| Literature DB >> 32587884 |
Lars Nyberg1,2,3, Anders Lundquist3,4,5, Annelie Nordin Adolfsson6, Micael Andersson2,3, Henrik Zetterberg7,8,9,10, Kaj Blennow7,8, Rolf Adolfsson6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We investigated neurofilament light (NFL) accumulation in normal aging as well as in preclinical and clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and assessed individual differences in NFL load in relation to cognition and brain white-matter integrity.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; biomarker; brain white matter; cognition; early prediction; longitudinal; neurofilament light
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587884 PMCID: PMC7311800 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) ISSN: 2352-8729
FIGURE 1A, Study overview: Plasma biomarker collection in the context of the 30‐year longitudinal Betula design. The individuals were obtained from two samples of 1000 (S1) and 963 (S3) individuals included at Waves 1 (W1) and 2 (W2), respectively. The first collection of plasma samples at W3 forms the basis for comparing individuals with clinical (N = 37) and preclinical (N = 105) Alzheimer's disease (in figure: AD; Preclin‐AD) with matched controls (N = 126). W3 was also the first of three biomarker collections (secnd at W5; third at W6) for the longitudinal imaging sample. Cognitive testing was done at all waves; magnetic resonance imaging was done at W5–W7. * Clinical diagnoses were assessed repeatedly with start at baseline and thereafter every 5 years. # Preclinical AD is denoting individuals who subsequently developed AD 1–4, 5–10, and 11–15 years after W3 plasma NFL analysis. B, Flow chart: Illustration of the route and decision points from the parent cohort “The Betula Study” (N = 4425) to the two present subpopulations; the cross‐sectional case‐control sample (N = 142; N = 126) and the longitudinal imaging sample (N = 100). See “2.2 Participants” for complementary description. # = Among those who are not included in the present study due to the specified reasons, a number of individuals were deceased prior to W3 (N = 216)
FIGURE 2Longitudinal neurofilament light (NFL) changes. A, NFL levels increased exponentially in normal aging (thick line) with marked heterogeneity (thin lines). B, Individuals with high NFL levels (>Md at W6) had a stronger longitudinal NFL increase. C, The high NFL group had a stronger age‐related decline in white‐matter integrity in the splenium of corpus callosum. D, No NFL group difference was found for white‐matter hyperintensities. Shadowed areas represent ±1 standard error for each line
FIGURE 3Comparison of neurofilament light (NFL) levels in preclinical and diagnosed Alzheimer's disease versus matched controls. Case‐control differences were evaluated by paired t‐tests (one‐tailed). Missing control data were replaced by median imputation. * P = .040. Error bars are ±1 standard error (N/group, mean age in years)
FIGURE 4Cross‐sectional age differences in the case‐control sample. Individuals in each age were group median‐split into low and high neurofilament light (NFL) subgroups. A marked age‐related increase in NFL was observed, in particular in the high NFL subgroup. An exponential function was fitted to the means in each of the subgroups
FIGURE 5Neurofilament light (NFL) in relation to cognition. A significant NFL‐group difference in block‐design performance was observed for the longitudinal (A) but not for the cross‐sectional (B) sample. In (B), data from W3 are presented (ie, when the serum samples were taken), but similar non‐significant group effects were seen at all waves