| Literature DB >> 32595753 |
Mengfei Zhuang1, Yang Cao1, Yan Shi2, Lin Yu2, Yanan Niu1, Tingting Zhang1, Zhaogui Sun2.
Abstract
Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription has been confirmed by the gynecological clinical observation to be effective in the treatment of endometriosis (EMs), and inflammatory cytokines were involved in EMs. In this paper, animal experiments were designed to explain anti-inflammatory mechanisms of Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription on endometriosis. The EMs model was established by autoplastic transplantation, and rats were randomly divided into seven groups: normal control group, model group, ovariectomized group, gestrinone (Western medicine) group, Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription (Chinese medicine) group, celecoxib (inhibitor) group, and combination (Chinese medicine + inhibitor) group. After oral administration for 21 days, the growth inhibitory rates of the ectopic endometria in treatment groups were evaluated, and the levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum and peritoneal fluid were determined by ELISA, as well as the expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) in the ectopic endometrial tissues was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and western blotting. The growth inhibitory rates of the ectopic endometria were significantly higher in the Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription group and gestrinone group, in comparison with the model group (p < 0.05). In the Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription group, the levels of inflammatory cytokines including IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and PGE2 were all reduced in the serum and peritoneal fluid (p < 0.05). In addition, the specific expression of PTGS2 in the ectopic endometrial tissues significantly decreased in the Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription group and PTGS2 inhibitor celecoxib group both at mRNA and protein levels, but in the steroid hormone drug gestrinone group not at the mRNA level. So, Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription has a reliable therapeutic effect on the EMs by its comprehensive anti-inflammatory roles, possibly in a way different from gestrinone.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32595753 PMCID: PMC7275949 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9627907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Different oral administrations in groups of rats.
| Groups |
| Oral administrations | Dosage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 5 | Physiological saline | 10 ml/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Model | 8 | Physiological saline | 10 ml/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Ovariectomized | 8 | Physiological saline | 10 ml/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Gestrinone | 8 | Gestrinone | 0.5 mg/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription | 8 | Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription | 27.72 g/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Celecoxib | 8 | Celecoxib | 0.025 g/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
| Combination | 8 | Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription + celecoxib | 13.86 g/(kg·BW·d) + 0.0125 g/(kg·BW·d) × 21 d |
Primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR in this study.
| Gene | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| PTGS2 | GTGCCGGGTCTGATGATGTA | TGAAGTGGTAACCGCTCAGG |
| GAPDH | GGCAAGTTCAACGGCACAGT | ATGACATACTCAGCACCGGC |
The volume and growth inhibitory rates of ectopic endometrium before and after treatment .
| Group |
| Volume before treatment (mm3) | Volume after treatment (mm3) | Growth inhibitory rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 8 | 148.208 ± 40.089 | 103.224 ± 28.346 | 27.76 ± 21.95 |
| Ovariectomized | 8 | 149.470 ± 41.566 ( | 37.523 ± 7.663 | 73.25 ± 8.35 |
| Gestrinone | 7 | 154.425 ± 37.679 ( | 59.860 ± 21.167 | 61.36 ± 8.09 |
| Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription | 8 | 160.254 ± 37.726 ( | 64.944 ± 21.322 | 58.40 ± 13.93 |
| Celecoxib | 7 | 147.474 ± 43.941 ( | 89.014 ± 30.722 ( | 40.19 ± 8.06 ( |
| Combination | 7 | 150.559 ± 43.134 ( | 73.330 ± 29.502 | 52.65 ± 8.66 |
|
| — | 0.335 | 5.480 | 27.465 |
|
| — | 0.960 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
p < 0.05, compared with the model group.
The content of IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α in the peritoneal fluid after treatment .
| Group |
| IL-1 (ng/L) | IL-2 (ng/L) | IL-6 (pg/ml) | TNF- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 5 | 126.96 ± 15.34 | 993.98 ± 101.44 | 62.13 ± 12.42 | 220.80 ± 24.24 |
| Model | 8 | 228.80 ± 15.39☆ ( | 2132.55 ± 99.41☆ ( | 143.42 ± 7.62☆ ( | 511.78 ± 18.45☆ ( |
| Ovariectomized | 8 | 156.15 ± 32.29 | 1365.05 ± 398.65 | 111.38 ± 23.37 | 263.47 ± 48.45 |
| Gestrinone | 7 | 159.96 ± 21.22 | 1606.71 ± 200.78 | 95.43 ± 8.92 | 308.22 ± 17.88 |
| Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription | 8 | 130.30 ± 19.32 | 1356.89 ± 279.98 | 108.27 ± 15.45 | 356.01 ± 47.73 |
| Celecoxib | 7 | 147.52 ± 25.35 | 1342.12 ± 107.68 | 111.25 ± 19.78 | 309.57 ± 38.81 |
| Combination | 7 | 128.75 ± 24.85 | 1168.52 ± 194.83 | 91.43 ± 15.70 | 274.11 ± 31.82 |
|
| — | 8.529 | 8.118 | 9.102 | 28.595 |
|
| — | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
p < 0.05, compared with the model group. ☆ expresses p < 0.05, compared with the normal control group.
The content of PGE2 in the serum and peritoneal fluid .
| Group |
| PGE2 (ng/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | Peritoneal fluid | ||
| Normal control | 5 | 240.95 ± 25.13 | 260.01 ± 27.28 |
| Model | 8 | 478.39 ± 77.40☆ ( | 505.20 ± 25.83☆ ( |
| Ovariectomized | 8 | 313.27 ± 49.15 | 371.30 ± 36.57 |
| Gestrinone | 7 | 303.94 ± 46.61 | 334.92 ± 29.18 |
| Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription | 8 | 365.71 ± 102.61 | 336.21 ± 75.96 |
| Celecoxib | 7 | 413.80 ± 79.68 ( | 373.57 ± 58.15 |
| Combination | 7 | 342.31 ± 56.21 | 336.22 ± 53.67 |
|
| — | 11.656 | 8.104 |
|
| — | 0.001 | 0.001 |
p < 0.05, compared with the model group. ☆ indicates p < 0.05, compared with the normal control group.
Figure 1The expression of PTGS2 in ectopic endometrium tissues of rats in each group presented by IHC after DAB staining. (a) Model group, original objective magnification 20x, (b) model group, (c) ovarietomized group, (d) gestrinone group, (e) caulis Sargentodoxae prescription group, (f) celecoxib group, (g) combination group, original objective magnification 40x, and (h) negative control, original objective magnification 20x. The arrow indicates the positive site that deserves attention.
Figure 2The mRNA and protein expression of PTGS2 in ectopic endometrium tissues of rats in each group. (a) The mRNA expression of PTGS2 in ectopic endometrium as assessed by real-time PCR. (b) Semiquantitative analysis on the relative levels of the protein PTGS2. (c) The photos of protein bands of PTGS2 in ectopic endometrium presented by western blotting. Lanes A–F: model group, ovariectomized group, gestrinone group, Caulis Sargentodoxae prescription group, celecoxib group, and combination group. In the bar charts, p < 0.05, compared with the model group.