Encouragingly, a lot of research studies have demonstrated that two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets applied as an additive in oils show preferable friction-reducing and wear resistance performance. However, the current issue was that an elusive way could be adopted to probe the structure-activity relationship between the structure and tribological properties of bulk layered materials due to the structural evolution during friction testing. In this study, we studied the structure-activity relationship between the structure and tribological properties of bulk layered materials (graphite, h-BN, WS2, and MoS2) by an in situ four-ball friction tester. The morphological and structural changes of the layered materials after in situ four-ball-milling were detected by a series of characterizations. This study revealed the friction-induced nanostructural evolution behaviors of bulk layered materials by a four-ball mode.
Encouragingly, a lot of research studies have demonstrated that two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets applied as an additive in oils show preferable friction-reducing and wear resistance performance. However, the current issue was that an elusive way could be adopted to probe the structure-activity relationship between the structure and tribological properties of bulk layered materials due to the structural evolution during friction testing. In this study, we studied the structure-activity relationship between the structure and tribological properties of bulk layered materials (graphite, h-BN, WS2, and MoS2) by an in situ four-ball friction tester. The morphological and structural changes of the layered materials after in situ four-ball-milling were detected by a series of characterizations. This study revealed the friction-induced nanostructural evolution behaviors of bulk layered materials by a four-ball mode.
Most of the energy consumption and material
loss along with growing
transportation and other industries were ascribed to friction and
wear, as a result accelerating the emission of CO2 and
other harmful gases. Currently, the most effective way to control
or reduce friction and wear is to use a lubricant with good friction
properties.[1] The two-dimensional (2D) layered
materials as lubricant additives were capable of forming protective
films or sliding layers on the contact surface, which were very effective
in reducing friction and wear.[2] Lately,
the bulk layered materials (e.g., graphite, MoS2, WS2, and h-BN) have extensively been used as lubrication additives
to improve the friction and wear properties of lubricants.[3,4] Due to the intrinsically low friction properties of the 2D layered
nanosheet structures, they were desirable in many engineering applications,
where friction coefficients were reduced to 0.07–0.27.[5−8] The proposed mechanism of the friction-reducing performance, which
has been revealed to be a result of a durable boundary film on the
rubbing surfaces to prevent metal-to-metal contact, relied on sliding
between the layers because of weak van der Waals forces.[9−12] Consequently, the structure of 2D layered nanosheets played an intriguing
role in the lubrication properties,[10,13] thus accounting
for an unknown relationship between the structure and friction properties.[14,15]The reports showed that graphene with a certain amount of
native
surface dislocation, vacancies, or interlayer corrugation presented
a higher friction coefficient than the defect-free graphene.[16,17] Fundamentally, the Raman intensity of the D peak and the ID/IG ratio of the
defect-free graphene debris after use increased, suggesting that the
defects and disorders emerged in some local regions of graphene.[18,19] However, after being tested in the duration of the friction process,
the I2D/IG ratio of graphene decreased, indicating that graphene was stacked
to form thick sheets. This gave rise to the formation of a friction
film that separated the two contact surfaces.[20,21] Even at the nanoscale, the direct observation of the tribolayers
formed on the friction interfaces by high-resolution transmission
electron microscopy (HRTEM) also suggested the ordering evolution
of graphene.[22−24] Hence, the friction-induced structural change for
2D layered nanosheets was generally identified. In other cases, many
graphite-like layered materials with an ordered structure also achieved
lower friction.[25] For producing high-quality
2D layered nanosheets, many exfoliation methods have sprung up in
the past decade.[26−28] Among these methods, the exfoliation by ball-milling
has successfully produced a catalog of 2D layered nanosheets (graphene,
MoS2, boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs), etc.) in a liquid
phase.[29−31] Stimulated by this method, herein, we envisioned
a study method to reveal the relationship between the structural change
and the friction coefficient of 2D layered bulk materials on the basis
of a four-ball friction tester.Through in situ testing of the
friction performance in a four-ball
tester, we characterized the structure and morphology of the bulk
layered materials at different friction times and discussed the relationship
between the structural change and friction performance.
Results and Discussion
Figure provides
the particle size distributions of four two-dimensional materials
dispersed in glycerol. As a result of three-time measurements of each
two-dimensional material, it is found that the bulk particles of the
four two-dimensional materials are uniformly distributed in glycerol,
and their average particle sizes are approximately 788, 244, 507,
and 587 nm, respectively.
Figure 1
Particle size distributions of graphite (A),
h-BN (B), MoS2 (C), and WS2 (D).
Particle size distributions of graphite (A),
h-BN (B), MoS2 (C), and WS2 (D).Figure shows
the
friction coefficient curves and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of four two-dimensional
materials before and after ball-milling. It can be seen from Figure A that the coefficient
of friction (COF) of graphite gradually increases to a maximum of
0.1 within 0–2600 s due to the aggregation and shearing of
graphite at the friction interface. Subsequently, the COF gradually
decreases to 0.042 in the range of 2600–21 600 s, showing
a decrease by 58% compared to the maximum. This phenomenon is attributed
to the antifriction effect of graphite.[32] In general, a horizontal slip of low shear force occurs between
the layers of graphite with a high-speed sliding of the friction interface.[8] Correspondingly, the SEM and TEM images show
that the pristine graphite particles exhibit a typical bulklike structure
with a lateral size of 2–4 μm (Figure A1,A2). After undergoing ball-milling exfoliation
in the four-ball mode, the bulk graphite is significantly converted
into a sheetlike structure, accompanied by a 58% reduction in the
friction coefficient and a decline to 0.5–1.2 μm in the
average size (Figure A3,A4). Interestingly, the same results are found in the other three
layered materials (Figure B–D). In contrast to the rigid and thick raw materials
(Figure B1,B2,D1,D2),
the edges and surfaces of ball-milled materials seem to be curly and
coarse (Figure B3,B4,D3,D4),
suggesting a rather low thickness. It is possible that, as the aid
of continuous shearing, the van der Waals forces in the direction
perpendicular to the surfaces were overcome, leading to the warping
and exfoliation of bulk sheets into nanosheets.[33] It is noteworthy that except for WS2, the other
three materials exhibit a significant reduction in both size and thickness.
The WS2 bulk material has not only larger size and thickness
but also stronger van der Waals forces in the interlayer,[34,35] thereby accounting for the difficulty in exfoliation in the four-ball
mode (Figure C1–C4).
Figure 2
Friction
coefficient curve, corresponding SEM and TEM images of
ball-milled graphite (A1–A4), ball-milled h-BN (B1–B4),
ball-milled WS2 (C1–C4), and ball-milled MoS2 (D1–D4) at different friction stages.
Friction
coefficient curve, corresponding SEM and TEM images of
ball-milled graphite (A1–A4), ball-milled h-BN (B1–B4),
ball-milled WS2 (C1–C4), and ball-milled MoS2 (D1–D4) at different friction stages.To further understand the structural evolution of the bulk
layered
materials under friction testing, we conducted HRTEM analysis (Figure ) for the bulk layered
materials before and after ball-milling. Through the in situ ball-milling,
we can obtain several to dozen layers of nanosheets from raw materials.
The reason is that, with the aid of continuous shearing, the van der
Waals forces in the direction perpendicular to the surfaces of 2D
materials are overcome, thus leading to the peeling of raw materials
into nanosheets.[31] This result further
confirms the structural transformation from the bulk layered materials
to few layers during sliding.[36] However,
the ball-milled h-BN and WS2 show obvious disorders and
defects in their structures, which means that highly ordered or less
exfoliated bulk layered materials are prone to generating uncertain
defects by friction.[37] In all, the results
evidently reveal that friction-induced nanostructural evolution occurs.
Figure 3
HRTEM
images of ball-milled graphite (A1, A2), ball-milled h-BN
(B1, B2), ball-milled WS2 (C1, C2), and ball-milled MoS2 (D1, D2) at the lowest friction coefficient.
HRTEM
images of ball-milled graphite (A1, A2), ball-milled h-BN
(B1, B2), ball-milled WS2 (C1, C2), and ball-milled MoS2 (D1, D2) at the lowest friction coefficient.Figure shows
the
X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectra of the bulk layered materials
and ball-milled layered samples. For the four ball-milled materials,
the XRD characteristic peaks show weaker intensity and a slight blue
shift, suggesting the enlargement of the interlayer spacing and the
indication of a weakened π–π stacking interaction.[38,39] The Raman spectra before and after ball-milling are shown in Figure B. Compared to the
Raman spectra of graphite, the D band of ball-milled graphite at ∼1350 cm–1 is attributed to the defect-induced breathing mode
of sp3 rings and the G band at ∼1582 cm–1 is attributed to the E2g mode of sp2-hybridized carbon bonds.[40] Meanwhile,
the enhanced D peak indicates an increase in the order degree of the
exfoliated graphite.[41] For h-BN, the strong
peak at 1365 cm–1 is attributed to the interlayer
E2g mode of h-BN. After ball-milling, the E2g peak of the as-exfoliated h-BN shows a slight blue shift and a decrease
in strength, indicating an increase in disorder and a decrease in
the number of layers.[42,43] For WS2, the intensity
ratios of the two peaks decrease, indicating an increase in structural
disorder. On the contrary, the intensity ratio of the two peaks of
MoS2 increases, indicating that the structure is more ordered.
This is consistent with the results of HRTEM.
Figure 4
XRD patterns (A) and
Raman spectra (B) of graphite, ball-milled
graphite, h-BN, ball-milled h-BN, WS2, ball-milled WS2, MoS2, and ball-milled MoS2.
XRD patterns (A) and
Raman spectra (B) of graphite, ball-milled
graphite, h-BN, ball-milled h-BN, WS2, ball-milled WS2, MoS2, and ball-milled MoS2.Figure shows the
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and UV–vis spectra of the
bulk layered materials and ball-milled layered samples. Apparently,
the UV–vis characteristic peak of the ball-milled layered materials
shifts to a higher peak position, indicating a reduced layer number
(Figure A).[44−46] As shown in the FT-IR spectra of Figure B, for ball-milled graphite, the obvious
augmentation of the band at 3125 cm–1 is associated
with the stretching vibrations of OH[47] and
that of the band at 1748 cm–1 arises from the asymmetrical
stretching of C=O groups, and the peaks in the region of 1500
cm–1 correspond to OH vibrations and single bond
energy between C and O stretching of C–O–C and C–OH,
corroborating the increase of oxygen content after ball-milling.[48] For h-BN, there is no significant change in
the infrared spectrum before and after ball-milling. In the infrared
spectra of WS2 and MoS2, there appears a decrease
in the intensities of the W–S bond and Mo–S bond but
an increase in the intensity of the S–O bond. In general, the
oxygen contents of several materials after ball-milling significantly
increases due to oxidation of the sheet material during the rubbing
process.[49]
Figure 5
UV–vis spectra (A) and FT-IR spectra
(B) of graphite, ball-milled
graphite, h-BN, ball-milled h-BN, WS2, ball-milled WS2, MoS2, and ball-milled MoS2.
UV–vis spectra (A) and FT-IR spectra
(B) of graphite, ball-milled
graphite, h-BN, ball-milled h-BN, WS2, ball-milled WS2, MoS2, and ball-milled MoS2.The wear behavior of different bulk layered materials
can be illustrated
clearly by the morphology of wear scars at the lowest friction coefficient
as shown in Figure . Among these wear scars, those of h-BN and WS2 exhibit
a deeper and wider wear region (Figure B,C) than those of graphite and MoS2 (Figure A,D). For MoS2, the abundant active elements such as Mo and S play an important
role in reducing the wear and increasing the load capacity.[9,50] However, the worn surface of graphite shows smaller wear, which
is ascribed to the flexible layered graphite filling the worn grooves
by exfoliating off few graphene nanosheets and forming stable transfer
films on the worn surface.[51−53] Therefore, it can be inferred
that the relationship between the structural evolution and friction
performance can be revealed by studying the materials before and after
ball-milling.
Figure 6
Three-dimensional (3D) topography images and 2D profiles
across
the wear tracks for flat specimens after wear tests with graphite
(A), h-BN (B), WS2 (C), and MoS2 (D) (100 N,
1200 rpm, 6 h).
Three-dimensional (3D) topography images and 2D profiles
across
the wear tracks for flat specimens after wear tests with graphite
(A), h-BN (B), WS2 (C), and MoS2 (D) (100 N,
1200 rpm, 6 h).The Raman spectra of wear scar
areas are shown in Figure . It can be seen that a more
noticeable and stronger D peak appears on the friction interface lubricated
by the ball-milled graphite (Figure A).[54] Similarly, the Raman
signals of the exfoliated h-BN and WS2 are found on the
worn surfaces. These results demonstrate that the exfoliated nanosheets
can be filled into the groove of the worn surface in ball-milling.[55−57] Therefore, it can be concluded that ball-milling plays a key role
in the structural evolution of bulk layered materials, and the coefficient
could reflect the structural change in bulk layered materials at the
friction interface to some extent. That is to say, the originally
integrated structure makes a great contribution to the better lubrication
properties.
Figure 7
Corresponding Raman spectra of worn steel ball after wear tests
with graphite (A), WS2 (B), MoS2 (C), and h-BN
(D).
Corresponding Raman spectra of worn steel ball after wear tests
with graphite (A), WS2 (B), MoS2 (C), and h-BN
(D).
Conclusions
In this study, we designed
a method to probe the in situ structure–activity
relationship between structural evolution during ball-milling and
the friction coefficient in the four-ball mode. The results showed
that the change of friction coefficient in testing was connected to
the structural evolution of the bulk layered materials.
Experimental
Section
Ball-Milling Procedure
In a typical experiment, 0.1
g of raw material (graphite, h-BN, WS2, MoS2; Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., 99%) and 15 mL of glycerin
(Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., 98.5%) were poured into a container
and sonicated for 2 h to obtain a uniform dispersion. Five milliliters
of the mixture was then transferred into a stainless steel oil canister
in a four-ball friction machine. The ball-milling test of the samples
was carried out by a four-ball machine (MMW-1, Jinan Chenda Co., Ltd.).
The testing was conducted according to the ASTM D4172 standard method
(1200 rpm, 100 N load, and testing duration of 6 h). After the completion,
the collected product was washed with absolute ethanol and water and
then centrifuged for 15 min at 500 rpm. After centrifugation, the
top 80% of the supernatant was pipetted off and the ball-milled layered
material was characterized. The illustration of the relationship studied
between the coefficient of friction and structure of the bulk layered
materials is described in Scheme .
Scheme 1
Description of the Study of Relationship between the
Coefficient
of Friction and Structure by the Four-Ball Mode
Characterizations
The morphologies and sizes of the
as-prepared samples were observed by a field scanning electron microscope
(S-4800II, HITACHI, Japan) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrum
(EDS) and a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai 12, Philips,
Netherlands). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM)
was conducted on a Tecnai G2F30S-TWIN field emission transmission
electron microscope. The phase composition of the as-prepared samples
was investigated using a D8 advance X-ray diffraction instrument (XRD,
Bruker AXS, Germany). Raman spectra were investigated (using an In
Via Raman spectrometer, Renishaw, Britain). Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FT-IR) signals were recorded on a Cary 610/670 micro
infrared spectrometer (Varian). Further, the ultraviolet and visible
(UV–vis) spectra were investigated by a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer
(Varian).