Bruno Kusznir Vitturi1, Alexandre In Han Kim2, Lucas Pari Mitre2, Ada Pellegrinelli2, Berenice Cataldo Oliveira Valerio2. 1. Department of Neurology, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Dr. Cesário Motta Júnior Street 112, São Paulo, 01221-020, Brazil. z_azul@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Neurology, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Dr. Cesário Motta Júnior Street 112, São Paulo, 01221-020, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent medical advances have enabled the control of neurological symptoms and increased survival of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). However, MG has many veiled consequences that may be underestimated by neurologists. Our aim was to clarify the social, professional, and neuropsychiatric issues of MG patients. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional cohort study with MG patients from a university-affiliated referral hospital. We registered clinical and sociodemographic data, and patients were classified according the MGFA classification. Clinical severity was assessed with Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) scale. Trained and blind investigators analyzed social and professional outcomes. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the social support with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). RESULTS: We enrolled 49 patients with MG. The mean age was 45.3 ± 18.1 years and 39 (79.6%) were women. There were 19 (38.8%) patients who become unemployed, 23 (46.9%) who had to retire prematurely, 31 (63.3%) that reported a significant reduction in work performance, and 23 (46.9%) who had a reduction in monthly income after the diagnosis of MG. Only 16 (32.6%) received any financial support and 24 (48.9%) patients had the perception of receiving a satisfactory social support. The practice of physical activity is a habit in only 10 patients (20.4%). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were present in 26 (53.1%) patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with MG are vulnerable to social, professional, and mental disadvantages. Therapeutic success in MG goes beyond symptom relief and inevitably depends on a personalized approach to the patient.
BACKGROUND: Recent medical advances have enabled the control of neurological symptoms and increased survival of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). However, MG has many veiled consequences that may be underestimated by neurologists. Our aim was to clarify the social, professional, and neuropsychiatric issues of MGpatients. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional cohort study with MGpatients from a university-affiliated referral hospital. We registered clinical and sociodemographic data, and patients were classified according the MGFA classification. Clinical severity was assessed with Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) scale. Trained and blind investigators analyzed social and professional outcomes. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the social support with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). RESULTS: We enrolled 49 patients with MG. The mean age was 45.3 ± 18.1 years and 39 (79.6%) were women. There were 19 (38.8%) patients who become unemployed, 23 (46.9%) who had to retire prematurely, 31 (63.3%) that reported a significant reduction in work performance, and 23 (46.9%) who had a reduction in monthly income after the diagnosis of MG. Only 16 (32.6%) received any financial support and 24 (48.9%) patients had the perception of receiving a satisfactory social support. The practice of physical activity is a habit in only 10 patients (20.4%). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were present in 26 (53.1%) patients. CONCLUSION:Patients with MG are vulnerable to social, professional, and mental disadvantages. Therapeutic success in MG goes beyond symptom relief and inevitably depends on a personalized approach to the patient.
Authors: A Jaretzki; R J Barohn; R M Ernstoff; H J Kaminski; J C Keesey; A S Penn; D B Sanders Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Donald B Sanders; Gil I Wolfe; Michael Benatar; Amelia Evoli; Nils E Gilhus; Isabel Illa; Nancy Kuntz; Janice M Massey; Arthur Melms; Hiroyuki Murai; Michael Nicolle; Jacqueline Palace; David P Richman; Jan Verschuuren; Pushpa Narayanaswami Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sophie Lehnerer; Jonas Jacobi; Ralph Schilling; Ulrike Grittner; Derin Marbin; Lea Gerischer; Frauke Stascheit; Maike Krause; Sarah Hoffmann; Andreas Meisel Journal: J Neurol Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 6.682