| Literature DB >> 32594243 |
Anand Sanmugam1, Ganesh Vythilingam2, Srihari Singaravel2, Shireen Anne Nah2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented test on the delivery and management of healthcare services globally. This study describes the adaptive measures taken and evolving roles of the members of the paediatric surgery division in a developing country during this period.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Paediatric; Pandemic; Pediatric; SARS-CoV-2; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32594243 PMCID: PMC7320241 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04704-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Surg Int ISSN: 0179-0358 Impact factor: 1.827
Surgical procedures allowed to proceed by hospital alert status across all surgical specialties
| Phase I | Phase II | Phase III |
|---|---|---|
| Semi-urgent setting | Urgent setting | Disaster setting |
| Patient survivorship compromised if surgery not performed within 3 months | Patient survivorship compromised if surgery not performed within days | Patient survivorship compromised if surgery not performed within hours |
| (Surgical specialties can perform acute emergency surgeries, emergency surgeries and all semi-emergencies- incl. Category A and B)* | (Surgical specialties can perform surgeries limited to acute emergencies, emergencies and category-A semi-emergenies)* | (Surgical specialties are limited to performing surgeries for acute emergencies only)* |
*Definitions of acute emergencies, acute emergencies, semi-emergencies category A/B were decided by individual specialties and approved by the Council of Surgeons, UMMC
Stratification of paediatric surgery cases by urgency in compliance to hospital alert status
| Semi-emergency | Emergency | Acute emergency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category A | Category B | ||
Intestinal obstruction (e.g., anorectal malformation, intestinal atresia, oesophageal atresia) | Critical vascular access—(failed peripherally inserted central catheter insertion under interventional radiology) | Perforated viscus | Malrotation with volvulus |
| Congenital diaphragmatic hernia | Paediatric oncology cases | Intussusception (failed pneumatic reduction) | Severe trauma with uncontrolled bleeding |
| Failure of non-operative management of the following: | Obstructed inguinal hernia | ||
| Gastroschisis—failure of non-operative reduction | Necrotising enterocolitis with perforation | ||
| Appendicitis—failure of conservative management | Gonadal torsion | ||
Outcomes of adjustments to paediatric surgery services
| Adjustments to clinical services | Outcomes | Challenges and mitigation strategies to changes adopted | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concern(s) | Mitigation strategy | ||
| Stratification of surgeries by urgency and hospital alert status | Effective triage of cases by urgency | Appropriate delivery of care to patients presenting as emergencies/semi-emergencies | Clear ‘decanting’ protocol and early/urgent referral and transfer process involving the other two paediatric surgical services in the city |
| Risk of patients being listed not being approved by central theatre committee | Representation of Paediatric Surgery Division in committee. Indications for listing clearly identified and communicated to justify scheduling | ||
| No unplanned admissions of patients postponed | Change to prior structure where there was an equitable distribution of operating theatre lists amongst consultants | Unification of waitlists and stratification of cases by discussions involving all consultants within division | |
| Well received by parents upon explaining the justification of these measures | Justifying postponements and revised structure of operative services co-managing non-surgical units | Multi-disciplinary team meetings to discuss scheduling and ‘triage’ of patients affected by new stratification | |
| Modifications to paediatric surgery out-patient clinic sessions and scheduling | Compliance to appropriate social distancing | Patients who could not be contacted turning up to clinic appointments | Screening counters to ensure patients/parents have temperature taken, answer a exposure risk questionnaire and allotment of seats in waiting room to ensure appropriate social distancing |
| “Checking-in” phone calls to patients whose appointments were postponed, well received | |||
| Patient management and policy writing involving multidisciplinary teams | Well received by all stakeholders | – | – |
| Similar degree of dynamic and open exchange of ideas as ‘face-to-face’ meetings observed | |||
| Redeployment of manpower | Fostering of comradeship between the surgical services and other frontline services (Emergency Department, Primary Care Clinics) | Staff strength during de-escalation of hospital alert staff and resumption of services | Weekly to fortnightly review of HCW quarantine status and re-allocation of manpower to areas of need/parent departments if needed |