Literature DB >> 32591889

Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.

Dominik Deniffel1,2, Nabila Abraham1, Khashayar Namdar1, Xin Dong1, Emmanuel Salinas1,2, Laurent Milot3, Farzad Khalvati1,2, Masoom A Haider4,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To benchmark the performance of a calibrated 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for risk assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using decision curve analysis (DCA).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 499 patients who had positive mpMRI (PI-RADSv2 ≥ 3) and MRI-targeted biopsy. The training cohort comprised 449 men, including a calibration set of 50 men. Biopsy decision strategies included using risk estimates from the CNN (original and calibrated), to perform biopsy in men with PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 only, or additionally in men with PI-RADSv2 3 and PSA density (PSAd) ≥ 0.15 ng/ml/ml. Discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness in the unseen test cohort (n = 50) were assessed using C-statistic, calibration plots and DCA, respectively.
RESULTS: The calibrated CNN achieved moderate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration test, p = 0.41) and good discrimination (C = 0.85). DCA revealed consistently higher net benefit and net reduction in biopsies for the calibrated CNN compared with the original CNN, PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 and the combined strategy of PI-RADSv2 and PSAd. Original CNN predictions were severely miscalibrated (p < 0.0001) resulting in net harm compared with a 'biopsy all' patients strategy. At-risk thresholds ≥ 10% using the calibrated CNN and the combined strategy reduced the number of biopsies by an estimated 201 and 55 men, respectively, per 1000 men at risk, without missing csPCa, while original CNN and PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 could not achieve a net reduction in biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: DCA revealed that our calibrated 3D-CNN resulted in fewer unnecessary biopsies compared with using PI-RADSv2 alone or in combination with PSAd. CNN calibration is important in achieving clinical utility. KEY POINTS: • A 3D deep learning model applied to multiparametric MRI may help to prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients eligible for MRI-targeted biopsy. • Owing to miscalibration, original risk estimates by the deep learning model require prior calibration to enable clinical utility. • Decision curve analysis confirmed a net benefit of using our calibrated deep learning model for biopsy decisions compared with alternative strategies, including PI-RADSv2 alone and in combination with prostate-specific antigen density.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Decision analysis; Deep Learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32591889     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07030-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of recurrence-free survival and adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on radiomics features.

Authors:  Fu-Hai Wang; Hua-Long Zheng; Jin-Tao Li; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Qi-Yue Chen; Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Elena Bertelli; Laura Mercatelli; Chiara Marzi; Eva Pachetti; Michela Baccini; Andrea Barucci; Sara Colantonio; Luca Gherardini; Lorenzo Lattavo; Maria Antonietta Pascali; Simone Agostini; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Comparative performance of fully-automated and semi-automated artificial intelligence methods for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Roberts; Leonardo Rundo; Nikita Sushentsev; Nadia Moreira Da Silva; Michael Yeung; Tristan Barrett; Evis Sala
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 4.  Augmenting prostate magnetic resonance imaging reporting to incorporate diagnostic recommendations based upon clinical risk calculators.

Authors:  Karisma Gupta; Jordan D Perchik; Andrew M Fang; Kristin K Porter; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-28

Review 5.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.