| Literature DB >> 32593292 |
Jin-Yan Zhang1,2,3, Zhu Cun1,2,3, Jun-Wen Chen4,5,6.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Chloroplast; Nitrogen; Non-photochemical quenching; Panax notoginseng; Photosynthesis; Rubisco
Year: 2020 PMID: 32593292 PMCID: PMC7321538 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02434-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Effects of nitrogen regimes on the leaf morphology, anatomy and biomass in a shade-tolerant plant Panax notoginseng
| Variables | Nitrogen level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LN | MN | HN | |
| Upper epidermis (μm) | 11.209 ± 0.024 c | 17.694 ± 1.927 a | 14.738 ± 0.269 b |
| Lower epidermis (μm) | 10.590 ± 1.027 c | 13.177 ± 2.186 a | 11.420 ± 0.918 b |
| Spongy tissue (μm) | 42.551 ± 2.194 c | 70.378 ± 0.182 a | 56.518 ± 0.189 b |
| Palisade tissue (μm) | 17.069 ± 1.283 c | 32.867 ± 0.173 a | 24.490 ± 1.825 b |
| Palisade/spongy | 0.401 ± 0.002 | 0.467 ± 0.016 | 0.433 ± 0.016 |
| Leaf length (cm) | 6.484 ± 1.980 c | 7.515 ± 1.068 a | 6.795 ± 1.238 b |
| Max width (cm) | 2.777 ± 0.698 c | 3.114 ± 0.621 ab | 3.273 ± 0.519 a |
| Leaf length/max width | 2.341 ± 1.339 | 2.413 ± 0.8445 | 2.076 ± 0.879 |
| Leaf dry weight (g plant− 1) | 0.413 ± 0.040 c | 0.545 ± 0.025 a | 0.496 ± 0.064 b |
| Total dry weight (g plant− 1) | 1.068 ± 0.294 c | 1.649 ± 0.181 a | 1.524 ± 0.088 b |
Values are means ± SD. (n = 7). Different letters among nitrogen regimes indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 1Electron micrograph of chloroplast with low(a), moderate(b) and high(c) nitrogen level were taken at 5000, 5000 and 5000 times, respectively
Effects of N regimes on leaf photosynthesis in Panax notoginseng
| Variables | LN | MN | HN |
|---|---|---|---|
| gs (mol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 0.05 ± 0.02 a | 0.03 ± 0.02 ab | 0.03 ± 0.02 ab |
| gm (mol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 0.09 ± 0.01 c | 0.26 ± 0.04 b | 0.36 ± 0.02 a |
| Rd (μmol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 1.0 ± 0.04 a | 0.52 ± 0.02 b | 0.57 ± 0.03 b |
| glip (mol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 2.61 ± 0.08 b | 5.52 ± 0.03 a | 0.183 ± 0.09 c |
| 199.53 ± 8.27 b | 265.45 ± 7.31ab | 291.58 ± 9.15 a | |
| S (mol mol− 1) | 844.15 ± 7.56 b | 1057.25 ± 5.41 a | 860.16 ± 3.89 b |
| S*(mol mol− 1) | 739.39 ± 95.61b | 983.75 ± 67.32 a | 753.41 ± 90.34 b |
| Rubisco activity (nmol/min/g) | 0.643 ± 0.24 c | 40.51 ± 5.39 a | 22.51 ± 4.89 b |
| Rubisco content (μg/g−1) | 6.931 ± 0.36 c | 10.057 ± 0.67 b | 70.494 ± 0.32 a |
| Sc(m2 m− 2) | 8.42 ± 1.25 b | 12.01 ± 1.65 a | 13.15 ± 0.56 a |
| Clip (mol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 0.31 ± 0.06 ab | 0.46 ± 0.02 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 b |
| gi (mol CO2 m− 2·s− 1) | 0.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.35 ± 0.04 a | 0.12 ± 0.05 b |
| gm/Rubisco content | 12.99 ± 1.23 b | 25.81 ± 1.90 a | 5.12 ± 0.78 c |
Values are means ± SD. (n = 7). Different letters among nitrogen regimes indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). gs: stomatal conductance; gm: mesophyll conductance; Rd: dark respiration rate; glip: liquid phase; Cc: chloroplastic CO2 concentration; S: the specificity factor of Rubisco for O2 and CO2; S*: apparent Rubisco specificity; Sc: chloroplast exposed to intercellular air space per unit leaf area; Clip: conductance per unit of exposed chloroplast surface area; gi: internal CO2 condutance
Fig. 2a Response of net photosynthetic rate (Anet) to photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in Panax notoginseng grown under low nitrogen (LN), moderate nitrogen (MN), high nitrogen (HN). b The change of net photosynthetic assimilation (Anet) with intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in Panax notoginseng grown under different nitrogen levels. Values for each point were means ± SD (n = 7). Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (ANOVA; P values ≤0.05)
Steady-state photosynthetic-related traits in Panax notoginseng under different levels of nitrogen
| Variables | Nitrogen level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LN | MN | HN | |
| 2.378 ± 0.261c | 3.437 ± 0.241a | 2.600 ± 0.165 b | |
| CE (mol·mol−1) | 0.017 ± 0.002 ab | 0.022 ± 0.003 a | 0.018 ± 0.005 ab |
| 124.399 ± 8.014 a | 99.259 ± 10.957 b | 122.121 ± 21.084 ab | |
| 66.558 ± 6.123 b | 74.518 ± 15.599 a | 63.334 ± 23.251b | |
| 16.480 ± 1.821b | 20.771 ± 2.939 a | 16.830 ± 5.058 b | |
| 4.059 ± 0.127 ab | 3.527 ± 0.337 b | 4.329 ± 0.106 a | |
| SLN (g m− 2) | 0.890 ± 0.130 c | 1.245 ± 0.006 b | 2.178 ± 0.348 a |
Values are means ± SD. (n = 7). Different letter among nitrogen treatments represents a significant level (P ≤ 0.05). Amax: maximum photosynthetic assimilation at the saturating light; CE: carboxylation efficiency; Γ*: carbon dioxide compensation point; Jmax: maximum electron transfer rate; Vcmax: maximum carboxylation efficiency; SLN: nitrogen content per unit leaf area
Fig. 3Effects of different nitrogen levels on nitrogen distribution (n = 7) and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (n = 7) in Panax notoginseng leaves. Nphoto: Photosynthetic apparatus; NC: Carboxylation system; NB: Bioenergetics; NL: Light harvesting system; PNUE: Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency. Data are mean with bars depicting standard deviation (± SD). Significant differences are indicated by letters (ANOVA; P values ≤0.05)
Fig. 4Responses of PSII maximum quantum efficiency (Fv`/Fm`, a), PSII photochemical quantum yield (ΦPSII, b), photochemical quenching (qP, c), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ, d) to photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in Panax notoginseng grown under different levels of nitrogen. Values for each point were means ± SD (n = 7). Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (ANOVA; P values ≤0.05)
Photosynthetic-related pigment in a shade-tolerant plant Panax notoginseng grown under different levels of nitrogen, means ± SD were given (n = 7)
| Variables | Nitrogen Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LN | MN | HN | |
| N (μg·cm−2) | 0.362 ± 0.129 c | 0.865 ± 0.265 b | 1.643 ± 0.332 a |
| V (μg·cm− 2) | 0.913 ± 0.124 a | 0.267 ± 0.195c | 0.493 ± 0.458b |
| A (μg·cm− 2) | 0.213 ± 0.019 a | 0.043 ± 0.072c | 0.153 ± 0.079b |
| L (μg·cm− 2) | 1.284 ± 0.352 c | 3.018 ± 0.970 b | 5.852 ± 0.926a |
| Z (μg·cm− 2) | 0.194 ± 0.023 a | 0.032 ± 0.048 c | 0.073 ± 0.201b |
| Chl(g·cm− 2) | 12.270 ± 1.783 c | 31.618 ± 2.356 b | 60.101 ± 2.455 a |
| β-Car(g·cm− 2) | 4.08 ± 2.14 a | 1.59 ± 0.69 c | 2.95 ± 0.69 b |
| V + A + Z (g·cm− 2) | 1.314 ± 0.023 a | 0.332 ± 0.035 c | 0.712 ± 0.043 b |
| (A + Z)/(V + A + Z) | 0.309 ± 0.015 ab | 0.226 ± 0.017 b | 0.317 ± 0.037 a |
| (V + A + Z)/Chl | 0.107 ± 0.018 a | 0.011 ± 0.027 b | 0.012 ± 0.028 b |
Different letter among nitrogen treatments represents a significant level (P ≤ 0.05). V violaxanthin; A antheraxanthin; Z Zeaxanthin; L Lutein; N Neoxanthin; β-Car: β-Carotene
Fig. 5Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to varied nitrogen level
Fig. 6Functional annotation and enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) responsive to low nitrogen and high nitrogen. a Gene annotation of DEGs. b KEGG enrichment analysis for DEGs
Fig. 7Functional annotation and enrichment analysis of common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between moderate- (MN) vs. low- (LN) nitrogen and high-nitrogen (HN) vs. LN comparisons. a Heat clustering of common DEGs based on the expression profiles. Blue indicates lower expression, and red indicates higher expression. b KEGG pathway analysis of up-regulated DEGs. (c) KEGG pathway analysis of down-regulated DEGs
Fig. 8Expression profiles of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that regulate photosynthesis and photoprotection under different nitrogen level