| Literature DB >> 32587921 |
Judita Zymantiene1, Vida Juozaitiene2, Rasa Zelvyte1, Vaidas Oberauskas1, Ugne Spancerniene1, Antanas Sederevicius1, Albina Aniuliene3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mobile phones (MP) and other electronic and communication devices that are used daily expose users to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and contribute to an increasing incidence of neurological disorders. Brain tissue is the closest organ to the MP as it operates, thus the influence of MP radiation on brain tissue is of particular concern, although research is still inconclusive. The present study investigated the possible effect of an EMF (1,350-1,375 megahertz (MHz)) from an MP on morphological and histopathological profiles in the mouse brain.Entities:
Keywords: brain; electromagnetic field; histopathology; mouse
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587921 PMCID: PMC7305646 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Morphometrical data of mouse brain
| Lobe | Control | EMF group I | EMF group II |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 10) | (n = 10) | (n = 10) | |
| M ± SD (mm) | M ± SD (mm) | M ± SD (mm) | |
| OB | 5.00 ± 0.13 | 5.04 ± 0.11 | 5.07 ± 0.08 |
| 95% CI | 4.91–5.09 | 4.96–5.12 | 5.01–5.13 |
| P | 0.0999973 | 0.0889386 | 0.0917641 |
| SC | 2.06 ± 0.11 | 2.08 ± 0.11 | 2.14 ± 0.11 |
| 95% CI | 1.98–2.14 | 2.00–2.16 | 2.06–2.22 |
| P | 0.0999993 | 0.0889386 | 0.0917651 |
| IC | 1.98 ± 0.04 | 1.98 ± 0.04 | 1.99 ± 0.03 |
| 95% CI | 1.95–2.01 | 1.95–2.01 | 1.97–2.01 |
| P | 0.0836604 | 0.081163 | 0.0800674 |
| C | 2.44 ± 0.16 | 2.50 ± 0.14 | 2.54 ± 0.08 |
| 95% CI | 2.33–2.55 | 2.40–2.60 | 2.48–2.60 |
| P | 0.1241794 | 0.1266725 | 0.1280379 |
| MO | 1.09 ± 0.10 | 1.11 ± 0.13 | 1.15 ± 0.14 |
| 95% CI | 1.02–1.16 | 1.02–1.20 | 1.05–1.25 |
| P | 0.0320313 | 0.0317181 | 0.0324736 |
| OBC | 16.43 ± 2.03 | 16.25 ± 2.12 | 16.63 ± 2.07 |
| 95% CI | 15.44–17.43 | 14.78–17.72 | 15.19–18.06 |
95% CI – confidence interval; P – value; OB – olfactory bulb; SC – superior colliculus in the septum; IC – interior colliculus in the septum; C – cerebellum; MO – medulla oblongata; OBC – olfactory bulb– cerebellum; EMF – electromagnetic field; M ± SD – mean and standard deviation of mean
Analysis of brain weight
| Group | N | Body weight, g | Brain weight, mg | RBW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | |||
| Control | n = 10 | 24.00 ± 0.00 | 193 ± 12.52 | 0.22 |
| 95%CI | 24.00–24.00 | 184.04–201.38 | ||
| EMF I | n = 10 | 21.77 ± 2.87 | 202 ± 15.63 | 0.23 |
| 95%CI | 19.99–23.57 | 189.02–211.38 | ||
| EMF II | n = 10 | 18.59 ± 3.35 | 207 ± 16.36 | 0.26 |
| 95%CI | 16.52–20.66 | 195.49–218.91 | ||
95% CI – confidence interval; N – number of animals; RBW – relative brain weight index; EMF – electromagnetic field; M ± SD – mean and standard deviation of mean
Fig. 1Comparison of mouse brain segmentation in groups (%)
Fig. 4Microscopic view of the vacuolated neurons and glial cells (EMF group II) and appearance of interstitial oedema (oedema in neuropil) (H&E, 400×)
Fig. 2Microscopic view of the great hemispheres of mice of EMF group I showing dystrophic changes (shrinkage) in some pyramidal neurons and some vacuolation of neurons and glial cells (H&E, 200×)