| Literature DB >> 32594103 |
Adriana Balduzzi1, Halvard Bönig2, Andrea Jarisch3, Tiago Nava4, Marc Ansari4, Alessandro Cattoni5, Giulia Prunotto5, Giovanna Lucchini6, Gergely Krivan7, Toni Matic8, Krzyzstof Kalwak9, Akif Yesilipek10, Marianne Ifversen11, Peter Svec12, Jochen Buechner13, Kim Vettenranta14, Roland Meisel15, Anita Lawitschka16, Christina Peters16, Brenda Gibson17, Arnaud Dalissier18, Selim Corbacioglu19, André Willasch3, Jean-Hugues Dalle20, Peter Bader3.
Abstract
Up to 40% of donor-recipient pairs in SCT have some degree of ABO incompatibility, which may cause severe complications. The aim of this study was to describe available options and survey current practices by means of a questionnaire circulated within the EBMT Pediatric Diseases Working Party investigators. Major ABO incompatibility (donor's RBCs have antigens missing on the recipient's cell surface, towards which the recipient has circulating isohemagglutinins) requires most frequently an intervention in case of bone marrow grafts, as immediate or delayed hemolysis, delayed erythropoiesis and pure red cell aplasia may occur. RBC depletion from the graft (82%), recipient plasma-exchange (14%) were the most common practices, according to the survey. Graft manipulation is rarely needed in mobilized peripheral blood grafts. In case of minor incompatible grafts (donor has isohemagglutinins directed against recipient RBC antigens), isohemagglutinin depletion from the graft by plasma reduction/centrifugation may be considered, but acute tolerability of minor incompatible grafts is rarely an issue. According to the survey, minor ABO incompatibility was either managed by means of plasma removal from the graft, especially when isohemagglutinin titer was above a certain threshold, or led to no intervention at all (41%). Advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32594103 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0981-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483