Martien H Humblet1, Yogen Singh2,3, Cecile Tissot4, Daniele De Luca5,6, Piet L Leroy1. 1. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 3. University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Clinique des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougeries, Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Division of Pediatrics, Transportation and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Center, South Paris University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France. 6. Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 1) To investigate the current practice in point-of-care ultrasound use in PICUs across Europe; 2) to understand the barriers for point-of-care ultrasound implementation in the clinical practice; 3) to identify existing point-of-care ultrasound training programs; and 4) to assess training needs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SUBJECTS: Medical directors of European PICUs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 42.3%; 142 of the 336 invited PICU medical directors from 26 European countries completed the survey. The clinicians in almost all the PICUs across Europe were reported to use point-of-care ultrasound in some form. A significant variation in the clinical practice according to the patient characteristics and presence of a fellowship training program was observed. PICUs with cardiosurgical patients reported using point-of-care ultrasound significantly more often than others. Ultrasound-guided vascular access was the most common point-of-care ultrasound indication, except in PICUs providing joint care for neonates and children. Units with a fellowship training program reported an increased use of point-of-care ultrasound for hemodynamic evaluation, during resuscitation and a positive impact on collaboration with imaging specialties. Although no barrier was deemed substantial to impede point-of-care ultrasound implementation, a number of potential hindrances to its implementation were reported-such as lack of formal training curriculum, collaborative learning opportunities, and quality assurance processes. Bedside informal teaching in point-of-care ultrasound was reported the most common method to acquire point-of-care ultrasound skills. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care ultrasound is being used extensively across heterogeneously organized PICU settings in Europe. However, there remains a significant variation in the clinical practice across the units. Clear needs for improved point-of-care ultrasound training programs and clinical governance structure were identified. Evidence-based point-of-care ultrasound guidelines, structured training programs dedicated to neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings, and educational research in point-of-care ultrasound use may help in strengthening clinical governance, making clinical practice uniform and enhancing quality assurance.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To investigate the current practice in point-of-care ultrasound use in PICUs across Europe; 2) to understand the barriers for point-of-care ultrasound implementation in the clinical practice; 3) to identify existing point-of-care ultrasound training programs; and 4) to assess training needs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SUBJECTS: Medical directors of European PICUs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 42.3%; 142 of the 336 invited PICU medical directors from 26 European countries completed the survey. The clinicians in almost all the PICUs across Europe were reported to use point-of-care ultrasound in some form. A significant variation in the clinical practice according to the patient characteristics and presence of a fellowship training program was observed. PICUs with cardiosurgical patients reported using point-of-care ultrasound significantly more often than others. Ultrasound-guided vascular access was the most common point-of-care ultrasound indication, except in PICUs providing joint care for neonates and children. Units with a fellowship training program reported an increased use of point-of-care ultrasound for hemodynamic evaluation, during resuscitation and a positive impact on collaboration with imaging specialties. Although no barrier was deemed substantial to impede point-of-care ultrasound implementation, a number of potential hindrances to its implementation were reported-such as lack of formal training curriculum, collaborative learning opportunities, and quality assurance processes. Bedside informal teaching in point-of-care ultrasound was reported the most common method to acquire point-of-care ultrasound skills. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care ultrasound is being used extensively across heterogeneously organized PICU settings in Europe. However, there remains a significant variation in the clinical practice across the units. Clear needs for improved point-of-care ultrasound training programs and clinical governance structure were identified. Evidence-based point-of-care ultrasound guidelines, structured training programs dedicated to neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings, and educational research in point-of-care ultrasound use may help in strengthening clinical governance, making clinical practice uniform and enhancing quality assurance.
Authors: Ignacio Oulego-Erroz; Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena; Victoria Aldecoa-Bilbao; María Del Carmen Bravo; Jon Montero-Gato; Rocío Mosqueda-Peña; Antonio Rodríguez Nuñez Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 3.183