| Literature DB >> 32587922 |
Ewa Kumiega1, Marcin Michałek1, Monika Kasztura2, Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although peripheral blood analysis has become increasingly automated, microscopy is the only available method for the diagnosis of anisocytosis and poikilocytosis. The aims of the study were to compare RBC volume data obtained with two different analysers and by manual assessment of smears and to compare this data between dogs in various stages of heart failure secondary to degenerative mitral valvular (DMV) disease. The impact of diuretic administration on RBC morphology was also assessed.Entities:
Keywords: anisocytosis; dog; haematology; mitral valve disease
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587922 PMCID: PMC7305654 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Results of semi-quantitative erythrocyte morphological analysis based on the number of abnormal cells in a single cell layer at 1,000 × magnification. Adapted from (24)
| 1+ | 2+ | 3+ | 4+ | |
| Anisocytosic cells | ||||
| Dog | 7–15 | 16–20 | 21–29 | > 30 |
| Polychromatic cells | ||||
| Dog | 2–7 | 8–14 | 15–29 | > 30 |
| Hypochromic cells | 1–10 | 11–50 | 51–200 | > 200 |
| Poikilocytosic cells | 3–10 | 11–50 | 51–200 | > 200 |
| Codocytes | 3–5 | 6–15 | 16–30 | > 30 |
| Spherocytes | 5–10 | 11–50 | 51–150 | > 150 |
| Echinocytes | 5–10 | 11–100 | 101–250 | > 250 |
| Other shapes* | 1–2 | 3–8 | 9–20 | > 20 |
*acanthocytes, schistocytes, keratocytes, ovalocytes, dacrocytes, drepanocytes, stomatocytes
Comparison of chosen haematological parameter results obtained using two different analysers Group
| Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyser | ||||||
| A | B1 | B2 | Cc | Dc | ||
| WBC (K/μL) | Laser Cyte | 7.40 ± 2.61 | 7.31 ± 2.63 | 8.94 ± 2.59 | 8.62 ± 2.74 | 10.22 ± 2.58 |
| Vet ABC | 7.68 ± 2.41 | 7.39 ± 2.23 | 8.76 ± 2.84 | 9.12 ± 2.90 | 10.32 ± 2.87 | |
| RBC (M/μL) | Laser Cyte | 6.86 ± 0.63 | 7.30 ± 0.89 | 7.10 ± 0.90 | 6.99 ± 0.69 | 6.95 ± 1.23 |
| Vet ABC | 6.98 ± 0.59 | 7.51 ± 0.91 | 7.05 ± 0.55 | 7.14 ± 0.68 | 7.14 ± 1.27 | |
| HCT (%) | Laser Cyte | 49.04 ± 5.65 | 51.33 ± 5.11 | 50.19 ± 0.10 | 48.56 ± 4.29 | 47.9 ± 7.42 |
| Vet ABC | 49.75 ± 4.59 | 52.5 ± 623 | 48.9 ± 4.00 | 49.1 ± 4.66 | 48.6 ± 7.76 | |
| HGB (mmol/L) | Laser Cyte | 10.13 ± 0.87 | 10.77 ± 1.08 | 10.34 ± 0.72 | 10.21 ± 0.92 | 10.05 ± 1.30 |
| VetABC | 10.01 ± 1.07 | 11.39 ± 2.58 | 9.94 ± 0.77 | 10.09 ± 1.31 | 11.35 ± 3.66 | |
| MCH (fmol) | Laser Cyte | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 1.47 ± 0.11 | 1.46 ± 0.12 | 1.46 ± 0.10 | 1.46 ± 0.11 |
| Vet ABC | 1.43 ± 0.07 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 1.38 ± 0.05 | |
| MCHC (mmol/L) | Laser Cyte | 20.73 ± 1.21 | 20.99 ± 1.48 | 20.71 ± 1.39 | 20.94 ± 1.20 | 21.23 ± 1.32 |
| Vet ABC | 19.91 ± 0.82 | 20.14 ± 0.32 | 20.19 ± 0.37 | 20.12 ± 0.41 | 20.17 ± 0.24 | |
| MCV (fL) | Laser Cyte | 71.36 ± 2.79 | 70.52 ± 3.72 | 70.74 ± 3.30 | 69.54 ± 4.82 | 68.62 ± 3.70 |
| Vet ABC | 71.4 ± 2.91 | 70 ± 2.62 | 69.8 ± 2.82 | 68.8 ± 2.35 | 68.2 ± 2.55 | |
| RDW (%) | Laser Cyte | 15.83 ± 0.93 | 15.59 ± 0.58 | 15.27 ± 0.29 | 15.59 ± 0.63 | 15.53 ± 0.41 |
| Vet ABC | 14.06 ± 0.72 | 13.75 ± 1.25 | 14.13 ± 0.49 | 14.54 ± 0.77 | 13.86 ± 1.20 | |
| PLT (K/μL) | Laser Cyte | 295.1 ± 73.96 | 326 ± 75.10 | 424.9 ± 95.08 | 420.64 ± 116.1 | 364.3 ± 142.24 |
| Vet ABC | 278.2 ± 68.82 | 289.7 ± 64.3 | 417.5 ± 150.2 | 387.96 ± 127.5 | 309.25 ± 86.30 | |
Presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD)
Semi-quantitative analysis of erythrocyte morphology in five groups of dogs: A, B1, B2, C, and D
| Study group | Intensification of changes | Anisocytosis | Macrocytosis | Echinocytes | Codocytes | Dacrocytes | Keratocytes | Schistocytes | Acanthocytes | Ovalocytes | Stomatocytes | Crystallised haemoglobin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/8*, ** | 2/8 | |||||||||||
| 1+ | (25%) | 2/8 | (25%) | |||||||||
| A | 2+ | (25%) | ||||||||||
| 1/8 | ||||||||||||
| n = 8 | 3+ | (12.5%) | ||||||||||
| 4+ | ||||||||||||
| 2/8 | 1/8 | 1/8 | 2/8 | |||||||||
| 1+ | (25%) | (12.5%) | (12.5%) | (25%) | ||||||||
| 2/8 | 1/8 | 1/8 | 1/8 | |||||||||
| B1 | 2+ | (25%) | (12.5%) | (12.5%) | (12.5%) | |||||||
| 1/8 | ||||||||||||
| n = 8 | 3+ | (12.5%) | ||||||||||
| 4+ | ||||||||||||
| 1+ | 3/10 | 1/10 | 1/10 | 3/10 | 1/10 | 2/10 | ||||||
| (30%) | (10%) | (10%) | (30%) | (10%) | (20%) | |||||||
| B2 | 2+ | 1(/10 10%) | ||||||||||
| n = 10 | 3+ | |||||||||||
| 4+ | ||||||||||||
| 1+ | 15/26 *, | 6/26 | 4/26 | 7/26 | 1/26 | 4/26 | 2/26 | 1/26 | 4/26 | 1/26 | 9/26 | |
| (57.7%) | (23%) | (15.4%) | (26.9%) | (3.8%) | (15.4%) | (7.7%) | (3.8%) | (15.4%) | (3.8%) | (34.6%) | ||
| 5/26 | 1/26 | 7/26 | 2/26 | 5/26 | ||||||||
| C | 2+ | (19.2%) | (3.8%) | (26.9%) | (7.7%) | (19.2%) | ||||||
| n = 26 | 3+ | 2/26 | 2/26 | |||||||||
| (7.7%) | (7.7%) | |||||||||||
| 4+ | ||||||||||||
| 3/8 **, | 1/8 | 2/8 | 1/8 | 2/8 | 2/8 | 1/8 | 2/8 | 2/8 | 3/8 | |||
| 1+ | (37.5%) | (12.5%) | (25%) | (12.5%) | (25%) | (25%) | (12.5%) | (25%) | (25%) | (37.5%) | ||
| 1/8 | 2/8 | |||||||||||
| D | 2+ | (12.5%) | (25%) | |||||||||
| n = 8 | 3+ | |||||||||||
| 4+ | ||||||||||||
Figs 1–6Sample blood smears representing: 1 – anisocytosis; 2 – echinocytes; 3 – codocytes; 4 – dacryocytes; 5 – stomatocytes; and 6 – crystallised haemoglobin