Literature DB >> 32588344

Pathologic response translates to improved patient survival after locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: the importance of minimally invasive microwave ablation.

Maria Baimas-George1, Michael Watson1, Jesse Sulzer1, Patrick Salibi1, Keith J Murphy1, David Levi1, John B Martinie1, Dionisios Vrochides1, Erin H Baker1, Lee Ocuin1, David A Iannitti2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy or transplantation can serve as curative treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, as progression remains a reality, locoregional therapies (LRT) for curative or bridging intent have become common. Efficacy on viability, outcomes, and accuracy of imaging should be defined to guide treatment.
METHODS: Patients with HCC who underwent minimally invasive (MIS) microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or both (MIS-MWA-TACE) prior to hepatectomy or transplantation were identified. Tumor response and preoperative computed tomography (CT) accuracy were assessed and compared to pathology. Clinical and oncologic outcomes were compared between MIS-MWA, TACE, and MIS-MWA-TACE.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients, with tumors from all stages of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, were identified who underwent LRT prior to resection or transplant. Fourteen patients underwent MIS-MWA, 46 underwent TACE, and 31 underwent both neoadjuvantly. TACE population was older; otherwise, there were no differences in demographics. Fifty-seven percent of MIS-MWA patients had no viable tumor on pathology whereas only 13% of TACE patients and 29% of MIS-MWA-TACE patients had complete destruction (p = 0.004). The amount of remaining viable tumor in the explant was also significantly different between groups (MIS-MWA: 17.2%, TACE: 48.7%, MIS-MWA-TACE: 18.6%; p ≤ 0.0001). Compared with TACE, the MIS-MWA and MIS-MWA-TACE groups had significantly improved overall survival (MIS-MWA: 99.94 months, TACE: 75.35 months, MIS-MWA-TACE: 140 months; p = 0.017). This survival remained significant with stratification by tumor size. CT accuracy was found to be 50% sensitive and 86% specific for MIS-MWA. For TACE, CT had an 82% sensitivity and 33% specificity and for MIS-MWA-TACE, there was a 42% sensitivity and 78% specificity.
CONCLUSION: The impact of locoregional treatments on tumor viability is distinct and superior with MIS-MWA alone and MIS-MWA-TACE offering significant advantage over TACE alone. The extent of this effect may be implicated in the improved overall survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bridging treatment; Hepatic resection; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Locoregional treatment; Microwave ablation; Minimally invasive; Transarterial chemoembolization; Transplant

Year:  2020        PMID: 32588344     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07747-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  42 in total

1.  Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with increased survival: Results from a large cohort in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Suzanne van Meer; Robert A de Man; Minneke J Coenraad; Dave Sprengers; Karin M J van Nieuwkerk; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Peter L M Jansen; Jan N M IJzermans; Martijn G H van Oijen; Peter D Siersema; Karel J van Erpecum
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: current update on treatment and allocation.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Dageforde; Kathryn J Fowler; William C Chapman
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Devan Kansagara; Joel Papak; Amirala S Pasha; Maya O'Neil; Michele Freeman; Rose Relevo; Ana Quiñones; Makalapua Motu'apuaka; Janice H Jou
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  The evolving epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global perspective.

Authors:  Michael C Wallace; David Preen; Gary P Jeffrey; Leon A Adams
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.869

5.  Hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living donor liver transplantation: The role of the Milan criteria.

Authors:  Sezgin Vatansever; Rasim Farajov; Hüseyin Cahit Yılmaz; Murat Zeytunlu; Zehra Betül Paköz; Murat Kılıç
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  The continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: an update.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Jessica A Davila; Nancy J Petersen; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo-Heng Zhang; Bing-Hui Yang; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Anjana Pillai; Jasmin Tiro
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Liver regeneration microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma for prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Hanmin Li; Lisheng Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation at 4 weeks versus cTACE alone: a propensity score.

Authors:  Zi-Yi Zhu; Mu Yuan; Pei-Pei Yang; Bo Xie; Jian-Zhu Wei; Zhong-Qiang Qin; Zhen Qian; Zhao-Ying Wang; Long-Fei Fan; Jing-Yu Qian; Yu-Lin Tan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.