Literature DB >> 32592776

Highly accurate artificial intelligence systems to predict the invasion depth of gastric cancer: efficacy of conventional white-light imaging, nonmagnifying narrow-band imaging, and indigo-carmine dye contrast imaging.

Sayaka Nagao1, Yosuke Tsuji1, Yoshiki Sakaguchi1, Yu Takahashi1, Chihiro Minatsuki1, Keiko Niimi1, Hiroharu Yamashita2, Nobutake Yamamichi1, Yasuyuki Seto2, Tomohiro Tada3, Kazuhiko Koike1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diagnosing the invasion depth of gastric cancer (GC) is necessary to determine the optimal method of treatment. Although the efficacy of evaluating macroscopic features and EUS has been reported, there is a need for more accurate and objective methods. The primary aim of this study was to test the efficacy of novel artificial intelligence (AI) systems in predicting the invasion depth of GC.
METHODS: A total of 16,557 images from 1084 cases of GC for which endoscopic resection or surgery was performed between January 2013 and June 2019 were extracted. Cases were randomly assigned to training and test datasets at a ratio of 4:1. Through transfer learning leveraging a convolutional neural network architecture, ResNet50, 3 independent AI systems were developed. Each system was trained to predict the invasion depth of GC using conventional white-light imaging (WLI), nonmagnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI), and indigo-carmine dye contrast imaging (Indigo).
RESULTS: The area under the curve of the WLI AI system was .9590. The lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the WLI AI system were 84.4%, 99.4%, 94.5%, 98.5%, and 92.9%, respectively. The lesion-based accuracies of the WLI, NBI, and Indigo AI systems were 94.5%, 94.3%, and 95.5%, respectively, with no significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: These new AI systems trained with multiple images from different angles and distances could predict the invasion depth of GC with high accuracy. The lesion-based accuracy of the WLI, NBI, and Indigo AI systems was not significantly different.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32592776     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence: Emerging player in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disease.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Chen; Peng Ge; Jia-Yue Liu; Jia-Lin Qu; Fang Bao; Cai-Ming Xu; Hai-Long Chen; Dong Shang; Gui-Xin Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Roadmap from Technology Development to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Francesco Renna; Miguel Martins; Alexandre Neto; António Cunha; Diogo Libânio; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Miguel Coimbra
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: Status and challenges.

Authors:  Jia-Sheng Cao; Zi-Yi Lu; Ming-Yu Chen; Bin Zhang; Sarun Juengpanich; Jia-Hao Hu; Shi-Jie Li; Win Topatana; Xue-Yin Zhou; Xu Feng; Ji-Liang Shen; Yu Liu; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Novel Model Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Intramucosal Gastric Cancer (With Video).

Authors:  Dehua Tang; Jie Zhou; Lei Wang; Muhan Ni; Min Chen; Shahzeb Hassan; Renquan Luo; Xi Chen; Xinqi He; Lihui Zhang; Xiwei Ding; Honggang Yu; Guifang Xu; Xiaoping Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Identification of gastric cancer with convolutional neural networks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yuxue Zhao; Bo Hu; Ying Wang; Xiaomeng Yin; Yuanyuan Jiang; Xiuli Zhu
Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.577

Review 6.  Implementation of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Sayaka Nagao; Yasuhiro Tani; Junichi Shibata; Yosuke Tsuji; Tomohiro Tada; Ryu Ishihara; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Yancai Jiang; Boneng Mao; Xing Wang; Bo Lu; Ji Qian; Hutao Zhou; Tieliang Ma; Yefei Zhang; Sisi Li; Yun Shi; Zhendong Yao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Application of artificial intelligence-driven endoscopic screening and diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jer Hsiao; Yuan-Chih Wen; Wei-Yi Lai; Yi-Ying Lin; Yi-Ping Yang; Yueh Chien; Aliaksandr A Yarmishyn; De-Kuang Hwang; Tai-Chi Lin; Yun-Chia Chang; Ting-Yi Lin; Kao-Jung Chang; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Ying-Chun Jheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Usefulness of artificial intelligence in gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Kim; Seung-Joo Nam; Sung Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.