Literature DB >> 32590377

Scalable surrogate deconvolution for identification of partially-observable systems and brain modeling.

Matthew F Singh1, Anxu Wang, Todd S Braver, ShiNung Ching.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For many biophysical systems, direct measurement of all state-variables, in - vivo is not feasible. Thus, a key challenge in biological modeling and signal processing is to reconstruct the activity and structure of interesting biological systems from indirect measurements. These measurements are often generated by approximately linear time-invariant dynamical interactions with the hidden system and may therefore be described as a convolution of hidden state-variables with an unknown kernel. APPROACH: In the current work, we present an approach termed surrogate deconvolution, to directly identify such coupled systems (i.e. parameterize models). Surrogate deconvolution reframes certain non linear partially-observable identification problems, which are common in neuroscience/biology, as analytical objectives that are compatible with almost any user-chosen optimization procedure. MAIN
RESULTS: We show that the proposed technique is highly scalable, low in computational complexity, and performs competitively with the current gold-standard in partially-observable system estimation: the joint Kalman Filters (Unscented and Extended). We show the benefits of surrogate deconvolution for model identification when applied to simulations of the Local Field Potential and blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. Lastly, we demonstrate the empirical stability of Hemodynamic Response Function (HRF) kernel estimates for Mesoscale Individualized NeuroDynamic (MINDy) models of individual human brains. The recovered HRF parameters demonstrate reliable individual variation as well as a stereotyped spatial distribution, on average. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate that surrogate deconvolution promises to enhance brain-modeling approaches by simultaneously and rapidly fitting large-scale models of brain networks and the physiological processes which generate neuroscientific measurements (e.g. hemodynamics for BOLD fMRI).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32590377      PMCID: PMC7946334          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aba07d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  21 in total

1.  An augmented Lagrangian approach to the constrained optimization formulation of imaging inverse problems.

Authors:  Manya V Afonso; José M Bioucas-Dias; Mário A T Figueiredo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks.

Authors:  K S Narendra; K Parthasarathy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits.

Authors:  Gaute T Einevoll; Christoph Kayser; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Spike inference from calcium imaging using sequential Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Joshua T Vogelstein; Brendon O Watson; Adam M Packer; Rafael Yuste; Bruno Jedynak; Liam Paninski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response.

Authors:  R L Buckner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Ekaterina I Lomakina; Lars Kasper; Zina M Manjaly; Alex Leff; Klaas P Pruessmann; Joachim M Buhmann; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input.

Authors:  W Rall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Estimation and validation of individualized dynamic brain models with resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Matthew F Singh; Todd S Braver; Michael W Cole; ShiNung Ching
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.