Carrie M Mintz1, Ned J Presnall2, John M Sahrmann3, Jacob T Borodovsky2, Paul E A Glaser2, Laura J Bierut2, Richard A Grucza2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: mintzc@wustl.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine at Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adolescents with opioid use disorder (OUD) are an understudied and vulnerable population. We examined the association between age and six-month treatment retention, and whether any such association was moderated by medication treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used an insurance database with OUD treatment claims from 2006-2016. We examined 261,356 OUD treatment episodes in three age groups: adolescents (ages 12-17), young adults (18-25) and older adults (26-64). We used logistic regression to estimate prevalence of six-month retention before and after stratification by treatment type (buprenorphine, naltrexone, or psychosocial only). Insurance differences (commercial vs Medicaid) in medication treatment prevalence were also assessed. RESULTS: Adolescents were less likely to be retained compared to adults (17.6 %; 95 % CI 16.5-18.7 % for adolescents; 25.1 %; 95 % CI 24.7-25.4 % for young adults; 33.3 %; 95 % CI 33.0-33.5 % for older adults). This disparity was reduced after adjusting for treatment type. For all ages, buprenorphine was more strongly associated with retention than naltrexone or psychosocial treatment. Adolescents who received buprenorphine were more than four times as likely to be retained in treatment (44.8 %; 95 % CI 40.6-49.0) compared to those who received psychosocial services (9.7 %; 95 % CI 8.8-10.8). Persons with commercial insurance were more likely to receive medication than those with Medicaid (73 % vs 36 %, (χ2 = 38,042.6, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Age disparities in six-month treatment retention are strongly related to age disparities in medication treatment. Results point to need for improved implementation of medication treatment for persons with OUD, regardless of age or insurance status.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adolescents with opioid use disorder (OUD) are an understudied and vulnerable population. We examined the association between age and six-month treatment retention, and whether any such association was moderated by medication treatment. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used an insurance database with OUD treatment claims from 2006-2016. We examined 261,356 OUD treatment episodes in three age groups: adolescents (ages 12-17), young adults (18-25) and older adults (26-64). We used logistic regression to estimate prevalence of six-month retention before and after stratification by treatment type (buprenorphine, naltrexone, or psychosocial only). Insurance differences (commercial vs Medicaid) in medication treatment prevalence were also assessed. RESULTS: Adolescents were less likely to be retained compared to adults (17.6 %; 95 % CI 16.5-18.7 % for adolescents; 25.1 %; 95 % CI 24.7-25.4 % for young adults; 33.3 %; 95 % CI 33.0-33.5 % for older adults). This disparity was reduced after adjusting for treatment type. For all ages, buprenorphine was more strongly associated with retention than naltrexone or psychosocial treatment. Adolescents who received buprenorphine were more than four times as likely to be retained in treatment (44.8 %; 95 % CI 40.6-49.0) compared to those who received psychosocial services (9.7 %; 95 % CI 8.8-10.8). Persons with commercial insurance were more likely to receive medication than those with Medicaid (73 % vs 36 %, (χ2 = 38,042.6, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Age disparities in six-month treatment retention are strongly related to age disparities in medication treatment. Results point to need for improved implementation of medication treatment for persons with OUD, regardless of age or insurance status.
Authors: Lisa A Marsch; Warren K Bickel; Gary J Badger; Marne E Stothart; Kimberly J Quesnel; Catherine Stanger; John Brooklyn Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-10
Authors: Scott E Hadland; J Frank Wharam; Mark A Schuster; Fang Zhang; Jeffrey H Samet; Marc R Larochelle Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo; Ken Bachrach; Genie L Bailey; Snehal Bhatt; Sarah Farkas; Marc Fishman; Phoebe Gauthier; Candace C Hodgkins; Jacquie King; Robert Lindblad; David Liu; Abigail G Matthews; Jeanine May; K Michelle Peavy; Stephen Ross; Dagmar Salazar; Paul Schkolnik; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Geetha Subramaniam; John Rotrosen Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dennis McCarty; Brian Chan; Bradley M Buchheit; Christina Bougatsos; Sara Grusing; Roger Chou Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022 May-Jun 01 Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Kevin Y Xu; Jacob T Borodovsky; Ned Presnall; Carrie M Mintz; Sarah M Hartz; Laura J Bierut; Richard A Grucza Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Carrie M Mintz; Kevin Y Xu; Ned J Presnall; Sarah M Hartz; Frances R Levin; Jeffrey F Scherrer; Laura J Bierut; Richard A Grucza Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Carrie M Mintz; Ned J Presnall; Kevin Y Xu; Sarah M Hartz; John M Sahrmann; Laura J Bierut; Richard A Grucza Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Kevin Y Xu; Ned Presnall; Carrie M Mintz; Jacob T Borodovsky; Nisha R Bhat; Laura J Bierut; Richard A Grucza Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01