| Literature DB >> 32596289 |
Yuting Sheng1,2, Hao Cheng1,3, Limin Wang1,2,4, Jingyuan Shen1,2, Meiling Tang5, Meixia Liang1,2, Kai Zhang1,2, Hongxia Zhang1,2, Qun Kong6, Mingliang Yu7, Zhizhong Song1,2,4.
Abstract
As one of the most important micronutrients, iron (Fe) plays a critical role in various metabolic processes during plant growth and development. However, the molecular mechanisms towards Fe metabolism and nutrition in fruit trees are largely unknown. In this study, we examined the effects of amino acid-Fe compound fertilizer spraying on leaf development in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) at different developmental stages. Foliar spraying with amino acid-Fe compound fertilizer did not cause any significant changes in leaf morphology but remarkably increased leaf fresh weights. Fe concentration, photosynthetic parameter, and Fe-S protein analyses revealed that Fe accumulation, total chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (P N), and stomatal conductance (g s), as well as nitrite reductase (NIR) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activities, were significantly higher in the leaves sprayed with amino acid-Fe compound fertilizer than in the control leaves sprayed with distilled water. Further quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses demonstrated that Fe-S cluster biosynthesis genes were differentially expressed in the leaves at different developmental stages. Foliar spraying with amino acid-Fe compound fertilizer significantly increased the expression of the most tested Fe-S cluster biosynthesis genes. Our findings provide new insights into the understanding of effects of Fe fertilization application on leaf development in perennial woody fruit trees.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596289 PMCID: PMC7273464 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2854795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Effects of foliar compound amino acid-Fe fertilizer spraying on leaf development in “Xiacui” peach trees. (a) Photos to show the phenotype leaves at different developmental stages sprayed with distilled water (control) and compound amino acid-Fe fertilizer. (b, c) Fresh and dry weights of leaves in (a) were statistically analyzed. (d) Leaf vertical length and transverse length assays. Leaf samples were collected on March 15th (S1), before the spraying treatment, April 10th (S2), July 10th (S3), October 15th (S4), and November 15th (S5), in 2018. Each tree was sprayed with two liters of compound fertilizer on March 15th, April 11th, and July 11th, respectively, or 2 liters of distilled water (control). The fifth leaf from the apex on one-year-old fruiting branches was collected on April 10th (S2), July 10th (S3), and October 15th (S4), respectively. Data are the means of values (n = 3) obtained from three independent sampling replicates ± SE.
Effects of foliar fertilizer spraying on leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic properties at different leaf developmental stagesa.
| Date | Total chlorophyll content (g·kg−1) | Net photosynthetic rate ( | Stomatal conductance (vpm) | Transpiration rate (mmol·m−2·s−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | |
| March 15th (S1) | 0.88 ± 0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| April 10th (S2) | 1.44 ± 0.07 | 1.69 ± 0.06∗ | 23.57 ± 0.19 | 26.98 ± 0.27∗ | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.55 ± 0.03∗ | 3.69 ± 0.12 | 4.22 ± 0.09∗ |
| July 10th (S3) | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 1.82 ± 0.07∗ | 29.68 ± 0.23 | 34.37 ± 0.31∗ | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.05∗ | 4.03 ± 0.26 | 4.27 ± 0.17 |
| October 15th (S4) | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.06∗ | 18.82 ± 0.12 | 22.06 ± 0.39∗ | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.02∗ | 2.61 ± 0.21 | 3.05 ± 0.24 |
| November 15th (S5) | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 4.25 ± 0.06 | 4.52 ± 0.24 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1.08 ± 0.13 | 1.12 ± 0.11 |
aNo detection. ∗ stands for t-test under P < 0.05.
Effects of foliar fertilizer spraying on Fe concentration and Fe-S proteins involved in plant metabolism at different leaf developmental stagesa.
| Date | Fe concentration (g·kg−1 (DW)) | Nitrite reductase (U·mg−1 (protein)) | Succinate dehydrogenase (U·mg−1(protein)) | Aconitase (U·mg-1(protein)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | Control | Fertilizer | |
| March 15th (S1) | 0.94 ± 0.08 | — | 2.83 ± 0.11 | — | 5.21 ± 0.09 | — | 0.29 ± 0.03 | — |
| April 10th (S2) | 1.24 ± 0.07 | 1.56 ± 0.09∗∗ | 3.57 ± 0.13 | 4.27 ± 0.12∗ | 6.43 ± 0.04 | 7.49 ± 0.03∗ | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
| July 10th (S3) | 1.42 ± 0.10 | 1.77 ± 0.12∗∗ | 4.36 ± 0.12 | 4.71 ± 0.14∗ | 6.51 ± 0.09 | 7.52 ± 0.05∗ | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.02 |
| October 15th (S4) | 1.34 ± 0.13 | 1.63 ± 0.13∗ | 3.32 ± 0.12 | 3.56 ± 0.19 | 3.13 ± 0.05 | 3.79 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.05 |
| November 15th (S5) | 1.23 ± 0.12 | 1.49 ± 0.11∗ | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
aNo detection. ∗ and ∗∗ stand for t-test under P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 2Principal component analysis between treatment and variable interaction. Comp.1, total chlorophyll content; Comp.2, net photosynthetic rate (PN); Comp.3, stomatal conductance (gs); Comp.4, transpiration rate (Tr); Comp.5, Fe concentration; Comp.6, nitrite reductase (NIR) activity; Comp.7, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity; Comp.8, aconitase (ACO) activity.
Figure 3Fe-S cluster biosynthesis genes were differentially expressed at different leaf developmental stages. Leaf samples were collected on March 15th (S1), before the spraying treatment, April 10th (S2), July 10th (S3), October 15th (S4), and November 15th (S5), in 2018. The relative expression level of genes was presented after normalization to the internal control Ubiquitin and calculated using a log2 scale. The heatmap was plotted using HemI software according to the method described by Deng et al. [30]. The red and blue boxes indicate the high and low expression levels, respectively.
Figure 4Induced expression of Fe-S cluster biosynthesis genes in the leaves sprayed with compound amino acid-Fe fertilizer. (a) Gene expression in the leaves collected at stage S2 on April 10th, 2018. (b) Gene expression in the leaves collected at stage S3 on July 10th, 2018. (c) Gene expression in the leaves collected at stage S4 on October 15th, 2018. The relative expression level of genes was presented after normalization to the internal control Ubiquitin and calculated using a log2 scale. The heatmap was plotted using HemI software according to the method described by Deng et al. [30]. The red and blue boxes indicate the high and low expression levels, respectively.
Correlation analysis between Fe accumulation and leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and nitrite reductase, succinate dehydrogenase and aconitase activities at stage S3.
| Correlation coefficient | Fe concentration |
|
|---|---|---|
| Chlorophyll | 0.902∗∗ | 0.234 |
| Net photosynthetic rate | 0.878∗ | 0.932∗∗ |
| Stomatal conductance | 0.852∗ | 0.012 |
| Transpiration rate | 0.898∗ | 0.334 |
| Nitrite reductase | 0. 938∗∗ | 0.874∗∗ |
| Succinate dehydrogenase | 0.865∗ | 0.915∗∗ |
| Aconitase | 0.911∗∗ | 0.432 |
∗ and ∗∗ stand for t-test under P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.