| Literature DB >> 32595898 |
Cheng-Chia Yu1,2, Chia-Ming Liu2,3, Tai-Chen Lin2, Ni-Yu Su2, Li-Chiu Yang2, Yu-Chao Chang2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Cyclosporine A; Embryonic stem cell marker; Human gingival fibroblasts; Nanog; Oct4
Year: 2019 PMID: 32595898 PMCID: PMC7305449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1HGFs were treated with indicated concentration of CsA for 24 h. The Oct4 mRNA expression was examined by qRT-PCR. The relative Oct4 mRNA expression represent the mean ± SD. * represents significant difference from control values with p < 0.05.
Figure 2The Oct4 protein expression was examined by western blot. HGFs were treated with indicated concentration of CsA for 24 h. GAPDH was used as protein loading control (Upper panel). Levels of Oct4 protein treated with CsA were measured by AlphaImager 2000. The relative level of Oct4 protein expression for each sample was normalized against GAPDH signal, and the control was set as 1.0. Triplicate experiments were performed. * represents significant difference from control values with p < 0.05 (Lower panel).
Figure 3The silencing effect of Oct4 shRNA in CsA-treated HGFs was validated transcriptionally by qRT-PCR. Single cell suspension of HGFs was transduced with sh-Luc or sh-Oct4 lentivirus, individually or concurrently, and treated with or without CsA (500 ng/ml) as indicated. The relative Oct4 mRNA expression represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, Sh-Luc + CsA group vs. control group; #p < 0.05, Sh-Oct4-1 + CsA or Sh-Oct4-2 + CsA vs. Sh-Luc + CsA group.
Figure 4Total proteins prepared from single cell suspension of HGF transduced with sh-Luc or sh-Oct4 lentivirus, individually or concurrently, and treated with or without CsA were analyzed for CsA expression by western blot. GAPDH was used as protein loading control. Levels of Oct4 protein from HGFs transduced with sh-Luc or sh-Oct4 lentivirus were measured by AlphaImager 2000. Triplicate experiments were performed. * represents significant difference from control values with p < 0.05. # p < 0.05, Sh-ct4-1 + CsA or Sh-Oct4-2 + CsA vs. Sh-Luc + CsA group.
Figure 5The cell viability of the control or Oct4/Nanog-knockdown CsA-treated HGFs was evaluated by an MTT assay. Cells were exposed for 24 h in medium containing 500 ng/ml CsA. * p < 0.05, Sh-Luc + CsA group versus control group. # p < 0.05, Sh-Oct-4-2 + Sh- Naong-1 + CsA vs. Sh-Luc + CsA group.