct the linear hexapeptide precursors of the cyclic peptide
analogues, followed by macrocyclization in the solution phase.[7,8,17] Details of the synthesis protocol
are described in the Supporting Information (Section S1).
Table 2
List of the Synthesized Depsipeptide
and Peptide Analogues of Hirsutellide A
cpd#
I
II
III
X
R
9
allo-Ile
d-Phe
Gly
–O–
–CH3
10
Leu
d-Phe
Gly
–O–
–CH3
11
Val
d-Phe
Gly
–O–
–CH3
12
Gly
d-Phe
Gly
–O–
–CH3
13
Ile
d-Phe
Gly
–O–
–H
14
Ile
d-Phe
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
15
Val
d-Phe
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
16
allo-Ile
d-Phe
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
17
allo-Ile
d-Phe (4-Cl)
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
18
allo-Ile
d-Phe (4-OCH3)
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
19
allo-Ile
Leu
Gly
–NH–
–CH3
20
allo-Ile
d-Phe
Pro
–NH–
–CH3
The depsipeptide analogues (10–12) were designed to assess the effect on the activity of replacing
the aliphatic side chains of the two Ile moieties. Ile was replaced
with other lipophilic amino acids including, allo-Ile, Leu, Val, and Gly.The desmethyl analogue 13 was prepared to see the
effect of removing an N-methyl group. This was done
by replacing the two Sar moieties with Gly.The peptide analogues (14–20) were synthesized
for the purpose of comparing their metabolic stability and potency
with the depsipeptides.[18,19] Compound 15 was the peptide analogue of hirsutellide A that was synthesized
through the exchange of (R)-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic
acid moieties with d-Phe. Compounds 17 and 18 were synthesized by introducing d-Phe analogues
whose phenyl side chains were blocked with either chlorine (17) or a methoxy group (18) at the para position.
This was done to slow down metabolic clearances. Similarly, to investigate
the importance of the aromatic side chains for the observed antimycobacterial
activities, the two d-Phe were exchanged by the aliphatic
amino acid d-Leu (19). The two Sar units of
hirsutellide A were also replaced with Pro (10) to evaluate
the effect of a pronounced change of the conformation (Schemes and ).
Scheme 3
Structure of Hirsutellide A
Scheme 4
General Structural Feature of the Target Cyclic (Depsi)Peptides
Biological Activities and ADME Profiles of Hirsutellide A (9)
To compare with what was reported for hirsutellide
A, in vitro bioactivity testing was conducted for compound 9. The antimycobacterial activity was assessed by determining the
MIC against standard drug-susceptible MtbH37Rv and Mycobacterium vaccae using a microplate alamar blue
broth dilution assay.[20] The antiplasmodial
activity was tested against the chloroquine (CQ)-sensitive P. falciparum strain 3D7,[21] and the result was expressed as IC50 values, representing
the concentration required to inhibit the growth of the parasite by
50% as indicated by the in vitro uptake of [3H]-hypoxanthine
by P. falciparum.[22] In addition, cytotoxicity was assessed using human hepatocellular
carcinoma cells (Hep2G). The results of the tests are displayed in Table .
Table 3
Biological Activities and ADME Profile
of Compound 9
bioactivity/ADME profile of compound 9
values
antimicrobial activities
MIC (Mtb H73Rv)
>80 μM
MIC (M. vaccae)
18.8 μM
IC50 (P. falciparum 3D7)
2.3 μM
cytotoxicity
IC50 (Hep2G cells)
>100 μM
membrane permeabilitya
280 nm/s
% human serum albumin binding
88%
intrinsic microsomal clearance
(Clint)
human
46.53 mL/(min g) tissue
mouse
38.3 mL/(min g) tissue
plasma stability (% remain
after 2 h incubation)b
human plasma
103%
mouse plasma
18%
Passive artificial membrane permeability.
Estimated by quantifying the amount
of a compound remaining after incubation with human and mouse plasma
for 2 h at 37 °C.
Passive artificial membrane permeability.Estimated by quantifying the amount
of a compound remaining after incubation with human and mouse plasma
for 2 h at 37 °C.Parallel to bioactivity testing, in vitro ADME
profiling was also conducted to evaluate its druglike properties.[23] The ADME profiling included (1) a study of physicochemical
properties, viz., passive artificial membrane permeability, humanserum albumin binding affinity, and lipophilicity; (2) determination
of plasma stability after 2 h incubation of the compound with human
and mouse plasma; and (3) metabolic stability, expressed as intrinsic
clearance of the compound in both mouse and human liver microsomes.
The results are also included in Table .While being moderately active against the nonpathogenic Mycobacterium vaccae (MIC of 18.8 μM), compound 9 failed to show activity against MtbH37Rv
(MIC > 80 μM). This finding does not corroborate the anti-Mtb
activity previously reported for hirsutellide A (MIC against MtbH37Ra, 6–12 μg/mL). The stereoisomer (II) was also reported to be inactive against MtbH37Rv.[12] We ascribe the discrepancy to the difference
of the mycobacterial strains. While the natural product had been tested
against an attenuated form of MtbH37Ra, compound 9 and II were tested against the virulent
strain, MtbH37Rv. The virulent
strain was either intrinsically unsusceptible or able to somehow inactivate
or pump out hirsutellide A and analogues. This serves as a note of
caution toward a recent study that found both strains to be equally
susceptible to standard antitubercular agents, including the cyclopeptide
capreomycin.[24]In contrast, compound 9 displayed similar antiplasmodial
potency (IC50 = 2.3 μM) to that reported for hirsutellide
A (IC50 = 4.2 μM), reconfirming the (moderate) antiplasmodial
activity of the natural product. The compound showed a dose-dependent
inhibition of P. falciparum, as shown
in Figure . However,
the antiplasmodial potency was still weak compared to chloroquine,
emphasizing the need for structural modification to perhaps turn it
into a better antimalarial lead.
Figure 3
Plot showing dose-dependent inhibition of P. falciparum 3D7 by compound 9. The error bars represent standard
error, n = 9.
Plot showing dose-dependent inhibition of P. falciparum 3D7 by compound 9. The error bars represent standard
error, n = 9.Coassessing the toxicity and ADME profiles with bioactivity assay
is important in early hit-to-lead optimization phase as it helps reduce
the attrition rate in later stages of drug discovery.[25−27] Accordingly, while testing its activities, ADME profiling and cytotoxicity
assay were conducted. An assay against Hep2G cells proved that compound 9 did not exhibit cytotoxicity (IC50 > 100 μM).Similarly, ADME profiling revealed some desirable druglike attributes.
Among them was its very good permeability through an artificial membrane
(280 nm/s). This is quite interesting as poor membrane permeability
is one of the major hurdles in the design of peptide-related drugs.[28,29] The structural features that seem to be responsible for the observed
good permeability of 9 are the two depsipeptide (ester)
bonds and the lipophilic amino acid side chains. The other relevant
feature of compound 9 was its excellent stability in
human plasma, as indicated by 100% recovery after incubation for 2
h. However, in mouse plasma, it showed poor stability (18% recovery)
because of the different types of plasma esterases in the two species.
Similarly, compound 9 showed moderate stability in human
but low stability in mouse microsomes (Table ). These findings underscore the need to
carefully interpret in vivo drug bioactivity assays
when done in mice models as a lack of activity might have resulted
from poor plasma and/or microsomal stability.
Biological Activities and ADME Profiles of Depsipeptide and
Peptide Analogues of Hirsutellide A
The antimicrobial tests
and cytotoxicity assay of the newly synthesized depsipeptide and peptide
analogues of hirsutellide A were conducted in the same way as for
compound hirsutellide A (9). For a comprehensive comparison,
ADME profiling was also done for some selected depsipeptide and peptide
analogues. The results of the tests are presented in Tables –7.
Table 4
Antimycobacterial and Antiplasmodial
Activities and Cytotoxicities of Depsipeptide and Peptide Analogues
of Hirsutellide Aa
cpd#
MIC(Mtb H37Rv) (μM)
IC50 (P. falciparum 3D7) (μM)
IC50 (Hep2G Cells) (μM)
11
>80
7.5
>100
12
>80
20.1
>100
13
>80
13.8
>100
15
>80
7.7
>100
16
>80
2.2
>100
17
40
1.8
26
18
>80
4.1
>100
20
>80
2.0
>100
INH
2–4
nd
nd
CQ
nd
0.005
nd
INH = isoniazide, CQ = chloroquine,
nd = not determined.
Table 7
In Vitro Plasma Stabilities
of Selected Peptide and Depsipeptide Analogues of Hirsutellide A
plasma stability (% remaining)a
cpd#
human
mouse
12
67
0
13
82
0
19
90
88
20
110
100
Estimated by quantifying the amount
of a compound remaining after incubation with plasma for 2 h at 37
°C.
INH = isoniazide, CQ = chloroquine,
nd = not determined.Kinetic aqueous solubility.Passive artificial membrane permeability;
HSA, humanserum albumin binding; nd, not determined.GSK cutoff values for solubility:[31] >100 μg/mL, high solubility; 30–100
μg/mL, moderate solubility; <30 μg/mL, low solubility.
*GSK cutoff values for permeability:[31] >200
nm/s, high permeability; 10–200 nm/s, intermediate permeability;
<10 nm/s, low permeability.Clint, in vitro intrinsic microsomal clearance.Estimated by quantifying the amount
of a compound remaining after incubation with plasma for 2 h at 37
°C.Similar to hirsutellide A (9), its analogues also
showed poor or no activity against MtbH37Rv. Only compound 17 showed weak activity with MIC = 40 μM. The antiplasmodial
activities, on the other hand, were retained moderately and comparable
to 9 (Table ). Modifications of the exocyclic substituents of the depsipeptide
ring such as replacement of allo-Ile with Val (11), Gly (12), and demethylation of the N-methyl sarcosine (13) reduced the antiplasmodial
activity. Peptide analogues of hirsutellide A were generally more
active against Plasmodium species (IC50 = 1.8–7.7 μM) than the depsipeptide analogues (IC50 = 7.5–20.1 μM). As observed for 9, the inhibition of P. falciparum growth
occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Figure ).
Figure 4
Plots showing dose-dependent inhibition of P. falciparum 3D7 by compounds 16 (a), 17 (b), 18 (c), and 20 (d). The error bars represent
standard error, n = 9.
Plots showing dose-dependent inhibition of P. falciparum 3D7 by compounds 16 (a), 17 (b), 18 (c), and 20 (d). The error bars represent
standard error, n = 9.The ADME profiling revealed some differences between depsipeptide
and peptide analogues.In general, compared to the peptide analogues, the depsipeptides
exhibited improved microsomal stabilities in both human and mouse
plasmas, though the overall microsomal stability of the class in general
is still considered low (Table ). As noted for compound 9, the depsipetide bond
reduced the aqueous solubility and plasma stabilities, especially
against mouse plasma (Tables and 7). Within the depsipeptide class,
exchange of the allo-Ile moiety (in compound 9) with Gly (12) significantly lowered plasma
stability (67%) probably because the alkyl side chain of allo-Ile sterically shielded against plasma esterases. The removal of
the N-methyl groups (13) reduced the
plasma stability (82%), highlighting the importance of N-methylation of peptides to improve their metabolic stability.[17,30]
Table 6
In Vitro Microsomal
Stabilities of Selected Peptide and Depsipeptide Analogues of Hirsutellide
A
Clint (mL/(min g) tissue)a
cpd#
mouse
human
12
52.00
34.00
13
65.90
32.80
15
7.52
3.60
16
47.71
18.90
18
13.25
8.18
19
5.79
6.07
20
8.83
7.14
Clint, in vitro intrinsic microsomal clearance.
Table 5
Physicochemical Properties of Selected
Depsipeptide and Peptide Analogues of Hirsutellide A (9)
cpd#
solubilitya(μg/mL)
permeabilityb,c (nm/s)
%HSA
11
80
560
nd
12
81
150
54.7
13
6
470
91.02
17
34
330
95.24
18
124
290
77.2
19
≥184
380
37.15
20
≥254
330
84.22
Kinetic aqueous solubility.
Passive artificial membrane permeability;
HSA, human serum albumin binding; nd, not determined.
GSK cutoff values for solubility:[31] >100 μg/mL, high solubility; 30–100
μg/mL, moderate solubility; <30 μg/mL, low solubility.
*GSK cutoff values for permeability:[31] >200
nm/s, high permeability; 10–200 nm/s, intermediate permeability;
<10 nm/s, low permeability.
The peptide analogues (9 and 10) generally
exhibited higher aqueous solubility (>180 μg/mL) than the depsipeptide
analogues. Exchanging the two ester groups for amides was found to
enhance mouse plasma stabilities. In addition to their excellent human
plasma stability (≥90%), the peptide analogues 19 and 20 also exhibited improved mouse plasma stabilities
(88 and 100%, respectively).In addition to the ester-to-amide substitution, the membrane permeability
of hirsutellide A analogues seems also to be dependent on the nature
of the amino acid substituents. The more lipophilic the side chains
are, the better is their membrane permeability. Similarly, as the
depsipeptides, the peptide analogues exhibited a wide range of binding
affinities to the humanserum albumin. Within the peptide analogues,
while the introduction of para-chloro substituents
to the two phenyl groups of d-Phe (17) increased
their affinity (95%), the removal of the aromatic side chains (19) significantly lowered their albumin binding (37%).
Conclusions
Hirsutellide A was synthesized using a solution-phase peptide synthesis
approach. A comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR
spectra of the synthesized compound with the natural product revealed
slight variations in the chemical shifts that belong to the two allo-Ile moieties. A thorough analysis of NMR spectra showed
that hirsutellide A contains Ile rather than allo-Ile, as had been previously reported. Depsipeptide and peptide analogues
of hirsutellide A were also synthesized. While the compounds retained
the reported antiplasmodial activity of hirsutellide A, the antimycobacterial
activity of the natural product was not reproduced. A discrepancy
in the antimycobacterial activity of hirsutellide A and the synthesized
analogues could be explained by the use of different mycobacterial
strains (MtbH37Ra vs MtbH37Rv). In vitro ADME profiling proved the drug-likeness of the
synthesized depsipeptide and peptide analogues and provided some rationale
for differences. The findings revealed structural features, especially
for membrane permeability and stability that are relevant for the
future design of cyclic peptide-related drugs.
Experimental Section
Chemistry
General
All of the chemicals and reagents used for
synthesis and purification were purchased from a commercial source
and used without further purification. A polypropylene syringe (Inject,
B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) fitted with a frits column plate was
used for the solid-phase synthesis of linear hexapeptides. Whenever
needed, analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (Silica gel 60
F254, Merck, Germany) was used to monitor the reaction progress. The
purification of the synthesized compounds was done on column chromatography
using silica gel 60 (0.063–0.200 mm, Merck) as a stationary
phase. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESIMS) were acquired
using an SSQ 710 C mass spectrometer, Finningen MAT GmbH, Bremen,
Germany. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Varian Inova Unity
500 (operating frequency, 300 or 500 MHz for 1H NMR and
101 or 126 MHz for 13C NMR), Kolthoff GmbH, Filsum, Germany.
Proton and carbon chemical shifts are reported in ppm. 1H NMR spectral data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity
(s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet,
br = broad, ovlp = overlapping), coupling constant in hertz, and integration.
The purities of the final target compounds were assessed by an independent
quality control team at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Stevenage, using UPLC–MS
with a UV diode array or an evaporative light scattering detector
(ELSD), and MS was used to confirm identity. Generally, the purity
of the synthesized final compounds was found to be >95%.
Synthesis of the Target Cyclic Hexadepsipeptides
Synthesis of Compound 9
(R)-2-Hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic Acid (1)
NaNO2 (12 mL, 40%) was added to an
ice-cooled solution of d-phenylalanine (6.6 g, 40 mmol) in
H2SO4 (1 N, 45 mL) over a period of 1 h. The
reaction mixture was continuously stirred at 0 °C for 8 h and
kept at room temperature for an additional 12 h. To push the reaction
to completion, additional H2SO4 (1 N, 10 mL)
and 40% NaNO2 (6 mL) were added in similar conditions to
above and were continuously stirred for a further 8 h. At the end
of the reaction, the reaction mixture was saturated with NaCl and
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 60 mL). The combined EtOAc extract
was washed with brine, dried with MgSO4, filtered, and
evaporated to give a white crude solid mass, which was recrystallized
from diethyl ether to give the target compound. Yield (68%), R = 0.64 in MeOH, [α]D20 = +20.4 (c 1, ethanol), 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.32–7.13 (m, 5H), 4.33 (dd, J = 8.0, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.09 (dd, J = 13.9,
4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.89 (dd, J = 13.9, 8.0 Hz, 1H). ESIMS m/z calcd for C9H10O3: 166.17; found: 165.22 [M – H]−.
(R)-Benzyl 2-Hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoate (2)
Compound 1 (1.66 g, 10 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.069 g, 0.40 mmol),
benzyl alcohol (1.6 mL, 15 mmol), and toluene (40 mL) were placed
into a 100 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a Stark and Dean distilling
receiver. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux (250 °C)
for 4 h until water was no longer distilled off. After the reaction
was completed, the mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature
and 30 mL of ether and 50 mL of saturated Na2CO3 were added to set the organic and aqueous phases. The organic layer
was separated, and the aqueous layer was washed with ether (2 ×
30 mL). The combined ether extract was again washed with 100 mL of
brine, dried with MgSO4, and filtered, and the solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure to get an oily crude product.
The crude product was then purified via column chromatography on silica
gel using petroleum ether (40–60) and EtOAc (10:1) as a mobile
phase to get a faint yellow oily product. Yield (77%), R = 0.11 in EtOAc /heptanes (1:1), 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3-d) δ 7.47–7.11
(m, 10H), 5.20 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H), 4.51 (ddd, J = 6.4, 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (ddd, J = 14.0, 4.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.07–2.96 (m, 1H), 2.95–2.71
(bs, 1H). ESIMS m/z calcd for C16H16O3: 256.30; found: 279.03 [M + Na]+.
Synthesis of the Didepsipeptide (3)
N-Me-Boc-Gly-OH (0.84 g, 4.45 mmol), 2 (1.14
g, 4.45 mmol), and DMAP (0.05 g, 4.45 mmol) were dissolved in 25 mL
of dry DCM and allowed to cool to 0 °C while stirring. EDC·HCl
(1.02 g, 5.34 mmol) was added to the mixture, and the whole reaction
mixture was continued to be stirred for 2 h at room temperature. After
the completion of the reaction, the contents were transferred to a
separatory funnel. Three layers were formed when water (63 mL) and
EtOAc (84 mL) were added to the separatory funnel. Upon shaking, the
dichloromethane portion that sank down to the aqueous layer was reextracted
to the EtOAc layer to form an organic and aqueous phase. The organic
phase was then separated, and the aqueous layer was reextracted twice
with 50 mL of EtOAc. Finally, the combined organic extract was saturated
with KHSO4, washed with brine, dried by MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The obtained
oily mass was purified by column chromatography using silica gel as
a stationary phase and petroleum ether/ EtOAc (1:1) as a mobile phase.
Yield (88%), R = 0.51 in EtOAc/hexane
(1:1), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3-d) δ 7.25 (m, 10H), 5.33 (dt, J = 9.0, 4.3
Hz, 1H), 5.21–5.04 (m, 2H), 4.14–3.96 (m, 1H), 3.93
(s, 1H), 3.15 (dtd, J = 22.4, 14.3, 8.9 Hz, 2H),
2.81, 2.79 (s, 3H, rotamers), 1.47, 1.33 (s, 9H, rotamers). ESIMS m/z calcd for C24H29NO6: 427.49; found: 450.02 [M + Na]+.
Boc Deprotected Didepsipeptide (4)
Compound 3 (1.73 g, 4.04 mmol) was dissolved in dry DCM (6 mL) and
allowed to cool to 0 °C while stirring. TFA (2 mL, 26.04 mmol)
was added dropwise, and the reaction was slowly allowed to warm to
room temperature and stirred for 4 h. The product was concentrated
under a high vacuum pressure to ensure complete removal of TFA. The
obtained brownish crude mass was used directly for the next reaction
without purification.
Synthesis of Tridesipetide (5)
N-Boc-allo-Ile-OH (0.86 g, 4.4 mmol) and
HATU (1.84 g, 4.8 mmol) were added to a solution of 4 (1.1 g, 3.4 mmol) in dry DCM (30 mL). The mixture was then cooled
to 0 °C, and DIPEA (6.0 mL, 34.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The
reaction was slowly allowed to warm to room temperature and was stirred
for 12 h. It was then quenched by adding saturated ammonium chloride
(2 mL) dropwise, which was followed by the removal of the solvent
under reduced pressure. The residue was then dissolved in 120 mL of
EtOAc, and the organic phase was washed with saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 100 mL) and brine (100 mL), dried with MgSO4, and filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure.
The obtained brownish-yellow oily mass was then purified via column
chromatography using EtOAc/heptane (3:2) as a mobile phase and silica
gel as a stationary phase. Yield (88%), R =0.48 in EtOAc/heptane (1:1), ESIMS m/z calcd for C30H40N2O7: 540.65; found: 563.08 [M + Na]+.
Synthesis of Benzyl Deprotected Tridepsipeptide (6)
Compound 5 (0.89 g, 1.65 mmol) was dissolved
in EtOAc (80 mL) and kept in a hydrogenator reaction vessel. Pd (0.44
g, 10%) catalyst was added to the solution to form a suspension. The
reaction mixture was then subjected to 5 atm hydrogen gas and stirred
overnight. After the end of the reaction, the catalyst was removed
by filtration and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuum to give 6. Yield (92%), ESIMS m/z calcd for C23H34N2O7: 450.53; found: 449.23 [M – H]−.
Synthesis of Boc Deprotected Tridepsipetide (7)
Compound 5 (0.7 g, 1.3 mmol) was dissolved in dry
DCM (10 mL) and allowed to cool to 0 °C while stirring. TFA (2.0
mL, 26.14 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction was slowly allowed
to warm to room temperature and was stirred for 4 h. The product was
concentrated under a high vacuum pressure to ensure complete removal
of TFA. The obtained brownish crude mass was used directly for the
next reaction without purification.
Synthesis of Fully Protected Hexadepsipeptide (8)
Compound 6 (0.57 g, 1.3 mmol) and BOP-Cl
(0.36 g, 1.43 mmol) were added to a solution of 7 (0.56
g, 1.3 mmol) in dry DCM (30 mL). The mixture was then allowed to cool
to 0 °C, and DIPEA (2.1 mL, 13.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The
reaction was slowly allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred
for 18 h. It was then quenched by adding saturated ammonium chloride
(2.5 mL) dropwise. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure,
and the residue was dissolved in 50 mL of EtOAc under vigorous stirring.
Saturated NaHCO3 (50 mL) was added to the flask and continuously
stirred until all of the contents dissolved. The content was then
transferred to a 250 mL separatory flask. The EtOAc layer was again
washed with 50 mL of saturated NaHCO3 and then with brine
(50 mL), dried with MgSO4, and filtered, and the solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained brownish-yellow
oily mass was then purified by column chromatography using heptane/EtOAc
(3:2) as a mobile phase and silica gel as a stationary phase. Yield
(45%), R = 0.13 in heptane/EtOAc (3:2),
ESIMS m/z calcd for C48H64N4O11: 873.04; found: 896.15
[M + Na]+.
Removal of the Benzyl Protecting Groups from 8
Compound 8 (0.39 g, 0.44 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc
(60 mL) and kept in a hydrogenator reaction vessel. A 10% Pd (0.2
g) catalyst was added to the solution to form a suspension. The reaction
mixture was subjected to 5 atm hydrogen gas and stirred overnight.
Afterward, the catalyst was removed by filtration and the filtrate
was concentrated in vacuum; yield: 92%. It was then used directly
for the next reaction.
Removal of the Boc Protecting Groups from 8
The compound obtained in the previuos step (0.32 g, 0.4 mmol) was
dissolved in dry DCM (8 mL) and allowed to cool to 0 °C while
stirring. TFA (2.0 mL, 26.14 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction
was slowly allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 5 h.
The product was concentrated under strong vacuum pressure to ensure
complete removal of TFA. The obtained brownish crude mass was used
directly for the next reaction without purification.
Synthesis of Cyclic Hexadepsipeptide (9)
HATU (0.46 g, 1.2 mmol) and HOBt (0.16 g, 1.2 mmol) were added to
a solution of the obtained crude mass in the above step (0.27 g, 0.4
mmol) in DMF (195 mL). The mixture was then allowed to cool to 0 °C,
and DIPEA (0.7 mL, 4.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction was
slowly allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 3 days.
Following that, the solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure,
the residue was dissolved in 50 mL of EtOAc, washed by saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 100 mL) and brine (100 mL), dried with MgSO4, and filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The obtained brownish-yellowish solid mass was then purified
by column chromatography using heptane/EtOAc (1:1) as a mobile phase
and silica gel as a stationary phase. Yield (50%). RT 1.29 min, mp
254–257 °C, UPLC–MS (UV) purity: 98%, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3-d) δ 7.53
(d, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.08 (m, 10H), 5.60
(dd, J = 11.7, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 4.87 (t, J = 10.1 Hz, 2H), 4.40 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 2H), 3.65
(dd, J = 14.2, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 3.26 (s, 6H), 3.17 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (dd, J = 14.2, 11.8
Hz, 2H), 2.28–2.15 (m, 2H), 1.42–1.32 (m, 2H), 1.10–1.01
(m, 2H), 0.94–0.86 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, cdcl3) δ 174.18, 168.82, 166.76, 136.13, 129.07, 128.56,
127.10, 74.10, 52.95, 51.88, 38.72, 37.89, 36.39, 25.96, 14.32, 11.05.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C36H49N4O8: 665.3550; found: 665.3535.
Synthesis of Compounds 10–13
Syntheses of the depsipeptides 10–13 were achieved following a similar methodology used for
the synthesis of compound 9. Physical properties data,
purity assay, and spectral characteristics of these target compounds
are included in the Supporting Information (Section S2).
Synthesis of the Target Cyclic Hexapeptides (14–20)
The target cyclic hexapeptides were synthesized in two
steps. First, the linear hexapeptide precursors were assembled on
2-chlorotrityl chloride resin support using the solid-phase peptide
synthesis (SPPS) approach, according to a protocol described by Chatterjee
et al.[17]Following this, macrocyclization
of these precursors was done in the solution phase under a highly
diluted environment. This was also done according to a protocol previously
reported by Asfaw et al.[7] Details regarding
the synthesis protocols are also described in the Supporting Information
(Section S1). The structures of the final
compounds were confirmed by a combination of ESIMS and NMR spectral
analyses, and their purities were asserted using UPLC–MS.
Biological Assay
Mtb Inhibition Assay
Bacterial Cells and Culture Media
M.
tuberculosisH37Rv (ATCC 118138) was routinely grown
in 7H9 broth (Difco Middlebrook) supplemented with 10% (v/v) ADC (5%
bovinealbumin fraction, 2% dextrose, 0.004% catalase, and 0.8% sodium
chloride solution) and 0.025% (v/v) Tween 80 at 37 °C in standing
cultures.
MIC Determination
The MIC determination of the target
compounds was performed in 96-well flat-bottom polystyrene microtiter
plates. First, the test compounds were prepared in 10 twofold dilutions
in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) using V-bottom microtiter wells. Similarly,
the positive control isoniazide was prepared in eight twofold dilutions,
starting at a concentration of 160 μg/mL. Following this, 5
μL of the drug and test solutions were transferred to 95 μL
of Middlebrook 7H9 medium (Difco catalog ref 271310). Similarly, 5 μL
of the vehicle (DMSO) was used as the growth and blank controls. The
final inoculum was prepared by 1 to 100 dilution of prestandardized
inoculum (approximately 1 × 107 CFU/mL) in Middlebrook
7H9 broth (10% ADC; Becton Dickinson BBL catalogue ref 211887) and
0.025% Tween 80. This inoculum (100 μL) was then transferred
to the entire plate, except for the blank controls. The plates were
then incubated for 6 days at 37 °C after being sealed in a box
to prevent drying out of the peripheral wells. At the end of the incubation
period, a resazurin tablet (Resazurin Tablets for Milk Testing; ref
330884Y, VWR International Ltd.) was dissolved in sterile phosphate-buffered
saline, and 25 μL of this solution was added to each well and
the plates were then further incubated for 48 h. Endpoint readout
was done by measuring fluorescence using Spectramax M5, Molecular
Devices (excitation 530 nm, emission 590 nm). For each compound, the
average value of the duplicate samples was calculated.
Antiplasmodial Assay
P. falciparum Strain Culture
The chloroquine-sensitive 3D7 strain of P. falciparum was originally obtained from Parasitology Unit, Center for Infectious
Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Germany, and were cultivated using
the previously reported standard protocols.[32]
Determination of IC50 Values
The drug susceptibility
of P. falciparum was studied using
a modified method[33] of the protocol described
previously for the 3H-hypoxanthine incorporation-based
assay.[22] All assays included CQ diphosphate
as standard and control wells with untreated infected and uninfected
erythrocytes. The IC50 values were derived by sigmoidal
regression analysis (Microsoft xlfit). All data from in vitro tests
were recorded three times in triplicate and were given with 95% confidence
limits.
Hep2G Cytotoxicity Assay
Hep2G cells obtained from
Biocat 118138 were maintained in Eagle’s minimum essential
medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% nonessential
amino acids (NEAA), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. The cells were removed from a T-175
TC flask using the same medium and adjusted to a final density of
1.2 × 105 cells/mL. Using a Multidrop instrument,
25 μL of this cell suspension (3000 cells per well) was dispensed
into the wells of 384-well clear-bottom plates. Prior to addition
of the cell suspension, the screening compounds (250 nL) were dispensed
into the plates with an Echo 555 instrument. The plates were then
incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under 5% CO2 and relative
humidity of 80%. At the end of incubation, the plates were equilibrated
for 30 min before the addition of 25 μL (in each well) of a
luminescent signal developer (CellTiter-Glo, Promega). The plates
were then left for 10 min at room temperature for stabilization and
were subsequently read using a ViewLux instrument (PerkinElmer). For
each compound, the average value of the duplicate samples was calculated.The human biological samples were sourced ethically and their research
use was in accordance with the terms of the informed consents. The
use of human biological samples was approved by human biological samples
management (HBSM) core team of GSK and conforms to HBSM GSK policies.
ADME Pharmacokinetic Profiling
Physicochemical properties
including aqueous kinetic solubility, passive artificial membrane
permeability, humanserum albumin (HSA) binding, and microsomal and
plasma stabilities of the synthesized compounds were determined according
to the methods we previously reported.[7]
Authors: S G Franzblau; R S Witzig; J C McLaughlin; P Torres; G Madico; A Hernandez; M T Degnan; M B Cook; V K Quenzer; R M Ferguson; R H Gilman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Marc Tobias Heinrichs; Robert Justin May; Fabian Heider; Tobias Reimers; Sherwin Kenneth B Sy; Charles Arthur Peloquin; Hartmut Derendorf Journal: Int J Mycobacteriol Date: 2018 Apr-Jun
Authors: Henok Asfaw; Katja Laqua; Anna Maria Walkowska; Fraser Cunningham; Maria Santos Martinez-Martinez; Juan Carlos Cuevas-Zurita; Lluís Ballell-Pages; Peter Imming Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.240