| Literature DB >> 32587843 |
Natarajan Murugan1, Ramalingam Srinivasan1,2,3, Athiappan Murugan4, Myunghee Kim2, Devarajan Natarajan1.
Abstract
Several multidrug-resistant organisms have emerged, which increases the threat to public health around the world and a limited number of therapeutics were available to counteract these issues. Thus, researchers are trying to find out novel antimicrobials to overcome multidrug-resistant issues. The present study aimed to isolate antibacterial principles against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus from the ethyl acetate extract of Gycosmis pentaphylla. The isolation and structural characterization of bioactive compounds were carried out using various chromatographic techniques (TLC, column, HPLC, and LC-MS) and spectral studies such as FT-IR, CHNS analysis, 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR. The antimicrobial potential of isolated compounds was assessed according to the standard methods. The isolated compounds were identified as arborine and skimmianine, which exhibited a significant antibacterial effect with the lowest MIC and MBC values against MDR S. aureus and in vitro kinetic and protein leakage assays supported the antimicrobial activity. Significant morphological changes such as uneven cell surfaces and morphology, cell shrinkage, and cell membrane damages were observed in the MDR S. aureus upon the treatment of arborine and skimmianine. The present investigation concludes that the isolated arborine and skimmianine compounds from G. pentaphylla harbor a strong antibacterial activity against MDR S. aureus and may be used as alternative natural drugs in the treatment of MDR S. aureus.Entities:
Keywords: Gycosmis pentaphylla; MDR Staphylococcus aureus; antibacterial compounds; arborine; chromatography; skinmmianine; spectral study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587843 PMCID: PMC7297912 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1A close view of Glycosmis pentaphylla (Rutaceae).
FT-IR spectrum of arborine and skimmianine compounds.
| Arborine | 2,925 | Aromatic C–H Stretch |
| 2,855 | Aliphatic C–H Stretch | |
| 1,602 | C=O | |
| 1,264 | C–N Stretch | |
| 1,402 | Methyl bend | |
| 765 | Aromatic C–H bend out of the plane | |
| Skimmianine | 3,116 | Aromatic C–H Stretch |
| 2,937, 2,839 | Aliphatic C–H Stretch | |
| 1,616 | C=N Stretch | |
| 1,266, 1,056 | Phenyl ether C–O | |
| 1,390 | Methyl bend | |
| 1,056, 1,192 | Furan C–O | |
| 736 | C–H bend out of the plane |
Elemental analysis of arborine and skimmianine compounds.
| Arborine | Carbon | 76.78 | 76.22 |
| Hydrogen | 5.67 | 5.48 | |
| Nitrogen | 11.19 | 10.96 | |
| Oxygen | 6.39 | 6.23 | |
| Skimmianine | Carbon | 64.86 | 63.36 |
| Hydrogen | 5.05 | 4.98 | |
| Nitrogen | 5.40 | 5.02 | |
| Oxygen | 24.68 | 24.96 |
NMR (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) spectral data of arborine compound.
| 3.63 | 5 | Singlet | N-methyl proton |
| 4.29 | 6 | Singlet | Benzylic proton |
| 7.28–7.36 | 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | Multiplet | Aromatic (benzene ring) |
| 7.46 | 2, 3 | Triplet | Aromatic (quinazoline ring) |
| 7.71 | 1 | Doublet | Aromatic (quinazoline ring) |
| 8.37 | 4 | Doublet | Aromatic (quinazoline ring) |
| 34.8 | 7 | Singlet | N-methyl carbon |
| 43.4 | 10 | Singlet | Benzylic carbon |
| 114.4 | 1 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 120.0 | 8 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 125.9 | 3 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 127.3 | 14 | Singlet | Aromatic (Benzene ring) |
| 128.2 | 13, 15 | Singlet | Aromatic (Benzene ring) |
| 128.5 | 4 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 129.0 | 12, 16 | Singlet | Aromatic (Benzene ring) |
| 133.7 | 2 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 134.5 | 11 | Singlet | Aromatic (Benzene ring) |
| 141.4 | 9 | Singlet | Aromatic (Quinazoline ring) |
| 162.2 | 6 | Singlet | C=N (Quinazoline ring) |
| 169.0 | 5 | Singlet | Amide C=O |
NMR (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) spectral data of skimmianine compound.
| 4.03 | 3 | Singlet | Methoxy |
| 4.11 | 6 | Singlet | Methoxy |
| 4.41 | 7 | Singlet | Methoxy |
| 7.02 | 2 | Doublet | C–H (Furan ring) |
| 7.23 | 5 | Doublet | C–H (Aromatic ring) |
| 7.56 | 1 | Doublet | C–H (Furan ring) |
| 7.99 | 4 | Doublet | C–H (Aromatic ring) |
| 56.7 | 8 | Singlet | Methoxy carbon |
| 58.8 | 9 | Singlet | Methoxy carbon |
| 61.5 | 10 | Singlet | Methoxy carbon |
| 101.9 | 11 | Singlet | Aromatic-fused ring carbon |
| 104.4 | 2 | Singlet | Furan-fused ring carbon |
| 112.2 | 4 | Singlet | Aromatic ring carbon |
| 114.8 | 13 | Singlet | Aromatic-fused ring carbon |
| 117.9 | 5 | Singlet | Aromatic ring carbon |
| 141.4 | 14 | Singlet | Aromatic-fused ring carbon |
| 142.1 | 12 | Singlet | Furan-fused ring carbon |
| 142.8 | 1 | Singlet | Furan ring carbon |
| 152.0 | 6 | Singlet | Aromatic ring carbon |
| 157.0 | 7 | Singlet | Aromatic ring carbon |
| 164.2 | 3 | Singlet | Aromatic ring carbon |
Anti-bacterial activity of arborine and skimmianine compounds against MDR S. aureus.
| 1 | 28 ± 0.58 | 27 ± 0.24 | 23 ± 0.58 | 00 ± 0.00 | |
| 2 | 26 ± 0.00 | 25 ± 0.58 | 26 ± 0.58 | 00 ± 0.00 | |
| 3 | 27 ± 0.58 | 28 ± 0.08 | 29 ± 0.58 | 00 ± 0.00 | |
| 4 | 25 ± 0.15 | 26 ± 0.73 | 25 ± 0.58 | 00 ± 0.00 | |
| 5 | 28 ± 0.39 | 25 ± 0.08 | 27 ± 0.58 | 00 ± 0.00 |
MIC and MBC values of arborine and skimmianine compounds against MDR S. aureus.
| 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | >2 | >2 | |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | >2 | 2 | >2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | >2 | 1 | 1 | >2 | >2 | |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2 | >2 | 2 | >2 | |
Figure 2(A) Time-kill kinetic assay of arborine compound on different MDR Staphylococcus aureus strains. (B) Time-kill kinetic assay of skimmianine compound on different MDR Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Figure 3(A) Protein leakage assay of arborine compound on different MDR Staphylococcus aureus strains. (B) Protein leakage assay of skimmianine compound on different MDR Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Figure 4The effect of arborine and skimmianine on the morphology of different MDR Staphylococcus aureus strains observed under scanning electron microscopy. (A) Control (without any treatment), (B) arborine-treated, and (C) skimmianine-treated S. aureus cells (the numbers on the images represent the S. aureus strain numbers).