Nina Andersen-Ranberg1,2, Lone M Poulsen1,2, Anders Perner2,3, Jørn Wetterslev2,4, Ole Mathiesen1,2, Camilla B Mortensen1,2, Stine Estrup1,2, Bjørn H Ebdrup5,6, Johanna Hästbacka7, Giuseppe Citerio8, Jesus Caballero9, Matthew P G Morgan10, Marie Oxenbøll-Collet3, Sven-Olaf Weber11, Anne Sofie Andreasen12, Morten H Bestle6,13, Helle B S Pedersen14, Louise G Nielsen15, Bülent Uslu16, Troels B Jensen17, Carsten Thee18, Nilanjan Dey19, Theis Lange2,20. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark. 2. Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Copenhagen Trial Unit (CTU), Department 7812, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR) & Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark. 6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Anaesthesiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 8. Universitá Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy. 9. Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, IRBLLeida, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona-UAB, Barcelona, Spain. 10. Adult Critical Care, University of Wales, Cardiff, Wales. 11. General Intensive Care Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 12. Intensive Care Unit, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. 13. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark. 14. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing, Denmark. 15. Department of Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 16. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark. 17. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Unit West Jutland, Herning, Denmark. 18. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark. 19. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Unit West Jutland, Holstebro, Denmark. 20. Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The AID-ICU trial aims to assess the benefits and harms of haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in acutely admitted, adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This paper describes the detailed statistical analysis plan for the primary publication of results from the AID-ICU trial. METHODS: The AID-ICU trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group trial allocating 1000 adult ICU patients with manifest delirium 1:1 to haloperidol or placebo. The primary outcome measure is days alive and out of hospital within 90 days post-randomization. Secondary outcome measures are days alive without delirium or coma, serious adverse reactions (SARs) to haloperidol, use of escape medicine, days alive without mechanical ventilation, and mortality, health-related quality-of-life measures and cognitive function 1-year post-randomization. Statistical analysis will be conducted in accordance with the current pre-specified statistical analysis plan. One formal interim analysis will be performed. The primary outcome will be adjusted for stratification variables (site and delirium motor subtype) and compared between treatment groups using a likelihood ratio test described by Jensen et al A secondary analysis will be conducted with additional adjustment of the primary outcome for prognostic variables at baseline. The primary conclusion of the trial will be based on the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome adjusted for stratification variables. CONCLUSION: The AID-ICU trial will provide important, high-quality data on the benefits and harms of treatment with haloperidol in acutely admitted, adult patients with manifest delirium in the ICU.
BACKGROUND: The AID-ICU trial aims to assess the benefits and harms of haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in acutely admitted, adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This paper describes the detailed statistical analysis plan for the primary publication of results from the AID-ICU trial. METHODS: The AID-ICU trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group trial allocating 1000 adult ICU patients with manifest delirium 1:1 to haloperidol or placebo. The primary outcome measure is days alive and out of hospital within 90 days post-randomization. Secondary outcome measures are days alive without delirium or coma, serious adverse reactions (SARs) to haloperidol, use of escape medicine, days alive without mechanical ventilation, and mortality, health-related quality-of-life measures and cognitive function 1-year post-randomization. Statistical analysis will be conducted in accordance with the current pre-specified statistical analysis plan. One formal interim analysis will be performed. The primary outcome will be adjusted for stratification variables (site and delirium motor subtype) and compared between treatment groups using a likelihood ratio test described by Jensen et al A secondary analysis will be conducted with additional adjustment of the primary outcome for prognostic variables at baseline. The primary conclusion of the trial will be based on the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome adjusted for stratification variables. CONCLUSION: The AID-ICU trial will provide important, high-quality data on the benefits and harms of treatment with haloperidol in acutely admitted, adult patients with manifest delirium in the ICU.
Authors: Nina Andersen-Ranberg; Lone M Poulsen; Anders Perner; Johanna Hästbacka; Matthew P G Morgan; Giuseppe Citerio; Marie Oxenbøll-Collet; Sven-Olaf Weber; Anne Sofie Andreasen; Morten H Bestle; Bülent Uslu; Helle B S Pedersen; Louise G Nielsen; Kjeld Damgaard; Troels B Jensen; Trine Sommer; Nilanjan Dey; Ole Mathiesen; Anders Granholm Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 2.274