Literature DB >> 32591635

Detection of copy-number variations from NGS data using read depth information: a diagnostic performance evaluation.

Olivier Quenez1, Kevin Cassinari1, Sophie Coutant2, François Lecoquierre2, Kilan Le Guennec1, Stéphane Rousseau1, Anne-Claire Richard1, Stéphanie Vasseur2, Emilie Bouvignies2, Jacqueline Bou2, Gwendoline Lienard2, Sandrine Manase2, Steeve Fourneaux2, Nathalie Drouot2, Virginie Nguyen-Viet2, Myriam Vezain2, Pascal Chambon2, Géraldine Joly-Helas2, Nathalie Le Meur2, Mathieu Castelain2, Anne Boland3, Jean-François Deleuze3, Isabelle Tournier2, Françoise Charbonnier2, Edwige Kasper2, Gaëlle Bougeard2, Thierry Frebourg2, Pascale Saugier-Veber2, Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont2, Dominique Campion1,4, Anne Rovelet-Lecrux1, Gaël Nicolas5.   

Abstract

The detection of copy-number variations (CNVs) from NGS data is underexploited as chip-based or targeted techniques are still commonly used. We assessed the performances of a workflow centered on CANOES, a bioinformatics tool based on read depth information. We applied our workflow to gene panel (GP) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) data, and compared CNV calls to quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMSPF) or array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results. From GP data of 3776 samples, we reached an overall positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.8%. This dataset included a complete comprehensive QMPSF comparison of four genes (60 exons) on which we obtained 100% sensitivity and specificity. From WES data, we first compared 137 samples with aCGH and filtered comparable events (exonic CNVs encompassing enough aCGH probes) and obtained an 87.25% sensitivity. The overall PPV was 86.4% following the targeted confirmation of candidate CNVs from 1056 additional WES. In addition, our CANOES-centered workflow on WES data allowed the detection of CNVs with a resolution of single exons, allowing the detection of CNVs that were missed by aCGH. Overall, switching to an NGS-only approach should be cost-effective as it allows a reduction in overall costs together with likely stable diagnostic yields. Our bioinformatics pipeline is available at: https://gitlab.bioinfo-diag.fr/nc4gpm/canoes-centered-workflow .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32591635      PMCID: PMC7852510          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0672-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  39 in total

Review 1.  Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing for the detection of copy number variation.

Authors:  Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Rolph Pfundt; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 2.  Free-access copy-number variant detection tools for targeted next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Iria Roca; Lorena González-Castro; Helena Fernández; Mª Luz Couce; Ana Fernández-Marmiesse
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 5.657

3.  An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.

Authors:  Renjie Tan; Yadong Wang; Sarah E Kleinstein; Yongzhuang Liu; Xiaolin Zhu; Hongzhe Guo; Qinghua Jiang; Andrew S Allen; Mingfu Zhu
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Measuring and Estimating the Effect Sizes of Copy Number Variants on General Intelligence in Community-Based Samples.

Authors:  Guillaume Huguet; Catherine Schramm; Elise Douard; Lai Jiang; Aurélie Labbe; Frédérique Tihy; Géraldine Mathonnet; Sonia Nizard; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Alexandre Mathieu; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Eva Loth; Roberto Toro; Gunter Schumann; Patricia Conrod; Zdenka Pausova; Celia Greenwood; Tomas Paus; Thomas Bourgeron; Sébastien Jacquemont
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

5.  De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation.

Authors:  Andy Itsara; Hao Wu; Joshua D Smith; Deborah A Nickerson; Isabelle Romieu; Stephanie J London; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data.

Authors:  Niklas Krumm; Peter H Sudmant; Arthur Ko; Brian J O'Roak; Maika Malig; Bradley P Coe; Aaron R Quinlan; Deborah A Nickerson; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Accurate clinical detection of exon copy number variants in a targeted NGS panel using DECoN.

Authors:  Anna Fowler; Shazia Mahamdallie; Elise Ruark; Sheila Seal; Emma Ramsay; Matthew Clarke; Imran Uddin; Harriet Wylie; Ann Strydom; Gerton Lunter; Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2016-11-25

Review 8.  Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it.

Authors:  Medhat Mahmoud; Nastassia Gobet; Diana Ivette Cruz-Dávalos; Ninon Mounier; Christophe Dessimoz; Fritz J Sedlazeck
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Identification of copy number variants from exome sequence data.

Authors:  Pubudu Saneth Samarakoon; Hanne Sørmo Sorte; Bjørn Evert Kristiansen; Tove Skodje; Ying Sheng; Geir E Tjønnfjord; Barbro Stadheim; Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen; Olaug Kristin Rødningen; Robert Lyle
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.

Authors:  Fatima Zare; Michelle Dow; Nicholas Monteleone; Abdelrahman Hosny; Sheida Nabavi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic genetic testing for neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders: closing the gap between recommendation and clinical implementation.

Authors:  Brenda M Finucane; David H Ledbetter; Jacob As Vorstman
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  NGLY1 Deficiency: A Rare Newly Described Condition with a Typical Presentation.

Authors:  Ivana Dabaj; Bénédicte Sudrié-Arnaud; François Lecoquierre; Kimiyo Raymond; Franklin Ducatez; Anne-Marie Guerrot; Sarah Snanoudj; Sophie Coutant; Pascale Saugier-Veber; Stéphane Marret; Gaël Nicolas; Abdellah Tebani; Soumeya Bekri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27

3.  Genetic abnormalities in biopsy-proven, adult-onset hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy.

Authors:  Ludwig Haydock; Alexandre P Garneau; Laurence Tremblay; Hai-Yun Yen; Hanlin Gao; Raphaël Harrisson; Paul Isenring
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  ifCNV: A novel isolation-forest-based package to detect copy-number variations from various targeted NGS datasets.

Authors:  Simon Cabello-Aguilar; Julie A Vendrell; Charles Van Goethem; Mehdi Brousse; Catherine Gozé; Laurent Frantz; Jérôme Solassol
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 10.183

5.  Exome first approach to reduce diagnostic costs and time - retrospective analysis of 111 individuals with rare neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Skadi Beblo; Bernt Popp; Julia Klau; Rami Abou Jamra; Maximilian Radtke; Henry Oppermann; Johannes R Lemke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.351

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.