Parveen Kumar1, Ho-Cing Victor Yau2, Anand Trivedi3, David Yong4, Kamal Mahawar5. 1. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia. Kumar1511@yahoo.co.in. 2. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia. 3. Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia. 4. Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup, Western Australia. 5. Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is significant variation in practices concerning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) among bariatric surgeons, but there is currently a lack of robust data on the nature and extent of these variations. The purpose of this study was to understand global variations in practices concerning RYGB. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey® was created, and the link was shared freely on various social media platforms. The link was also distributed through a personnel email network of authors. RESULTS: A total of 657 surgeons from 65 countries completed the survey. Crohn's disease and liver cirrhosis were considered absolute contraindications for RYGB by 427 surgeons (64.98%) and 347 surgeons (53.30%), respectively. More than 68.5% of surgeons performed routine upper GI endoscopy while 64.17% performed routine ultrasound of abdomen preoperatively. The majority of surgeons (77.70%) used the perigastric technique for Gastric pouch creation. Approximately, 79.5% used orogastric bougie. More than 70% of the respondents did not use any staple line reinforcement routinely. Only 17.67% of surgeons measured the whole small bowel length, and the majority of surgeons (86.5%) used constant length of BP limb. Approximately, 89% used constant length of alimentary limb. Approximately, 95% of surgeons preferred antecolic bypass, and more than 86% routinely closed the Petersen defect. Marginal ulcer prophylaxis was used by the majority (91.17%). Almost 95% of surgeons recommended lifelong vitamin and mineral supplements. CONCLUSION: This survey identifies global variations in practices concerning RYGB. It identifies several areas for future research and consensus building.
INTRODUCTION: There is significant variation in practices concerning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) among bariatric surgeons, but there is currently a lack of robust data on the nature and extent of these variations. The purpose of this study was to understand global variations in practices concerning RYGB. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey® was created, and the link was shared freely on various social media platforms. The link was also distributed through a personnel email network of authors. RESULTS: A total of 657 surgeons from 65 countries completed the survey. Crohn's disease and liver cirrhosis were considered absolute contraindications for RYGB by 427 surgeons (64.98%) and 347 surgeons (53.30%), respectively. More than 68.5% of surgeons performed routine upper GI endoscopy while 64.17% performed routine ultrasound of abdomen preoperatively. The majority of surgeons (77.70%) used the perigastric technique for Gastric pouch creation. Approximately, 79.5% used orogastric bougie. More than 70% of the respondents did not use any staple line reinforcement routinely. Only 17.67% of surgeons measured the whole small bowel length, and the majority of surgeons (86.5%) used constant length of BP limb. Approximately, 89% used constant length of alimentary limb. Approximately, 95% of surgeons preferred antecolic bypass, and more than 86% routinely closed the Petersen defect. Marginal ulcer prophylaxis was used by the majority (91.17%). Almost 95% of surgeons recommended lifelong vitamin and mineral supplements. CONCLUSION: This survey identifies global variations in practices concerning RYGB. It identifies several areas for future research and consensus building.
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Kuldeepak Singh Kular; Chetan Parmar; Michael Van den Bossche; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Brijesh Madhok; Conor Magee; Sanjay Purkayastha; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Abdelrahman Nimeri; Marco Adamo; Cynthia-Michelle Borg; Rishi Singhal; Omar Khan; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Parveen Kumar; Chetan Parmar; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Norbert Schroeder; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kamal K Mahawar; Jacques Himpens; Scott A Shikora; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Mufazzal Lakdawala; Maurizio De Luca; Rudolf Weiner; Ali Khammas; Kuldeepak Singh Kular; Mario Musella; Gerhard Prager; Mohammad Khalid Mirza; Miguel Carbajo; Lilian Kow; Wei-Jei Lee; Peter K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Luigi Angrisani; A Santonicola; P Iovino; A Vitiello; K Higa; J Himpens; H Buchwald; N Scopinaro Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Marleen M Romeijn; Stijn van Hoef; Loes Janssen; Kelly G H van de Pas; François M H van Dielen; Arijan A P M Luijten; Kevin W A Göttgens; Jan Willem M Greve; Wouter K G Leclercq Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Daniel Moritz Felsenreich; Felix Benedikt Langer; Jakob Eichelter; Julia Jedamzik; Lisa Gensthaler; Larissa Nixdorf; Mahir Gachabayov; Aram Rojas; Natalie Vock; Marie Louise Zach; Gerhard Prager Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 4.241