Literature DB >> 32595033

Childbirth experience in women participating in a continuity of midwifery care project.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1, Annika Karlström2, Birgitta Larsson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuity models of care are rare in Sweden, despite the evidence of their benefit to women and babies. Previous studies have shown certain factors are associated with a positive birth experience, including continuity of midwifery care. AIM: The aim was to investigate women's childbirth experiences in relation to background data, birth outcome and continuity with a known midwife, in a rural area of Sweden.
METHODS: An experimental cohort study. Participating women were offered continuity of midwifery care in pregnancy and birth, during selected time periods. Data were collected in mid-pregnancy and two months after birth. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire was used to determine women's birth experiences. RESULT: A total of 226 women responded to the follow-up questionnaire. Not living with a partner, fear of giving birth, and a birth preference other than vaginal were associated with a less positive birth experience. Having had a vaginal birth with no epidural, no augmentation and no birth complication all yield a better birth experience. Women who had had a known midwife were more likely to have had a positive birth experience overall, predominantly in the domain Professional support.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that women who received care from a known midwife in labour were more likely to have a positive birth experience. The results also pointed out the benefits of a less medicalized birth as important for a good birth experience, and that some women may need extra support to avoid a less positive birth experience.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth experience; Cohort study; Continuity; Midwifery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32595033     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  6 in total

1.  Women's perception of continuity of team midwifery care in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Sholeh Shahinfar; Parvin Abedi; Mahin Najafian; Zahra Abbaspoor; Eesa Mohammadi; Narges Alianmoghaddam
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Kris Y W Lok; Heidi S L Fan; Rachel W T Ko; Jojo Y Y Kwok; Janet Y H Wong; Daniel Y T Fong; Noel W M Shek; Hextan Y S Ngan; Edmond P H Choi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and after birth in women living in Sweden who received treatments for fear of birth.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Christine Rubertsson
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Immigrant women's experiences with Norwegian maternal health services: implications for policy and practice.

Authors:  Lydia Mehrara; Trude Karine Olaug Gjernes; Susan Young
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2022-12

6.  Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth.

Authors:  Katariina Place; Leena Rahkonen; Niina Verho-Reischl; Katti Adler; Seppo Heinonen; Heidi Kruit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.