Literature DB >> 32588689

ETView VivaSight single lumen vs. conventional intubation in simulated studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seok Kyeong Oh1, Byung Gun Lim1, Young Sung Kim1, Jae Hak Lee1, Young Ju Won1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The ETView VivaSight single lumen airway tube (ETView) is a tracheal tube incorporating a video camera. We carried out a meta-analysis of previous simulation studies by inexperienced personnel to determine if the ETView could improve the success rate of first-attempt intubation.
METHODS: We collected data from randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the ETView VivaSight single lumen versus a conventional endotracheal tube in a simulated manikin or cadaver study.
RESULTS: Eleven studies (558 participants, 3,254 intubations, and 19 scenarios) were included. The ETView had a significantly higher success rate and shorter insertion time than conventional intubation in both normal airways (with or without chest compression) and in difficult airways. In addition, the ETView demonstrated better results in terms of a higher rate of Cormack-Lehane grade 1 and a lower incidence of dental trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: Inexperienced personnel can insert the ETView more rapidly and with a higher intubation success rate compared with a conventional tube.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway management; laryngoscope; manikin; meta-analysis; simulation; tracheal intubation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32588689      PMCID: PMC7436832          DOI: 10.1177/0300060520925653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  32 in total

Review 1.  Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Andrew H Travers; Thomas D Rea; Bentley J Bobrow; Dana P Edelson; Robert A Berg; Michael R Sayre; Marc D Berg; Leon Chameides; Robert E O'Connor; Robert A Swor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ETView® VivaSight SL as a novel method of endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Adrian Maciejewski; Michal Maciej Nowicki; Marek Dabrowski; Agata Dabrowska; Tomasz Klosiewicz
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.

Authors:  Diana R Elbourne; Douglas G Altman; Julian P T Higgins; Francois Curtin; Helen V Worthington; Andy Vail
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B M A Pieters; E H A Maas; J T A Knape; A A J van Zundert
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 5.  VivaSight: a new era in the evolution of tracheal tubes.

Authors:  Ayten Saracoglu; Kemal T Saracoglu
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sulagna Bhattacharjee; Souvik Maitra; Dalim K Baidya
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts.

Authors:  Thomas C Mort
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 8.  Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia Jiang; Danxu Ma; Bo Li; Yun Yue; Fushan Xue
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial.

Authors:  Zenon Truszewski; Paweł Krajewski; Marcin Fudalej; Jacek Smereka; Michael Frass; Oliver Robak; Bianka Nguyen; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Even four minutes of poor quality of CPR compromises outcome in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Heng Li; Lei Zhang; Zhengfei Yang; Zitong Huang; Bihua Chen; Yongqin Li; Tao Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Development of endotracheal intubation devices for patients with tumors.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yang Zhang; Bin Zhu; Wenyun Xu; Yi Yang; Zui Zou
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.