Literature DB >> 32589939

Combination of Rigid and Nonrigid Fixation Versus Nonrigid Fixation for Bilateral Mandibular Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vivesh Rughubar1, Yan Vares2, Priyadeshni Singh3, Anton Filipsky4, Adrian Creanga5, Syed Iqbal6, Moustafa Alkhalil7, Eeva Kormi8, Henning Hanken9, Alvaro Rivero Calle10, Wenko Smolka11, Michael Turner12, Gábor Csáki13, Gregorio Sánchez-Aniceto14, Daniel Pérez15, Carl-Peter Cornelius16, Belal Alani17, Daniel Vlad18, Risto Kontio19, Edward Ellis20.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare complication rates and functional outcomes in patients with bilateral mandibular fractures treated with different degrees of internal fixation rigidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter randomized controlled trial included adults with bilateral mandibular fractures located at either the angle and body, angle and symphysis, or body and symphysis. Patients were treated with either a combination of rigid fixation for the anterior fracture and nonrigid fixation for the posterior fracture (mixed fixation) or nonrigid fixation for both fractures. The primary outcome was complications within 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcomes were complications within 3 months, Helkimo dysfunction index, and mandibular mobility at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 315 patients enrolled, 158 were randomized to the mixed fixation group and 157 to the nonrigid fixation group. The overall complication rate at 6 weeks in the intention-to-treat population was 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3% to 15.6%) in the mixed fixation group and 7.8% (95% CI, 4.0% to 13.5%) in the nonrigid fixation group. With an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.51 to 3.17), there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups (P = .591). A multivariable model for complication risk at 6 weeks found no significant differences between treatment groups, but patients with moderate or severe displacement had a higher complication rate than those with no or minimal displacement (adjusted odds ratio, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.16 to 18.06; P = .030). There were no significant between-group differences in complication rates at 3 months. Moreover, no significant differences in Helkimo dysfunction index and mandibular mobility index at 6 weeks and 3 months were found between groups according to treatment allocated and treatment received.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of rigid and nonrigid fixation in patients with bilateral mandibular fracture has similar complication rates and functional outcomes to nonrigid fixation for both fractures.
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32589939     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  2 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial to compare functional, combined rigid and functional and rigid fixation in double mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Sandeep Pandey; Poonam Yadav; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Ongkila Bhutia; Devalina Goswami
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 2.  Mandibular Fractures: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Kanvar Panesar; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.195

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.